Department of Veterinary Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
J Vet Med Sci. 2022 Jun 17;84(6):831-840. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0086. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecular methods for E. canis detection. qPCR is quantitative but relies on standard curves of known samples. To overcome this difficulty, this study developed a new E. canis quantitative detection method, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ddPCR was evaluated against cPCR and blood smears. PCR amplicons and genomic DNA (gDNA) from 12 microscopic positive samples were used to identify the limits of detection (LODs) in ddPCR and cPCR. Our ddPCR was assessed in 92 field samples, it was compared with cPCR and blood smears. ddPCR showed LOD=1.6 copies/reaction, or 78 times more sensitive than cPCR (LOD=126 copies/reaction), using PCR amplicons as a template, whereas both ddPCR and cPCR had equal LODs at 0.02 ng gDNA/reaction. In addition, ddPCR had 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for E. canis detection compared to cPCR and no cross-reaction with other blood pathogens was observed. ddPCR identified more positive samples than cPCR and blood smear. ddPCR improved the overall performance of E. canis detection, with a better LOD and comparable sensitivity and specificity to cPCR. The technique might be helpful for diagnosis of E. canis in light infection, evaluating the number of E. canis and follow-up after treatment.
犬单核细胞埃立克体病由犬埃立克体感染引起,是一种危及生命的犬传染性疾病,在全球范围内发生。常规血涂片检查具有非常低的敏感性,不能准确提供定量结果。常规 PCR(cPCR)和实时 PCR(qPCR)是广泛用于检测犬埃立克体的分子方法。qPCR 是定量的,但依赖于已知样本的标准曲线。为了克服这一困难,本研究开发了一种新的犬埃立克体定量检测方法,使用液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)。ddPCR 与 cPCR 和血涂片进行了评估。使用 12 个显微镜阳性样本的 PCR 扩增子和基因组 DNA(gDNA)来确定 ddPCR 和 cPCR 的检测限(LOD)。我们的 ddPCR 在 92 个现场样本中进行了评估,与 cPCR 和血涂片进行了比较。ddPCR 显示 LOD=1.6 个拷贝/反应,使用 PCR 扩增子作为模板,比 cPCR(LOD=126 个拷贝/反应)灵敏 78 倍,而 ddPCR 和 cPCR 在 0.02 ng gDNA/反应时具有相同的 LOD。此外,与 cPCR 相比,ddPCR 对犬埃立克体的检测具有 100%的敏感性和 75%的特异性,且未观察到与其他血液病原体的交叉反应。ddPCR 比 cPCR 和血涂片检测到更多的阳性样本。ddPCR 提高了犬埃立克体检测的整体性能,具有更好的 LOD,与 cPCR 的敏感性和特异性相当。该技术可能有助于在轻度感染时诊断犬埃立克体,评估犬埃立克体的数量,并在治疗后进行随访。