Calchi Ana Cláudia, Mongruel Anna Claudia Baumel, Cavalcanti Fernanda Beatriz Pereira, Bartone Lilliane, Duarte José Maurício Barbanti, Medici Emília Patrícia, Kluyber Danilo, Caiaffa Mayara G, Alves Mario Henrique, Desbiez Arnaud Leonard Jean, Coelho Taciana Fernandes Souza Barbosa, Machado Rosangela Zacarias, Breitschwerdt Edward B, Maggi Ricardo G, André Marcos Rogério
Vector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, FCAV-UNESP, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Pathogens. 2025 Jun 6;14(6):567. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14060567.
Piroplasmids ( spp., spp., spp., spp.) are tick-borne apicomplexan protozoa that infect, depending on the species, erythrocytes and leucocytes in a wide variety of mammals and birds. The genera and include vector-borne bacteria that can infect and cause disease in both animals and humans. Detection of hemotropic bacteria and piroplasmids in wild animals is often challenging due to low bacteremia or parasitemia. Digital (d)PCR has proven to be an effective modality for the detection and quantification of DNA of hemotropic pathogens with low parasitemia. This study compared dPCR results from 366 biological samples from seven different Brazilian wild animal groups (5 Xenarthra species, 5 deer species, 3 felid species, 1 canid species, 3 rodent species, 1 bat species, 1 tapir species, and 12 bird species) to two other molecular diagnostic techniques: quantitative real-time (qPCR) and nested (nPCR). For this study, DNA extracted from wild animal blood and spleen samples were subjected to a multiplex dPCR assay for piroplasmids, spp., and spp. For comparison, the same primers and probes for each agent were used in qPCR assays. Additionally, an nPCR based on the 18S rRNA gene for piroplasmids was performed. The proportions of positive results obtained using dPCR were 85.5% for piroplasmids, 33.6% for spp., and 16.7% for spp. For all tested agents, dPCR proved to be the technique with the highest sensitivity, making it a useful tool for screening vector-borne agents in biological samples from wild animals with low parasitemia.
梨形虫(属、属、属、属)是蜱传播的顶复门原生动物,根据种类不同,可感染多种哺乳动物和鸟类的红细胞和白细胞。属和属包括可感染动物和人类并导致疾病的媒介传播细菌。由于菌血症或寄生虫血症水平较低,在野生动物中检测嗜血性细菌和梨形虫往往具有挑战性。数字(d)PCR已被证明是检测和定量低寄生虫血症的嗜血性病原体DNA的有效方法。本研究将来自巴西七个不同野生动物群体(5种贫齿目动物、5种鹿类、3种猫科动物、1种犬科动物、3种啮齿动物、1种蝙蝠、1种貘和12种鸟类)的366份生物样本的dPCR结果与另外两种分子诊断技术进行了比较:定量实时(qPCR)和巢式(nPCR)。在本研究中,从野生动物血液和脾脏样本中提取的DNA进行了针对梨形虫、属和属的多重dPCR检测。为了进行比较,在qPCR检测中使用了每种病原体相同的引物和探针。此外,还进行了基于梨形虫18S rRNA基因的巢式PCR。使用dPCR获得的阳性结果比例为:梨形虫85.5%,属33.6%,属16.7%。对于所有测试的病原体,dPCR被证明是灵敏度最高的技术,使其成为筛查低寄生虫血症野生动物生物样本中媒介传播病原体的有用工具。