• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别严重急性脑损伤患者家属的姑息治疗需求和心理健康结果。

Identification of Palliative Care Needs and Mental Health Outcomes Among Family Members of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e239949. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9949.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9949
PMID:37097633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10130947/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Family members of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) are at risk for poor psychological outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the utility of the early use of a palliative care needs checklist in identifying care needs of patients with SABI and family members who are at risk of poor psychological outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study included patients with SABI in an intensive care unit (ICU) for 2 days or more and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or lower and their family members. This single-center study was conducted at an academic hospital in Seattle, Washington, from January 2018 to June 2021. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to July 2022.

EXPOSURE

At enrollment, a 4-item palliative care needs checklist was completed separately by clinicians and family members.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A single family member for each enrolled patient completed questionnaires assessing symptoms of depression and anxiety, perception of goal-concordant care, and satisfaction in the ICU. Six months later, family members assessed their psychological symptoms, decisional regret, patient functional outcome, and patient quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

A total of 209 patient-family member pairs (family member mean [SD] age, 51 [16] years; 133 women [64%]; 18 Asian [9%], 21 Black [10%], 20 [10%] Hispanic, and 153 White [73%] participants) were included. Patients had experienced stroke (126 [60%]), traumatic brain injury (62 [30%]), and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (21 [10%]). At least 1 need was identified for 185 patients or their families (88%) by family members and 110 (53%) by clinicians (κ = -0.007; 52% agreement). Symptoms of at least moderate anxiety or depression were present in 50% of family members at enrollment (87 with anxiety and 94 with depression) and 20% at follow-up (33 with anxiety and 29 with depression). After adjustment for patient age, diagnosis, and disease severity and family race and ethnicity, clinician identification of any need was associated with greater goal discordance (203 participants; relative risk = 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.5]) and family decisional regret (144 participants; difference in means, 17 [95% CI, 5 to 29] points). Family member identification of any need was associated with greater symptoms of depression at follow-up (150 participants; difference in means of Patient Health Questionnaire-2, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3] points) and worse perceived patient QOL (78 participants; difference in means, -17.1 [95% CI, -33.6 to -0.5] points).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this prospective cohort study of patients with SABI and their families, palliative care needs were common, although agreement on needs was poor between clinicians and family members. A palliative care needs checklist completed by clinicians and family members may improve communication and promote timely, targeted management of needs.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/10130947/cd2db3b2c8a4/jamanetwopen-e239949-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/10130947/cd2db3b2c8a4/jamanetwopen-e239949-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73ec/10130947/cd2db3b2c8a4/jamanetwopen-e239949-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

严重急性脑损伤(SABI)患者的家属存在心理结局不良的风险。

目的

探讨早期使用姑息治疗需求清单来识别 SABI 患者及其有心理结局不良风险的家属的护理需求的作用。

设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了在重症监护病房(ICU)中至少住院 2 天且格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分 12 分或更低的 SABI 患者及其家属。这项单中心研究于 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月在华盛顿州西雅图的一家学术医院进行。数据于 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 7 月进行分析。

暴露因素

在入组时,临床医生和家属分别完成了一份 4 项姑息治疗需求清单。

主要结果和测量指标

每位入组患者的一名家属完成了评估抑郁和焦虑症状、感知目标一致的护理、以及 ICU 满意度的问卷。6 个月后,家属评估了他们的心理症状、决策后悔、患者的功能结局和患者的生活质量(QOL)。

结果

共纳入了 209 对患者-家属(家属平均[SD]年龄为 51[16]岁;133 名女性[64%];18 名亚洲人[9%],21 名黑人[10%],20 名[10%]西班牙裔和 153 名白人[73%]参与者)。患者经历过中风(126[60%])、创伤性脑损伤(62[30%])和缺氧缺血性脑病(21[10%])。至少有 1 种需求是由家属(185 名患者或其家属中的 88%)和 110 名(53%)临床医生识别出的(κ= -0.007;52%的一致性)。在入组时,50%的家属有至少中度的焦虑或抑郁症状(87 名有焦虑,94 名有抑郁),20%在随访时(33 名有焦虑,29 名有抑郁)。在调整了患者年龄、诊断、疾病严重程度以及家庭种族和民族因素后,临床医生识别出的任何需求都与更大的目标不一致(203 名参与者;相对风险=1.7[95%CI,1.2 至 2.5])和家庭决策后悔(144 名参与者;平均差异,17[95%CI,5 至 29]分)相关。家属识别出任何需求都与随访时更大的抑郁症状相关(150 名参与者;患者健康问卷-2 的平均差异,0.8[95%CI,0.2 至 1.3]分)和更差的感知患者 QOL(78 名参与者;平均差异,-17.1[95%CI,-33.6 至 -0.5]分)相关。

结论和相关性

在这项对 SABI 患者及其家属的前瞻性队列研究中,姑息治疗需求很常见,尽管临床医生和家属对需求的共识很差。由临床医生和家属完成的姑息治疗需求清单可能会改善沟通,并促进及时、有针对性地管理需求。

相似文献

1
Identification of Palliative Care Needs and Mental Health Outcomes Among Family Members of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury.识别严重急性脑损伤患者家属的姑息治疗需求和心理健康结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e239949. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9949.
2
Mobile Application-Based Communication Facilitation Platform for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于移动应用的危重症患者家属沟通促进平台:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2349666. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49666.
3
Palliative Care Planner: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Acceptability and Usability of an Electronic Health Records System-integrated, Needs-targeted App Platform.姑息治疗计划者:一项评估电子病历系统集成、需求导向的应用平台可接受性和可用性的试点研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):59-68. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-500OC.
4
Assessment of Discordance Between Physicians and Family Members Regarding Prognosis in Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury.评估严重急性脑损伤患者的医生和家属之间在预后方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128991. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28991.
5
Is There Hope? Is She There? How Families and Clinicians Experience Severe Acute Brain Injury.还有希望吗?她还在吗?家庭与临床医生如何面对严重急性脑损伤
J Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;20(2):170-176. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0286. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
6
Improving racial disparities in unmet palliative care needs among intensive care unit family members with a needs-targeted app intervention: The ICUconnect randomized clinical trial.通过以需求为导向的应用程序干预改善重症监护病房家庭成员未满足的姑息治疗需求方面的种族差异:ICUconnect随机临床试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106319. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106319. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
7
Prognosis Predictions by Families, Physicians, and Nurses of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: Agreement and Accuracy.严重急性脑损伤患者的家属、医生和护士的预后预测:一致性和准确性。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01501-7. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Longitudinal Recovery Following Repetitive Traumatic Brain Injury.重复性创伤性脑损伤后的纵向恢复。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335804. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35804.
9
Assessment of Clinical Palliative Care Trigger Status vs Actual Needs Among Critically Ill Patients and Their Family Members.评估危重症患者及其家属的临床姑息治疗触发状态与实际需求。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144093. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44093.
10
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes After Severe Acute Brain Injury Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: Recovery Trajectories Among Patients and Mental Health Symptoms of Their Surrogate Decision Makers.需要机械通气的严重急性脑损伤后的长期预后:患者的康复轨迹及其替代决策者的心理健康症状
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Nov 19. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02164-2.
2
Integration of Palliative Care in Neurosurgical Critical Care : Insights from a Single-Center Perspective.神经外科重症监护中姑息治疗的整合:单中心视角的见解
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2025 Mar;68(2):213-222. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2024.0065. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty.

本文引用的文献

1
Surrogates of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury Experience Persistent Anxiety and Depression Over the 6 Months After ICU Admission.严重急性脑损伤患者的替代者在 ICU 入院后 6 个月内持续经历焦虑和抑郁。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):e633-e639. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.336.
2
Integrating palliative care into the ICU: a lasting and developing legacy.将姑息治疗融入重症监护病房:一份持久且不断发展的遗产。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jul;48(7):939-942. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06729-7. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
Assessment of Clinical Palliative Care Trigger Status vs Actual Needs Among Critically Ill Patients and Their Family Members.
神经重症监护中的姑息治疗最新进展:面对预后不确定性时提供目标一致的护理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2023 Dec;25(12):517-529. doi: 10.1007/s11940-023-00778-z. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
4
Mobile Application-Based Communication Facilitation Platform for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于移动应用的危重症患者家属沟通促进平台:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2349666. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49666.
评估危重症患者及其家属的临床姑息治疗触发状态与实际需求。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144093. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44093.
4
Goal-Concordant Care After Severe Acute Brain Injury.重度急性脑损伤后的目标一致照护
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 17;12:710783. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.710783. eCollection 2021.
5
The Pitfalls of Utilizing "Goals of Care" as a Clinical Buzz Phrase: A Case Study and Proposed Solution.将“照护目标”用作临床流行语的陷阱:一个案例研究及建议的解决方案
Palliat Med Rep. 2020 Oct 6;1(1):216-220. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0063. eCollection 2020.
6
Deriving Place of Residence, Modified Rankin Scale, and EuroQol-5D Scores from the Medical Record for Stroke Survivors.从脑卒中幸存者的病历中推导居住地点、改良 Rankin 量表和 EuroQol-5D 评分。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;50(5):567-573. doi: 10.1159/000516571. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
7
Stress, anxiety, depression and basic hope in family members of patients hospitalised in intensive care units - preliminary report.重症监护病房患者家属的压力、焦虑、抑郁和基本希望——初步报告。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(2):134-140. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.105728.
8
Post-intensive care syndrome: its pathophysiology, prevention, and future directions.重症监护后综合征:其病理生理学、预防及未来方向。
Acute Med Surg. 2019 Apr 25;6(3):233-246. doi: 10.1002/ams2.415. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
Psychological Sequelae in Family Caregivers of Critically III Intensive Care Unit Patients. A Systematic Review.危重症患者 ICU 家属的心理后遗症。系统评价。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jul;16(7):894-909. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201808-540SR.
10
Palliative care in intensive care units: why, where, what, who, when, how.重症监护病房中的姑息治疗:为何、何处、何事、何人、何时、如何。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0574-9.