Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BJU Int. 2022 Nov;130(5):611-618. doi: 10.1111/bju.15759. Epub 2022 May 13.
To evaluate: (i) safety, (ii) feasibility, and medium-term (iii) oncological and (iv) functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) for recurrent localised prostate cancer (PCa) following initial focal therapy using irreversible electroporation (IRE).
An international, multicentre and retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent sRP for recurrent localised PCa after initial primary IRE treatment. Data were reported on (i) surgical complications, (ii) feasibility of sRP reported by surgeons, (iii) time interval between IRE and sRP and pathology results, and (iv) urinary continence, erectile function, and quality of life.
In four participating centres, a total of 39 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 64 (60-67) years were identified. No serious adverse events occurred during or following sRP and surgery was deemed feasible without difficulties. The median (IQR) time to recurrence following IRE was 14.3 (9.1-38.8) months. Pathology results showed localised disease in 21 patients (53.8%) and locally-advanced disease in 18 (46.2%). Positive surgical margins (PSMs) were observed in 10 patients (25.6%), of which six (15.4%) had significant PSMs. A persistent detectable prostate-specific antigen level was found in one case after sRP, caused by metastatic disease. One patient had a biochemical recurrence 6 months after sRP. These two cases, together with a PSM case, required additional therapy after sRP. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 17.7 (11.8-26.4) months, urinary continence and erectile function were preserved in 34 (94.4%) and 18 patients (52.9%), respectively, while quality of life remained stable.
Salvage RP is safe and feasible for patients with recurrent localised PCa following initial IRE treatment. The medium-term oncological and functional outcomes are similar to primary RP. Strict patient selection for focal therapy and standardised follow-up is needed as some patients developed high-grade disease.
评估初始局灶性治疗采用不可逆电穿孔(IRE)后复发局限性前列腺癌(PCa)行挽救性根治性前列腺切除术(sRP)的安全性、可行性、中期(iii)肿瘤学和(iv)功能结局。
对接受初始原发性 IRE 治疗后复发局限性 PCa 行 sRP 的患者前瞻性收集数据进行国际、多中心、回顾性分析。报告数据包括(i)手术并发症、(ii)外科医生报告的 sRP 可行性、(iii)IRE 与 sRP 之间的时间间隔和病理结果以及(iv)尿控、勃起功能和生活质量。
在 4 个参与中心,共确定了 39 名中位(四分位距 [IQR])年龄 64(60-67)岁的患者。sRP 期间或之后无严重不良事件发生,手术被认为可行,无困难。IRE 后复发的中位(IQR)时间为 14.3(9.1-38.8)个月。病理结果显示 21 名患者(53.8%)存在局限性疾病,18 名患者(46.2%)存在局部进展性疾病。10 名患者(25.6%)存在阳性切缘(PSMs),其中 6 名(15.4%)存在显著 PSMs。sRP 后 1 例患者出现持续可检测前列腺特异性抗原水平,原因是转移性疾病。1 例患者在 sRP 后 6 个月发生生化复发。这两例病例以及一例 PSM 病例在 sRP 后需要额外治疗。中位(IQR)随访 17.7(11.8-26.4)个月后,34 名(94.4%)和 18 名(52.9%)患者分别保留了尿控和勃起功能,生活质量保持稳定。
对于初始 IRE 治疗后复发局限性 PCa 患者,挽救性 RP 是安全可行的。中期肿瘤学和功能结局与原发性 RP 相似。需要对局灶性治疗进行严格的患者选择和标准化随访,因为有些患者发生了高级别疾病。