• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳青霉烯类药物与新型抗生素治疗成年复杂性尿路感染患者的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and Safety of Carbapenems vs New Antibiotics for Treatment of Adult Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ezure Yukiko, Rico Veronica, Paterson David L, Hall Lisa, Harris Patrick N A, Soriano Alex, Roberts Jason A, Bassetti Matteo, Roberts Matthew J, Righi Elda, Wright Hugh

机构信息

The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 10;9(5):ofaa480. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa480. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaa480
PMID:35474756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9031024/
Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of carbapenems for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), with the comparators being new antibiotics evaluated for this indication. We searched 13 electronic databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and completed and/or ongoing trials. The search terms were developed using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study framework. Pooled efficacy estimates of composite cure (clinical success and microbiological eradication) favored the new antibiotic groups, although this was not statistically significant (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.04). A pooled estimate examining clinical response alone showed no difference between treatment arms (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05), however, new antibiotic treatments were superior to carbapenems for microbiological response (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91). New antibiotic treatments demonstrated a superior microbiological response compared with carbapenems in clinical trials of cUTI, despite an absence of carbapenem resistance. However, it is noteworthy that the clinical response and safety profile of new antibiotics were not different from those of carbapenems.

摘要

本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了碳青霉烯类药物治疗复杂性尿路感染(cUTIs)的临床疗效和安全性,对照药物为针对该适应症评估的新型抗生素。我们检索了13个电子数据库,查找已发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)以及已完成和/或正在进行的试验。检索词是根据人群、干预措施、对照、结局和研究框架制定的。综合治愈(临床成功和微生物清除)的合并疗效估计有利于新型抗生素组,尽管这在统计学上无显著意义(风险比[RR],0.91;95%CI,0.79 - 1.04)。单独检查临床反应的合并估计显示各治疗组之间无差异(RR,1.00;95%CI,0.96 - 1.05),然而,新型抗生素治疗在微生物学反应方面优于碳青霉烯类药物(RR,0.85;95%CI,0.79 - 0.91)。在cUTI的临床试验中,尽管不存在碳青霉烯类耐药,但新型抗生素治疗在微生物学反应方面表现优于碳青霉烯类药物。然而,值得注意的是,新型抗生素的临床反应和安全性概况与碳青霉烯类药物并无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/a41814ad1ef9/ofaa480f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/e8ccea12c798/ofaa480f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/350a50336609/ofaa480f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/3526bdca172e/ofaa480f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/aba3db2d2827/ofaa480f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/a41814ad1ef9/ofaa480f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/e8ccea12c798/ofaa480f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/350a50336609/ofaa480f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/3526bdca172e/ofaa480f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/aba3db2d2827/ofaa480f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/9031024/a41814ad1ef9/ofaa480f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Carbapenems vs New Antibiotics for Treatment of Adult Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.碳青霉烯类药物与新型抗生素治疗成年复杂性尿路感染患者的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 10;9(5):ofaa480. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa480. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.碳青霉烯类药物与其他抗生素治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18769. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018769.
3
Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.碳青霉烯类药物与其他抗菌药物治疗抗微生物药物耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的复杂性尿路感染的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):e069166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069166.
4
Clinical efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics for complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新型抗生素治疗复杂性尿路感染的临床疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Jul;62(1):106830. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106830. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
Non-carbapenem β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors versus carbapenems for urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review.非碳青霉烯类β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂与碳青霉烯类药物治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌引起的尿路感染的系统评价
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Oct;58(4):106410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106410. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
The use of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and complicated urinary tract infections-A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.头孢他啶-他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染和复杂性尿路感染的应用-一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Feb;55(2):105858. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
7
Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase inhibitor combinations vs alternative antibiotics in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合用药与其他抗生素治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e19960. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019960.
8
The Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.依拉环素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 17;8(6):866. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060866.
9
Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与多利培南治疗复杂性尿路感染(包括急性肾盂肾炎):RECAPTURE,一项3期随机试验项目。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 15;63(6):754-762. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw378. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections-A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.多利培南治疗急性细菌感染的疗效与安全性——随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 2;8(7):958. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070958.

引用本文的文献

1
activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators against isolates collected in Brazilian hospitals according to results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, 2020-2021.根据2020 - 2021年抗菌药物耐药性趋势监测研究结果,亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦及对照药物对巴西医院分离菌株的活性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0254324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02543-24. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Efficacy of treatment options for complicated urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.包括急性肾盂肾炎在内的复杂性尿路感染治疗方案的疗效:一项系统文献综述和网状荟萃分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Mar;14(3):e240214. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0214. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Genomics of Antibiotic-Resistant Uropathogens Implicates Three Routes for Recurrence of Urinary Tract Infections.抗生素耐药尿路病原体的比较基因组学提示尿路感染复发的三种途径。
mBio. 2019 Aug 27;10(4):e01977-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01977-19.
2
Epidemiology and Mechanisms of Resistance of Extensively Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.广泛耐药革兰阴性菌的流行病学及耐药机制
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Apr 6;8(2):37. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8020037.
3
Once-Daily Plazomicin for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.每日 1 次普拉唑米星治疗复杂性尿路感染。
Novel β-lactam antibiotics versus other antibiotics for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
新型β-内酰胺类抗生素与其他抗生素治疗复杂性尿路感染的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 10;15:1420170. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1420170. eCollection 2024.
4
Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant in Sewage in Kuwait: Their Implications.科威特污水中的多重耐药和广泛耐药:其影响
Microorganisms. 2023 Oct 23;11(10):2610. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102610.
5
Impact of antibiotic pharmacokinetics in urine on recurrent bacteriuria following treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.抗生素尿药动力学对治疗复杂性尿路感染后复发性菌尿的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Oct 18;67(10):e0053523. doi: 10.1128/aac.00535-23. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing .哌拉西林他唑巴坦与美罗培南治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌所致复杂性尿路感染(包括急性肾盂肾炎)的疗效和安全性比较
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 May 3;13:1093842. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1093842. eCollection 2023.
7
Efficacy of carbapenems versus alternative antimicrobials for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.碳青霉烯类药物与其他抗菌药物治疗抗微生物药物耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的复杂性尿路感染的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):e069166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069166.
8
Evaluation of the efficacy of the antimicrobial peptide HJH-3 in chickens infected with Pullorum.抗菌肽HJH-3对感染鸡白痢的鸡的疗效评估。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 24;14:1102789. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1102789. eCollection 2023.
9
Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Multidrug Resistant Urosepsis: A Review.多重耐药性泌尿道感染的当前及新出现的治疗选择:综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;11(12):1821. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121821.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):729-740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801467.
4
Random-Effects Meta-analysis: Summarizing Evidence With Caveats.随机效应荟萃分析:带有注意事项的证据总结
JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):301-302. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19684.
5
Cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative uropathogens: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.头孢地尔优于亚胺培南西司他丁钠治疗革兰氏阴性尿路病原体引起的复杂性尿路感染:一项 2 期、随机、双盲、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;18(12):1319-1328. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30554-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Attributable clinical and economic burden of carbapenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative infections in patients hospitalized with complicated urinary tract infections.耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌感染的住院复杂性尿路感染患者的临床及经济负担归因分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 May;102(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.11.018. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与美罗培南对产 ESBLs 的大肠埃希菌或肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染且对头孢曲松耐药患者 30 天死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):984-994. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163.
8
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Oct;52(4):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Critical knowledge gaps and research needs related to the environmental dimensions of antibiotic resistance.与抗生素耐药性的环境层面相关的关键知识空白和研究需求。
Environ Int. 2018 Aug;117:132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.041. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Aug 1;73(8):2021-2029. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky124.