• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Medicine D, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Aug 1;73(8):2021-2029. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky124.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dky124
PMID:29659836
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime/avibactam is approved for complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections (UTIs) based on results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data regarding its effectiveness in treating hospital-acquired infections or resistant pathogens have not been systematically compiled.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis including RCTs evaluating ceftazidime/avibactam versus comparator for the treatment of any infection. Primary outcome was 30 day all-cause mortality. Subgroups of hospital-acquired infections and specific resistance phenotypes were planned.

RESULTS

Seven publications (eight trials, 4093 patients) were included, reporting a baseline ∼25% of ESBL-carrying Enterobacteriaceae. No significant difference between ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator (mostly carbapenem) was demonstrated for 30 day all-cause mortality, late follow-up mortality and clinical response [relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.70-1.72, P = 0.69; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.76, P = 0.25; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, P = 0.21, respectively, without significant heterogeneity]. Higher microbiological response rate was demonstrated with ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with UTI (RR 1.14, 1.0-1.29, P = 0.05, I2 = 51%). No significant difference in clinical response was demonstrated for patients with ceftazidime-resistant pathogens (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.10, P = 0.66, I2 = 0%). Results for other subgroups of resistant pathogens or hospital-acquired infection were not available. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were significantly more common with ceftazidime/avibactam (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.54, P = 0.05, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftazidime/avibactam is clinically and microbiologically as effective as carbapenems for treatment of infections in a setting of ∼25% ESBL-carrying Enterobacteriaceae. Safety of the drug should be further evaluated owing to a higher rate of SAEs compared with carbapenems. Further studies should assess the drug's effectiveness in the treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

摘要

背景

头孢他啶/阿维巴坦基于随机对照试验(RCT)的结果获得批准,用于治疗复杂性腹腔内和尿路感染(UTI)。尚未系统收集有关其治疗医院获得性感染或耐药病原体的有效性的数据。

方法

对评估头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与对照药物治疗任何感染的 RCT 进行系统评价和荟萃分析。主要结局是 30 天全因死亡率。计划了医院获得性感染和特定耐药表型的亚组。

结果

纳入了 7 篇文献(8 项试验,4093 名患者),基线时携带 ESBL 的肠杆菌科约占 25%。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与对照药物(主要是碳青霉烯类)相比,30 天全因死亡率、后期随访死亡率和临床反应无显著差异[相对风险(RR)1.10,95%CI 0.70-1.72,P=0.69;RR 1.23,95%CI 0.87-1.76,P=0.25;RR 0.98,95%CI 0.96-1.01,P=0.21,无显著异质性]。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦在尿路感染患者中显示出更高的微生物学反应率[RR 1.14,1.0-1.29,P=0.05,I2=51%]。对于头孢他啶耐药病原体的患者,临床反应无显著差异[RR 1.02,95%CI 0.94-1.10,P=0.66,I2=0%]。对于其他耐药病原体或医院获得性感染亚组的结果尚不可用。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的严重不良事件(SAE)发生率明显更高[RR 1.24,95%CI 1.00-1.54,P=0.05,I2=0%]。

结论

头孢他啶/阿维巴坦在携带 ESBL 的肠杆菌科约占 25%的情况下,在治疗感染方面与碳青霉烯类药物在临床和微生物学上同样有效。由于与碳青霉烯类药物相比,SAE 发生率更高,该药的安全性应进一步评估。应进一步研究评估该药物在治疗产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科中的有效性。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Aug 1;73(8):2021-2029. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky124.
2
Ceftazidime-avibactam or best available therapy in patients with ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa complicated urinary tract infections or complicated intra-abdominal infections (REPRISE): a randomised, pathogen-directed, phase 3 study.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦或最佳现有治疗在头孢他啶耐药肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌引起的复杂性尿路感染或复杂性腹腔内感染患者中的应用(REPRISE):一项随机、针对病原体的 3 期研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):661-673. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30004-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Colistin Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.多黏菌素与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):163-171. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix783.
4
Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与多利培南治疗复杂性尿路感染(包括急性肾盂肾炎):RECAPTURE,一项3期随机试验项目。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 15;63(6):754-762. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw378. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam as salvage therapy for treatment of infections due to OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦作为治疗产 OXA-48 碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科感染的补救治疗的疗效。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Nov 1;73(11):3170-3175. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky295.
6
Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pooled data from the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦对多重耐药肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌的临床活性:来自头孢他啶/阿维巴坦 III 期临床试验计划的汇总数据。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Sep 1;73(9):2519-2523. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky204.
7
Ceftazidime/avibactam versus carbapenems for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物治疗肠杆菌科引起的感染:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Dec;54(6):809-813. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
8
Is Ceftazidime/Avibactam an Option for Serious Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing ?: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和/或高产 AmpC 酶所致严重感染的选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Dec 16;65(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01052-20.
9
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Oct;52(4):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
10
Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Review in the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦:治疗严重革兰氏阴性细菌感染的综述。
Drugs. 2018 Apr;78(6):675-692. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0902-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms: A Prospective, Observational, Single-Center Study.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗耐碳青霉烯类微生物:一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;14(8):773. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080773.
2
Guava Leaf Extract Exhibits Antimicrobial Activity in Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) .番石榴叶提取物对广泛耐药菌(XDR)具有抗菌活性。
Molecules. 2024 Dec 28;30(1):70. doi: 10.3390/molecules30010070.
3
Disseminated organ and tissue infection secondary to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection for acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with ceftazidime-avibactam: Two case reports.
用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病继发于耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染的播散性器官和组织感染:两例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 10;104(2):e41195. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041195.
4
Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Meropenem/Vaborbactam for the Management of Enterobacterales Infections: A Narrative Review, Clinical Considerations, and Expert Opinion.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与美罗培南/法硼巴坦用于治疗肠杆菌科细菌感染:叙述性综述、临床考量及专家意见
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;12(10):1521. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101521.
5
Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与多黏菌素治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科感染患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infection. 2024 Feb;52(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02108-6. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Ceftazidime-Avibactam as Osteomyelitis Therapy: A Miniseries and Review of the Literature.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗骨髓炎:病例系列及文献综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;12(8):1328. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081328.
7
Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients.新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合及头孢地尔在重症患者中应用的理论依据与证据
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Jul 18;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01153-6.
8
Efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing .哌拉西林他唑巴坦与美罗培南治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌所致复杂性尿路感染(包括急性肾盂肾炎)的疗效和安全性比较
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 May 3;13:1093842. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1093842. eCollection 2023.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Carbapenems vs New Antibiotics for Treatment of Adult Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.碳青霉烯类药物与新型抗生素治疗成年复杂性尿路感染患者的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 10;9(5):ofaa480. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa480. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Efficacy of Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections Based on Meta-Analyses.基于荟萃分析的联合疗法治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌感染的疗效
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;11(4):524. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040524.