Suppr超能文献

根据2020 - 2021年抗菌药物耐药性趋势监测研究结果,亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦及对照药物对巴西医院分离菌株的活性。

activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators against isolates collected in Brazilian hospitals according to results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, 2020-2021.

作者信息

Bittencourt Amanda Azevedo, Faustino Vinicius Lima, Batista Paula de Mendonça, Leonel Lays Paulino, Paula Marina Della Negra de, Polis Thales José

机构信息

Global Medical & Scientific Affairs (GMSA), MSD Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.

Real World Evidence, IQVIA Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0254324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02543-24. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Abstract

The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program tested imipenem/relebactam (IMR) and comparators against a total of 2,258 non-duplicate clinical isolates of and ) collected across six Brazilian cities during 2020-2021. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution method and interpreted following Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility (BrCAST)/European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. isolates were screened for β-lactamase genes () by sequencing. The most frequent isolates identified among were ( = 471; 20.9%) and ( = 453; 20.1%). Susceptibility testing showed that >99% of isolates were susceptible to colistin ([COL], = 470; 99.8%), meropenem ([MEM], = 468; 99.4%), IMR ( = 468; 99.4%), and ceftazidime/avibactam ([CZA], = 468; 99.4%), whereas a high proportion of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates were susceptible to COL ( = 69; 98.6%), CZA ( = 67; 95.7%), MEM ( = 67; 95.7%), IMR ( = 67; 95.7%), and amikacin ([AMK], = 66; 94.3%). Overall, isolates were most susceptible to CZA ( = 414; 91.4%) and IMR ( = 411; 90.7%) and over 86.0% of MDR isolates were susceptible to CZA ( = 268; 87.3%) and IMR ( = 265; 86.3%). This study reported that IMR was one of the most effective β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations tested and demonstrated comparable activity to CZA and higher activity than COL against both the species tested.IMPORTANCEAs new mechanisms of antibiotic resistance continue to emerge, especially with the rise of carbapenem resistance, this study emphasizes the importance of assessing the current landscape of antimicrobial resistance to identify optimal therapeutic approaches. In this way, the publication of national data is significant for understanding local epidemiology to evaluate new drugs and make the best choice among the antimicrobials available in the hospital environment, both for critically ill patients with resistant bacterial infections.

摘要

监测抗菌药物耐药性趋势(SMART)监测项目对亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦(IMR)及对照药物针对2020年至2021年期间在巴西六个城市收集的总共2258株非重复临床分离株([具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2])进行了测试。抗菌药物敏感性通过临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)参考肉汤微量稀释法测定,并按照巴西抗菌药物敏感性委员会(BrCAST)/欧洲抗菌药物敏感性测试委员会(EUCAST)的断点进行解释。通过测序对分离株进行β-内酰胺酶基因([具体基因名称])筛查。在[具体细菌名称1]中鉴定出的最常见分离株是[细菌种类1](n = 471;20.9%)和[细菌种类2](n = 453;20.1%)。药敏试验表明,>99%的[具体细菌名称1]分离株对黏菌素([COL],n = 470;99.8%)、美罗培南([MEM],n = 468;99.4%)、IMR(n = 468;99.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/375c/12211073/10d870ef8419/spectrum.02543-24.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验