• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无味增稠剂?一项对比研究

[Tasteless thickening agents? A competitive comparison].

作者信息

Schulz Steffen, Scholz Veronika, Lehnert Bernhard

机构信息

FB Angewandte Gesundheitswissenschaften, Europäische Fachhochschule, Rostock, Deutschland.

Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.

出版信息

HNO. 2022 Aug;70(8):588-594. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01161-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-022-01161-1
PMID:35476148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9329396/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thickening of drinks is a standard procedure in dysphagia therapy. Among other things, this adaptive procedure aims to prevent posterior leakage and reduce the demands placed on retarded swallowing reflexes by decelerating boluses. Studies show that taste perception can induce a negative attitude towards thickened fluids in patients. This study investigates whether different thickeners differ in taste.

METHODS

The taste of eight arbitrarily chosen thickeners available on the German market were compared by 37 healthy adults. In the test setting, two thickeners combined with water competed against each other. Participants decided which one they preferred. Up to seven pairwise comparisons were performed by each participant. Overall, 224 comparisons were carried out. Based on these results, a relative taste grade was calculated using a probabilistic model and significance tests for differences were performed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in taste between the different products, presumably depending on their respective basic ingredients. To respect individual patient's preferences, different thickeners should be tried out in dysphagia therapy. It remains unclear whether thickeners' taste differences remain relevant once other liquids such as coffee, tea, or juice are thickened.

摘要

背景

饮品增稠是吞咽困难治疗中的标准程序。除其他方面外,这种适应性程序旨在防止食物向后渗漏,并通过减缓食团速度来减轻对迟缓吞咽反射的要求。研究表明,味觉感知会使患者对增稠液体产生负面态度。本研究调查不同的增稠剂在味道上是否存在差异。

方法

37名健康成年人对德国市场上任意选取的8种增稠剂的味道进行了比较。在测试环境中,两种与水混合的增稠剂相互竞争。参与者决定他们更喜欢哪一种。每位参与者最多进行7次两两比较。总共进行了224次比较。基于这些结果,使用概率模型计算相对味道等级,并进行差异显著性检验。

结果与结论

不同产品之间在味道上存在显著差异,可能取决于它们各自的基本成分。为尊重个体患者的偏好,在吞咽困难治疗中应尝试使用不同的增稠剂。目前尚不清楚一旦咖啡、茶或果汁等其他液体增稠后,增稠剂的味道差异是否仍然重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1abb/9329396/59be7d1780a2/106_2022_1161_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1abb/9329396/92c8dd15b7ab/106_2022_1161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1abb/9329396/59be7d1780a2/106_2022_1161_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1abb/9329396/92c8dd15b7ab/106_2022_1161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1abb/9329396/59be7d1780a2/106_2022_1161_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Tasteless thickening agents? A competitive comparison].无味增稠剂?一项对比研究
HNO. 2022 Aug;70(8):588-594. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01161-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Dysphagia management in Parkinson's disease: Comparison of the effect of thickening agents on taste, aroma, and texture.帕金森病吞咽障碍的管理:增稠剂对味道、气味和质地影响的比较。
J Food Sci. 2021 Mar;86(3):1039-1047. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15595. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
3
Comparative study of IDDSI flow test and line-spread test of thickened water prepared with different dysphagia thickeners.不同吞咽障碍增稠剂制备的增稠水的 IDDSI 流动试验与线扩散试验的比较研究。
J Texture Stud. 2018 Dec;49(6):653-658. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12360. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Sensory characteristics of beverages prepared with commercial thickeners used for dysphagia diets.用于吞咽困难饮食的商业增稠剂所制备饮料的感官特性。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Jul;106(7):1049-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.04.022.
5
Viscosity differences between thickened beverages suitable for elderly patients with dysphagia.适合吞咽困难老年患者的增稠饮料之间的粘度差异。
Dysphagia. 2014 Aug;29(4):483-8. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9533-x. Epub 2014 May 20.
6
Viscosity of dysphagia-oriented cold-thickened beverages: effect of setting time at refrigeration temperature.面向吞咽困难的冷增稠饮料的粘度:冷藏温度下静置时间的影响
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 May-Jun;50(3):397-402. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12141. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Taste preference and rating of commercial and natural thickeners.商业增稠剂和天然增稠剂的口味偏好及评级
Rehabil Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;30(6):239-46. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2005.tb00118.x.
8
Institutionalized elderly are able to detect small viscosity variations in thickened water with gum-based thickeners: should texture classifications be reviewed?机构化老年人能够检测到含有树胶增稠剂的增稠水中的小粘度变化:是否应该重新审查质地分类?
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02599-8.
9
Rheological characteristics of cold thickened beverages containing xanthan gum-based food thickeners used for dysphagia diets.用于吞咽困难饮食的含黄原胶基食品增稠剂的冷增稠饮料的流变学特性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jan;115(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Sensory and rheological characteristics of thickened liquids differing concentrations of a xanthan gum-based thickener.不同浓度黄原胶增稠剂增稠液的感官和流变特性。
J Texture Stud. 2017 Dec;48(6):571-585. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12268. Epub 2017 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Inadequate fluid intake in long term care residents: prevalence and determinants.长期护理机构居民的液体摄入量不足:患病率及决定因素。
Geriatr Nurs. 2018 May-Jun;39(3):330-335. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.11.004. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
2
Evaluation of the natural history of patients who aspirate.对误吸患者自然病史的评估。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Dec;127 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S1-S10. doi: 10.1002/lary.26854. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
Plugging the patient evidence gap: what patients with swallowing disorders post-stroke say about thickened liquids.
填补患者证据空白:中风后吞咽障碍患者对增稠液体的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):30-39. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12324. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Effect of Bolus Viscosity on the Safety and Efficacy of Swallowing and the Kinematics of the Swallow Response in Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: White Paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders (ESSD).推注黏度对口咽吞咽困难患者吞咽安全性和有效性及吞咽反应运动学的影响:欧洲吞咽障碍协会(ESSD)白皮书
Dysphagia. 2016 Apr;31(2):232-49. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9696-8. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
5
Clinical Variables Associated with Hydration Status in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Dysphagia.急性缺血性卒中吞咽困难患者水化状态相关的临床变量
Dysphagia. 2016 Feb;31(1):60-5. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9658-6. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
The influence of food texture and liquid consistency modification on swallowing physiology and function: a systematic review.食物质地和液体黏稠度改变对吞咽生理及功能的影响:一项系统评价
Dysphagia. 2015 Feb;30(1):2-26. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9578-x. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
7
[Management of dysphagia in internal intensive-care medicine].[内科重症监护医学中吞咽困难的管理]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2015 Apr;110(3):174-81. doi: 10.1007/s00063-014-0386-8. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
8
Thickening agents used for dysphagia management: effect on bioavailability of water, medication and feelings of satiety.用于吞咽困难管理的增稠剂:对水、药物生物利用度及饱腹感的影响。
Nutr J. 2013 May 1;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-54.
9
Dysphagia in the elderly: management and nutritional considerations.老年人吞咽困难:管理和营养考虑。
Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:287-98. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S23404. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
10
Consequence of dysphagia in the hospitalized patient: impact on prognosis and hospital resources.住院患者吞咽困难的后果:对预后和医院资源的影响。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug;136(8):784-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.129.