Suppr超能文献

乳房创伤:美国创伤中心十年的手术干预和结果。

Breast Trauma: A Decade of Surgical Interventions And Outcomes From us Trauma Centers.

机构信息

Division of Acute Care Surgery, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2023 Jun;89(6):2321-2324. doi: 10.1177/00031348221096580. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic breast injuries that require surgical intervention are rare and incompletely studied. The study objective was to define the incidence, mechanism/burden of injury, interventions, and outcomes after breast injuries requiring surgery nationally.

METHODS

All patients with breast trauma necessitating surgery were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) (2006-2017) using ICD-9 and -10 codes, without exclusions. Demographics, injury mechanism/severity, procedures, and outcomes (mortality, hospital length of stay [LOS, days], ICU LOS, and AIS >1 in >1 body regions, defining multisystem trauma) were compared with ANOVA or Chi-squared tests, as appropriate.

RESULTS

In total, 899 patients (.01% of NTDB) met study criteria. Median age was 41 years and most patients were female (n = 802, 89%). Penetrating trauma was the most common injury mechanism (n = 395, 44%), followed by blunt trauma (n = 369, 41%) and burns (n = 135, 15%). Median ISS was higher after blunt trauma than penetrating trauma or burns (10 vs 5 vs 4, P < .001). Laceration repair/mastotomy was the most common procedure among penetrating (n = 354, 90%) and blunt (n = 265, 72%) trauma patients, while mastectomy was the most common after burns (n = 126, 93%). Breast procedures varied significantly by mechanism (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Breast injuries requiring surgery are uncommon. Most occur following penetrating trauma, although injury severity is highest after blunt trauma and mortality is highest after burns. Procedure type, injury severity, and outcomes varied significantly by mechanism of injury, implying that breast trauma should be considered within the context of injury mechanism. These findings may assist with prognostication after breast trauma necessitating surgical intervention.

摘要

背景

需要手术干预的创伤性乳房损伤较为罕见,且研究尚不充分。本研究的目的是在全国范围内确定需要手术的乳房损伤的发生率、损伤机制/严重程度、干预措施和结局。

方法

使用 ICD-9 和 -10 代码从国家创伤数据库(NTDB)(2006-2017 年)中确定所有需要手术治疗的乳房创伤患者,不排除任何患者。使用 ANOVA 或卡方检验比较患者的人口统计学特征、损伤机制/严重程度、手术程序和结局(死亡率、住院时间[LOS,天]、ICU LOS 和 1 个以上身体区域的 AIS >1,定义为多系统创伤)。

结果

共有 899 例患者(NTDB 的 0.01%)符合研究标准。中位年龄为 41 岁,大多数患者为女性(n=802,89%)。穿透性创伤是最常见的损伤机制(n=395,44%),其次是钝性创伤(n=369,41%)和烧伤(n=135,15%)。与穿透性创伤或烧伤相比,钝性创伤的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)更高(10 比 5 比 4,P<0.001)。穿透性(n=354,90%)和钝性(n=265,72%)创伤患者最常见的手术方式是切开修复/乳房切除术,而烧伤患者最常见的手术方式是乳房切除术(n=126,93%)。不同损伤机制患者的乳房手术方式差异显著(P<0.001)。

结论

需要手术的乳房损伤并不常见。大多数发生在穿透性创伤后,尽管钝性创伤的损伤严重程度最高,烧伤的死亡率最高。损伤机制不同,手术类型、损伤严重程度和结局也存在显著差异,这表明在考虑乳房创伤时应考虑损伤机制。这些发现可能有助于预测需要手术干预的乳房创伤的预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验