• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出生地偏好与美国生育中心协会围产期数据注册中心 2007-2020 年母婴结局的关系。

Place of Birth Preferences and Relationship to Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Within the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, 2007-2020.

机构信息

Frontier University, Tucson, Arizona (Dr Jolles); American Association of Birth Centers Research Committee, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania (Drs Jolles, Niemcyzk, and Stapleton and Mss Sanders, Bauer, and Wright); Department of Nursing, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Montgomery); University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore (Dr Blankstein Breman); Boston College Connell School of Nursing, Boston, Massachusetts (Ms George); University of Maryland College of Social Work, Baltimore (Dr Craddock); and Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Ms Sanders and Dr Niemcyzk).

出版信息

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2022;36(2):150-160. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000647.

DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000647
PMID:35476769
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe sociodemographic variations in client preference for birthplace and relationships to perinatal health outcomes.

METHODS

Descriptive data analysis (raw number, percentages, and means) showed that preference for birthplace varied across racial and ethnic categories as well as sociodemographic categories including educational status, body mass index, payer status, marital status, and gravidity. A subsample of medically low-risk childbearing people, qualified for birth center admission in labor, was analyzed to assess variations in maternal and newborn outcomes by site of first admission in labor.

RESULTS

While overall clinical outcomes exceeded national benchmarks across all places of admission in the sample, disparities were noted including higher cesarean birth rates among Black and Hispanic people. This variation was larger within the population of people who preferred to be admitted to the hospital in labor in the absence of medical indication.

CONCLUSION

This study supports that the birth center model provides safe delivery care across the intersections of US sociodemographics. Findings from this study highlight the importance of increased access and choice in place of birth for improving health equity, including decreasing cesarean birth and increasing breastfeeding initiation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述客户对分娩地点的偏好的社会人口学差异及其与围产期健康结果的关系。

方法

描述性数据分析(原始数量、百分比和平均值)表明,在种族和族裔类别以及社会人口学类别(包括教育程度、体重指数、支付者状态、婚姻状况和孕次)中,对分娩地点的偏好存在差异。对有资格在分娩中心入院的医疗低风险生育人群进行了亚组分析,以评估在分娩时首次入院地点的产妇和新生儿结局的差异。

结果

虽然在样本中所有入院地点的总体临床结局均超过了全国基准,但仍存在差异,包括黑人及西班牙裔人群的剖宫产率较高。在没有医疗指征而更愿意在医院分娩的人群中,这种差异更大。

结论

本研究支持分娩中心模式在美国社会人口统计学中提供了安全的分娩护理。本研究的结果强调了增加获得和选择分娩地点的重要性,以改善健康公平,包括降低剖宫产率和增加母乳喂养的开始率。

相似文献

1
Place of Birth Preferences and Relationship to Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Within the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, 2007-2020.出生地偏好与美国生育中心协会围产期数据注册中心 2007-2020 年母婴结局的关系。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2022;36(2):150-160. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000647.
2
Race, ethnicity, and indications for primary cesarean birth: Associations within a national birth center registry.种族、民族与初次剖宫产指征:全国分娩中心注册研究中的关联。
Birth. 2024 Jun;51(2):353-362. doi: 10.1111/birt.12791. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.2012年至2014年间在“强力开端”分娩中心接受护理的生育医疗补助受益人的情况。
Birth. 2017 Dec;44(4):298-305. doi: 10.1111/birt.12302. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
4
The birth center model of care: Staffing, business characteristics, and core clinical outcomes.生育中心护理模式:人员配备、业务特征及核心临床结果
Birth. 2023 Dec;50(4):1045-1056. doi: 10.1111/birt.12745. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
5
Birth Outcomes of Women with Obesity Enrolled for Care at Freestanding Birth Centers in the United States.美国独立分娩中心就诊肥胖女性的分娩结局。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Jan;66(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13194. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
6
Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.生育中心的良好开端:母亲和新生儿的社会人口学特征、护理过程和结局。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):234-243. doi: 10.1111/birt.12433.
7
Prenatal care, birth outcomes and newborn hospitalization costs: patterns among Hispanics in New Jersey.产前护理、分娩结局及新生儿住院费用:新泽西州西班牙裔人群的模式
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jul-Aug;30(4):182-7, 200.
8
Strong Start Innovation: Equitable Outcomes Across Public and Privately Insured Clients Receiving Birth Center Care.强力启动创新:公平对待接受生育中心护理的公共保险和私人保险客户的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):746-752. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13439. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
9
Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes and labour and delivery-related charges among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.智力和发育障碍女性在分娩结局以及与分娩相关费用方面的种族和族裔差异。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Apr;63(4):313-326. doi: 10.1111/jir.12577. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
Low primary cesarean rate and high VBAC rate with good outcomes in an Amish birthing center.在一个阿米什分娩中心,剖宫产率较低,VBAC 率较高,且结局良好。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;10(6):530-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1403.

引用本文的文献

1
Strong Start Innovation: Equitable Outcomes Across Public and Privately Insured Clients Receiving Birth Center Care.强力启动创新:公平对待接受生育中心护理的公共保险和私人保险客户的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):746-752. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13439. Epub 2022 Dec 8.