Köle Merve, Sesli Çetin Emel, Şirin Mümtaz Cem, Cicioğlu Arıdoğan Buket
Edirne Sultan I. Murat State Hospital, Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Edirne, Turkey.
Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Isparta, Turkey.
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):230-250. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229804.
It has been reported that many antibiotics used today, including the carbapenem group, fail to treat Klebsiella pneumoniae infections effectively. Despite many studies in recent years, the definitive treatment for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections is still uncertain. In this study, it was aimed to investigate in vitro activities of colistin (COL) and meropenem (MEM), which are frequently used in the treatment of CRKP infections, and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), which is recently used in our country, alone or in combination against different CRKP isolates having different carbapenem resistance mechanisms andto analyze whether the presence of colistin resistance, which is an important problem in CRKP strains, influences the drug interaction results. This study was carried out in 42 K.pneumoniae isolates, which were isolated from various clinical samples as an infectious agent in Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Bacteriology Laboratory and whose carbapenem resistance was confirmed by carbapenemase inactivation test. The carbapenemase genes of the isolates were determined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of CRKP strains to CZA, MEM, and COL were determined by the broth microdilution method and in vitro synergy activities of dual combinations of these drugs were evaluated by checkerboard and time-kill methods. Statistical evaluation of categorical data was performed using Fisher's exact test, and p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in terms of difference between the groups. Of the 42 CRKP isolates 34 (81%) were only OXA-48 positive, 5 (11.9%) were OXA-48+NDM and 3 (7.1%) were OXA-48+KPC positive. In the checkerboard test, synergy was detected against 97.6% of the isolates both with CZA+MEM and CZA+COL combinations, whereas this rate was 50% with MEM+COL. In the time-kill test, synergy was detected with CZA+MEM and CZA+COL combinations in the OXA-48 positive isolate and OXA-48+KPC positive isolate, while synergy was detected with CZA+COL and MEM+COL combinations in the OXA-48+NDM positive isolate. There was no significant relationship between whether the isolates were resistant to colistin or not and the checkerboard test results of antibiotic combinations (pCZA+MEM= 0.33, pCZA+COL= 0.11, pMEM+COL= 0.61). Results of our study revealed that the most common carbapenemase type in CRKP isolates was OXA-48 in our hospital, and the combinations of CZA with MEM and COL had high potential for synergism against these isolates.
据报道,如今使用的许多抗生素,包括碳青霉烯类,都无法有效治疗肺炎克雷伯菌感染。尽管近年来进行了许多研究,但耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染的明确治疗方法仍不确定。在本研究中,旨在调查常用于治疗CRKP感染的黏菌素(COL)和美罗培南(MEM)以及我国最近使用的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)单独或联合针对具有不同碳青霉烯耐药机制的不同CRKP分离株的体外活性,并分析CRKP菌株中一个重要问题——黏菌素耐药性的存在是否会影响药物相互作用结果。本研究在42株肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中进行,这些分离株是从锡勒万·德米雷尔大学医学院医学微生物学系细菌学实验室的各种临床样本中作为感染病原体分离出来的,并且通过碳青霉烯酶失活试验确认了其对碳青霉烯类的耐药性。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法确定分离株的碳青霉烯酶基因。采用肉汤微量稀释法测定CRKP菌株对CZA、MEM和COL的抗菌敏感性,并通过棋盘法和时间杀菌法评估这些药物双重组合的体外协同活性。分类数据的统计评估采用Fisher精确检验,两组之间差异的p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。在42株CRKP分离株中,34株(81%)仅OXA-48阳性,5株(11.9%)为OXA-48+NDM,3株(7.1%)为OXA-48+KPC阳性。在棋盘试验中,CZA+MEM和CZA+COL组合对97.6%的分离株检测到协同作用,而MEM+COL组合的这一比例为50%。在时间杀菌试验中,在OXA-48阳性分离株和OXA-48+KPC阳性分离株中,CZA+MEM和CZA+COL组合检测到协同作用,而在OXA-48+NDM阳性分离株中,CZA+COL和MEM+COL组合检测到协同作用。分离株是否对黏菌素耐药与抗生素组合的棋盘试验结果之间无显著关系(pCZA+MEM = 0.33,pCZA+COL = 0.11,pMEM+COL = 0.61)。我们的研究结果表明,我院CRKP分离株中最常见的碳青霉烯酶类型是OXA-48,CZA与MEM和COL的组合对这些分离株具有很高的协同潜力。