Suppr超能文献

[使用Resapolymyxin NP试验测定大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中多粘菌素的敏感性]

[The Use of Resapolymyxin NP Test in Determining the Sensitivity of Colistin in Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates].

作者信息

Beşli Yeşim, Liste Ümran, Kırbaş Ekin, Sancak Banu

机构信息

VKV American Hospital, Clinic of Medical Microbiology, İstanbul, Turkey.

Birecik State Hospital, Clinic of Medical Microbiology, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.

出版信息

Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):349-356. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229813.

Abstract

Colistin is used as the last choice of drug in multidrug resistant gram-negative bacilli infections; therefore, accurate detection of colistin susceptibility has gained critical importance. Unfortunately, many of the widely used and practical methods in the clinical laboratory have various limitations for the determination of colistin susceptibility. This situation has led researchers to search for new methods to determine colistin susceptibility. In this study, the performance of the ResaPolymyxin NP test, which was developed for the rapid detection of colistin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, was evaluated for various Gram-negative bacteria for the determination of colistin susceptibility. For this purpose, the colistin MIC values of 105 Escherichia coli, and 196 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were determined by broth microdilution (BMD) using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and then ResaPolymyxin NP test was applied for each isolate. While 242 (%80.4) of the isolates included in the study were found to be susceptible to colistin with BMD, 214 (71.1%) of the isolates were found as sensitive to colistin with the ResaPolymyxin NP test. The categorical agreement rate for the ResaPolymyxin NP test was 85.7% for E.coli isolates, and 92.3% for K.pneumoniae isolates. The major error rate was 14.7% for E.coli, 10.8% for K.pneumoniae, whereas the very major error rate was 1.8% for K.pneumoniae. For ResaPolymyxin NP test, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were %98,3; %88.0; %66.7; and %99.5. In contrast to the available data about the ResaPolymyxin NP test, both the categorical agreement rate with BMD, and the very major and major error rates varied according to the isolate type, and it was concluded that the test performed relatively better in E.coli and K.pneumoniae isolates. Since the data obtained in this study are quite different from the previously published data, more comprehensive and multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the test effectiveness in order to recommend the use of the ResaPolymyxin NP test in clinical microbiology laboratories.

摘要

黏菌素被用作多重耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌感染的最后一线用药;因此,准确检测黏菌素敏感性变得至关重要。不幸的是,临床实验室中许多广泛使用且实用的方法在测定黏菌素敏感性方面存在各种局限性。这种情况促使研究人员寻找测定黏菌素敏感性的新方法。在本研究中,针对多种革兰氏阴性菌,评估了用于快速检测铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌分离株黏菌素敏感性的ResaPolymyxin NP试验在测定黏菌素敏感性方面的性能。为此,使用阳离子调节的 Mueller-Hinton肉汤通过肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)测定了105株大肠埃希菌和196株肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的黏菌素MIC值,然后对每个分离株进行ResaPolymyxin NP试验。在该研究纳入的分离株中,通过BMD发现242株(80.4%)对黏菌素敏感,而通过ResaPolymyxin NP试验发现214株(71.1%)对黏菌素敏感。ResaPolymyxin NP试验对大肠埃希菌分离株的分类符合率为85.7%,对肺炎克雷伯菌分离株为92.3%。大肠埃希菌的主要错误率为14.7%,肺炎克雷伯菌为10.8%,而肺炎克雷伯菌的极主要错误率为1.8%。对于ResaPolymyxin NP试验,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为98.3%、88.0%、66.7%和99.5%。与关于ResaPolymyxin NP试验的现有数据相比,其与BMD的分类符合率以及极主要和主要错误率均因分离株类型而异,得出该试验在大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中表现相对较好的结论。由于本研究获得的数据与先前发表的数据差异较大,需要更全面的多中心研究来评估该试验的有效性,以便推荐在临床微生物实验室中使用ResaPolymyxin NP试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验