• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线中央视网膜厚度对阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿疗效的影响:捷克共和国的真实世界证据。

EFFECT OF BASELINE CENTRAL RETINAL THICKNESS ON THE RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA WITH AFLIBERCEPT: REAL-LIFE EVIDENCE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.

出版信息

Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2022 Spring;78(2):64-70. doi: 10.31348/2022/9.

DOI:10.31348/2022/9
PMID:35477246
Abstract

AIM

Presentation of the 1-year results of aflibercept treatment in patients suffering from diabetic macular edema (DME) and comparison of the response to treatment of patients with different baseline central retinal thickness (CRT).

METHODS

This was a multicentre, retrospective observational study of a series of cases. Patients with DME were treated in a fixed regimen (5 injections at 1-monthly intervals and then injections at 2-monthly intervals). The period of follow-up was 12 months. The development of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT was evaluated. Measurements were performed prior to the commencement of treatment and then after 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The therapeutically naive group consisted of 82 eyes of 79 patients. The total cohort of patients was divided into 3 groups according to the baseline values of CRT. The first group was composed of 28 eyes with baseline CRT < 450 μm (34.1%), the second included 25 eyes with CRT in the range of 450-550 μm (30.5%), and the third group consisted of 29 eyes with baseline CRT > 550 μm (35.4%). The average baseline BCVA and SD in the first group was 66 ±7.1 letters ETDRS optotypes, and then 70 ±7 letters, 69.6 ±7.3 letters, and 71.3 ±7 letters at the follow-ups after 4, 8, and 12 months. The average baseline value of CRT and SD in the first group was 379 ±48.6 μm, and then 337.1 ±76.5 μm, 320.2 ±74.1 μm, and 315.1 ±62.2 μm after 4, 8, and 12 months. The average baseline BCVA and SD in the second group was 64.1 ±9.7 ETDRS letters, and then 66.9 ±10 letters, 70 ±9.9 letters, and 70.5 ±11.5 letters after 4, 8, and 12 months. The average baseline value of CRT and SD in the second group was 497.4 ±76.4 μm, and then 376.5 ±106.1 μm, 360.8 ±70 μm, and 351.3 ±91.3 μm after 4, 8, and 12 months. In the third group, the average baseline value of BCVA and SD was 59.7 ±10.4 ETDRS letters, and then 65 ±10.6 letters, 64.8 ±9.6 letters, and 67 ±10 letters after 4, 8, and 12 months. The average baseline value of CRT and SD in the third group was 639.4 ±79.6 μm, and then 396.7 ±147.1 μm, 416.9 ±139.8 μm, and 368.5 ±109.9 μm after 4, 8, and 12 months. All these changes were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Aflibercept treatment in a fixed regimen in patients suffering from DME results in a statistically significant improvement in BCVA and a decrease in CRT in the first year of treatment. Patients with a higher baseline CRT showed the best anatomical and functional results of the 1-year treatment with aflibercept.

摘要

目的

介绍接受阿柏西普治疗的糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者的 1 年治疗结果,并比较不同基线中央视网膜厚度(CRT)患者对治疗的反应。

方法

这是一项多中心、回顾性观察性研究,对一系列病例进行了研究。DME 患者采用固定方案(每月 1 次,共 5 次,然后每 2 个月 1 次)进行治疗。随访期为 12 个月。评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和 CRT 的变化。在开始治疗前和治疗后 4、6、8、10 和 12 个月进行测量。

结果

治疗初治组包括 79 例患者的 82 只眼。根据基线 CRT 值,将总患者队列分为 3 组。第一组 28 只眼,基线 CRT < 450 µm(34.1%);第二组 25 只眼,基线 CRT 在 450-550 µm 范围内(30.5%);第三组 29 只眼,基线 CRT > 550 µm(35.4%)。第一组平均基线 BCVA 和 SD 分别为 66 ±7.1 ETDRS 视标,然后在 4、8 和 12 个月的随访时分别为 70 ±7 个字母、69.6 ±7.3 个字母和 71.3 ±7 个字母。第一组平均基线 CRT 和 SD 分别为 379 ±48.6 µm 和 337.1 ±76.5 µm,然后在 4、8 和 12 个月的随访时分别为 337.1 ±76.5 µm、320.2 ±74.1 µm 和 315.1 ±62.2 µm。第二组平均基线 BCVA 和 SD 分别为 64.1 ±9.7 ETDRS 字母,然后在 4、8 和 12 个月的随访时分别为 66.9 ±10 个字母、70 ±9.9 个字母和 70.5 ±11.5 个字母。第二组平均基线 CRT 和 SD 分别为 497.4 ±76.4 µm 和 376.5 ±106.1 µm,然后在 4、8 和 12 个月的随访时分别为 376.5 ±106.1 µm、360.8 ±70 µm 和 351.3 ±91.3 µm。第三组平均基线 BCVA 和 SD 分别为 59.7 ±10.4 ETDRS 字母,然后在 4、8 和 12 个月的随访时分别为 65 ±10.6 个字母、64.8 ±9.6 个字母和 67 ±10 个字母。第三组平均基线 CRT 和 SD 分别为 639.4 ±79.6 µm 和 396.7 ±147.1 µm,然后在 4、8 和 12 个月的随访时分别为 396.7 ±147.1 µm、416.9 ±139.8 µm 和 368.5 ±109.9 µm。所有这些变化均具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。

结论

DME 患者接受阿柏西普固定方案治疗,在第 1 年治疗中可显著改善 BCVA,并降低 CRT。基线 CRT 较高的患者在接受阿柏西普治疗 1 年后的解剖学和功能结果最佳。

相似文献

1
EFFECT OF BASELINE CENTRAL RETINAL THICKNESS ON THE RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA WITH AFLIBERCEPT: REAL-LIFE EVIDENCE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.基线中央视网膜厚度对阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿疗效的影响:捷克共和国的真实世界证据。
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2022 Spring;78(2):64-70. doi: 10.31348/2022/9.
2
Two-year results of a combined regimen of aflibercept treatment in three types of choroidal neovascular membrane in the wet form of age-related macular degeneration: Real-life evidence in the Czech Republic.两年阿柏西普三联疗法治疗三种湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性脉络膜新生血管膜的结果:捷克共和国的真实世界证据。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;31(5):2488-2495. doi: 10.1177/1120672120971190. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
3
[Ranibizumab and aflibercept for diabetic macular edema-retrospective study with real-life data after 12 months].雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿——基于12个月真实数据的回顾性研究
Ophthalmologe. 2020 Jul;117(7):687-692. doi: 10.1007/s00347-019-01004-5.
4
One-Year Results of Using a Treat-and-Extend Regimen without a Loading Phase with Anti-VEGF Agents in Patients with Treatment-Naive Diabetic Macular Edema.在初治糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者中使用无负荷期的抗VEGF药物治疗并延长方案的一年结果
Ophthalmologica. 2019;241(4):220-225. doi: 10.1159/000495623. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
5
Comparison of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and dexamethasone implant monotherapy in treatment-naive eyes with diabetic macular edema: A 12-month real-life experience.比较雷珠单抗、阿柏西普和地塞米松植入物单药治疗初治糖尿病黄斑水肿眼:12 个月的真实体验。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 1;72(Suppl 3):S453-S458. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2310_23. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
6
Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Intravitreal Aflibercept: The AQUA Study.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的视力相关生活质量:AQUA研究。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Jul;3(7):567-575. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Ranibizumab versus aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 18-month results of a comparative, prospective, randomized study and multivariate analysis of visual outcome predictors.雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项比较、前瞻性、随机研究的 18 个月结果及视觉预后预测因素的多元分析。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2020 Dec;39(4):317-322. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2020.1802741. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
8
Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema in real-world: 36-month visual acuity and anatomical outcomes.真实世界中玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:36 个月视力和解剖学结局。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;31(3):1201-1207. doi: 10.1177/1120672120925034. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of diabetic macular edema: a real-world study.比较玻璃体内雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的真实世界研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;43(11):4171-4180. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02820-0. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
10
Real-world outcomes following 12 months of intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy in patients with diabetic macular edema in France: results from the APOLLON study.法国阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者 12 个月的真实世界结局:APOLLON 研究结果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;258(3):521-528. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04592-9. Epub 2020 Jan 2.