Suppr超能文献

每周行内镜下扩张作为处理复杂良性食管狭窄患者初始方法的临床疗效:488 次扩张的报告。

Clinical outcomes on weekly endoscopic dilations as the initial approach to manage patients with complex benign esophageal strictures: report on 488 dilations.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):7056-7065. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09248-0. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Success rate of endoscopic dilation (ED) of complex benign esophageal strictures (CBES) can be as low as 65%. Since EDs are usually performed at 2-4-week intervals, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of EDs done initially at weekly intervals.

METHODS

A cohort of patients with CBES (luminal diameter < 10 mm) underwent ED at weekly intervals and subsequent dilation intervals adjusted based on response. Weekly EDs were also re-initiated in those requiring additional interventions (electro-cautery/stents). Group A patients: Failed prior EDs done at ≥ 2-week intervals. Group B: CBES with no prior dilations. Success was defined as achieving and maintaining a luminal diameter of ≥ 14 mm and patient remaining dysphagia-free with minimal re-interventions.

RESULTS

488 EDs were performed on a cohort of 57 consecutive patients with CBES. Median follow-up was 4 years. Group A: 21 patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years; mean interval between prior failed dilations 17 ± 9 days). 57% of these patients achieved long-term success with weekly dilations (mean 8 ± 4.7 dilations/patient). Group B: 36 patients (mean age 61 ± 13 years, mean 6.5 ± 5.5 dilations/patient). Long-term success was 83.3% (P = 0.033). Despite weekly dilations, unable to achieve a diameter of 14 mm in 5 patients. AE: perforation 1 (0.2%), bleeding 1 (0.2%).

CONCLUSION

Significant proportion of patients with CBES who failed prior dilations done at ≥ 2-week intervals achieved dysphagia-free status by initiating weekly dilations. Hence, before considering other options (electro-cautery/stents), one can consider using this approach. This approach can also be used upfront in patients with newly diagnosed CBES.

摘要

背景

内镜扩张(ED)治疗复杂良性食管狭窄(CBES)的成功率可低至 65%。由于 ED 通常每 2-4 周进行一次,因此本研究的目的是评估每周间隔初始进行 ED 的临床效果。

方法

一组 CBES(管腔直径 < 10mm)患者接受每周一次的 ED,并根据反应调整后续扩张间隔。在需要额外干预(电灼/支架)的患者中也重新开始每周 ED。A 组患者:先前在 ≥ 2 周间隔进行的 ED 治疗失败。B 组:无先前扩张史的 CBES。成功定义为实现并维持管腔直径≥14mm,患者无吞咽困难且需要最小的再干预。

结果

对 57 例连续 CBES 患者进行了 488 次 ED。中位随访时间为 4 年。A 组:21 例患者(平均年龄 65 ± 13 岁;先前失败扩张的平均间隔为 17 ± 9 天)。这些患者中有 57%通过每周扩张实现了长期成功(平均每名患者 8 ± 4.7 次扩张)。B 组:36 例患者(平均年龄 61 ± 13 岁,平均每名患者 6.5 ± 5.5 次扩张)。长期成功率为 83.3%(P=0.033)。尽管进行了每周扩张,但仍有 5 名患者无法达到 14mm 的直径。AE:穿孔 1 例(0.2%),出血 1 例(0.2%)。

结论

在先前每 2-4 周进行扩张治疗失败的 CBES 患者中,相当一部分患者通过开始每周扩张实现了无吞咽困难状态。因此,在考虑其他选择(电灼/支架)之前,可以考虑采用这种方法。对于新诊断的 CBES 患者,也可以首先采用这种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验