Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):7056-7065. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09248-0. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Success rate of endoscopic dilation (ED) of complex benign esophageal strictures (CBES) can be as low as 65%. Since EDs are usually performed at 2-4-week intervals, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of EDs done initially at weekly intervals.
A cohort of patients with CBES (luminal diameter < 10 mm) underwent ED at weekly intervals and subsequent dilation intervals adjusted based on response. Weekly EDs were also re-initiated in those requiring additional interventions (electro-cautery/stents). Group A patients: Failed prior EDs done at ≥ 2-week intervals. Group B: CBES with no prior dilations. Success was defined as achieving and maintaining a luminal diameter of ≥ 14 mm and patient remaining dysphagia-free with minimal re-interventions.
488 EDs were performed on a cohort of 57 consecutive patients with CBES. Median follow-up was 4 years. Group A: 21 patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years; mean interval between prior failed dilations 17 ± 9 days). 57% of these patients achieved long-term success with weekly dilations (mean 8 ± 4.7 dilations/patient). Group B: 36 patients (mean age 61 ± 13 years, mean 6.5 ± 5.5 dilations/patient). Long-term success was 83.3% (P = 0.033). Despite weekly dilations, unable to achieve a diameter of 14 mm in 5 patients. AE: perforation 1 (0.2%), bleeding 1 (0.2%).
Significant proportion of patients with CBES who failed prior dilations done at ≥ 2-week intervals achieved dysphagia-free status by initiating weekly dilations. Hence, before considering other options (electro-cautery/stents), one can consider using this approach. This approach can also be used upfront in patients with newly diagnosed CBES.
内镜扩张(ED)治疗复杂良性食管狭窄(CBES)的成功率可低至 65%。由于 ED 通常每 2-4 周进行一次,因此本研究的目的是评估每周间隔初始进行 ED 的临床效果。
一组 CBES(管腔直径 < 10mm)患者接受每周一次的 ED,并根据反应调整后续扩张间隔。在需要额外干预(电灼/支架)的患者中也重新开始每周 ED。A 组患者:先前在 ≥ 2 周间隔进行的 ED 治疗失败。B 组:无先前扩张史的 CBES。成功定义为实现并维持管腔直径≥14mm,患者无吞咽困难且需要最小的再干预。
对 57 例连续 CBES 患者进行了 488 次 ED。中位随访时间为 4 年。A 组:21 例患者(平均年龄 65 ± 13 岁;先前失败扩张的平均间隔为 17 ± 9 天)。这些患者中有 57%通过每周扩张实现了长期成功(平均每名患者 8 ± 4.7 次扩张)。B 组:36 例患者(平均年龄 61 ± 13 岁,平均每名患者 6.5 ± 5.5 次扩张)。长期成功率为 83.3%(P=0.033)。尽管进行了每周扩张,但仍有 5 名患者无法达到 14mm 的直径。AE:穿孔 1 例(0.2%),出血 1 例(0.2%)。
在先前每 2-4 周进行扩张治疗失败的 CBES 患者中,相当一部分患者通过开始每周扩张实现了无吞咽困难状态。因此,在考虑其他选择(电灼/支架)之前,可以考虑采用这种方法。对于新诊断的 CBES 患者,也可以首先采用这种方法。