• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于双因素模型的项目间多维测试中反应准确性和时间的联合建模

Joint Modeling of Response Accuracy and Time in Between-Item Multidimensional Tests Based on Bi-Factor Model.

作者信息

Guo Xiaojun, Jiao Yuyue, Huang ZhengZheng, Liu TieChuan

机构信息

School of Education Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China.

School of Humanities, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 11;13:763959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.763959. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.763959
PMID:35478766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9035624/
Abstract

With the popularity of computer-based testing (CBT), it is easier to collect item response times (RTs) in psychological and educational assessments. RTs can provide an important source of information for respondents and tests. To make full use of RTs, the researchers have invested substantial effort in developing statistical models of RTs. Most of the proposed models posit a unidimensional latent speed to account for RTs in tests. In psychological and educational tests, many tests are multidimensional, either deliberately or inadvertently. There may be general effects in between-item multidimensional tests. However, currently there exists no RT model that considers the general effects to analyze between-item multidimensional test RT data. Also, there is no joint hierarchical model that integrates RT and response accuracy (RA) for evaluating the general effects of between-item multidimensional tests. Therefore, a bi-factor joint hierarchical model using between-item multidimensional test is proposed in this study. The simulation indicated that the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) algorithm works well in parameter recovery. Meanwhile, the information criteria showed that the bi-factor hierarchical model (BFHM) is the best fit model. This means that it is necessary to take into consideration the general effects (general latent trait) and the multidimensionality of the RT in between-item multidimensional tests.

摘要

随着基于计算机的测试(CBT)的普及,在心理和教育评估中收集项目反应时间(RTs)变得更加容易。RTs可以为受访者和测试提供重要的信息来源。为了充分利用RTs,研究人员投入了大量精力来开发RTs的统计模型。大多数提出的模型假定一个单维潜在速度来解释测试中的RTs。在心理和教育测试中,许多测试无论是有意还是无意都是多维的。项目间多维测试可能存在一般效应。然而,目前不存在考虑一般效应来分析项目间多维测试RT数据的RT模型。此外,也没有用于评估项目间多维测试一般效应的整合RT和反应准确性(RA)的联合层次模型。因此,本研究提出了一种使用项目间多维测试的双因素联合层次模型。模拟表明,哈密顿蒙特卡罗(HMC)算法在参数恢复方面表现良好。同时,信息准则表明双因素层次模型(BFHM)是最佳拟合模型。这意味着在项目间多维测试中,有必要考虑一般效应(一般潜在特质)和RT的多维性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3876/9035624/a4dfd50be369/fpsyg-13-763959-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3876/9035624/a4dfd50be369/fpsyg-13-763959-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3876/9035624/a4dfd50be369/fpsyg-13-763959-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Joint Modeling of Response Accuracy and Time in Between-Item Multidimensional Tests Based on Bi-Factor Model.基于双因素模型的项目间多维测试中反应准确性和时间的联合建模
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 11;13:763959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.763959. eCollection 2022.
2
Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.补偿性多维项目反应与反应时间的联合建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Nov;43(8):639-654. doi: 10.1177/0146621618824853. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Joint Testlet Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Paired Local Item Dependence in Response Times and Response Accuracy.用于响应时间和响应准确性中配对局部项目依赖性的联合测试认知诊断建模
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 25;9:607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00607. eCollection 2018.
4
Modeling Response Time and Responses in Multidimensional Health Measurement.多维健康测量中的响应时间和响应建模
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 29;10:51. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00051. eCollection 2019.
5
R-package LNIRT for joint modeling of response accuracy and times.用于响应准确性和时间联合建模的R包LNIRT
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Mar 30;9:e1232. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1232. eCollection 2023.
6
Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model.基于双因素模型的多维计算机自适应测试的最佳设计
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Dec;75(6):954-978. doi: 10.1177/0013164415575147. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.提高能力估计的精度:从反应时间中获取更多信息。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 Feb;71(1):13-38. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12104. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
8
The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.带有脆弱性的线性变换模型在项目反应时间分析中的应用。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013 Feb;66(1):144-68. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02045.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
9
Adaptive Testing With a Hierarchical Item Response Theory Model.基于分层项目反应理论模型的自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jan;43(1):51-67. doi: 10.1177/0146621618765714. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
10
A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.一种用于综合数据分析的稀疏多组数据分层多单维项目反应理论方法。
Psychometrika. 2015 Sep;80(3):834-55. doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9420-2. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.双因素模型在语言测试构念维度验证性因素分析研究中的地位
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 17;11:1357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357. eCollection 2020.
2
A Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Hierarchical Model Based on Cognitive Experiment.基于认知实验的速度-准确性权衡层次模型
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 8;10:2910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02910. eCollection 2019.
3
Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
补偿性多维项目反应与反应时间的联合建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Nov;43(8):639-654. doi: 10.1177/0146621618824853. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
Modeling Response Time and Responses in Multidimensional Health Measurement.多维健康测量中的响应时间和响应建模
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 29;10:51. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00051. eCollection 2019.
5
Joint Testlet Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Paired Local Item Dependence in Response Times and Response Accuracy.用于响应时间和响应准确性中配对局部项目依赖性的联合测试认知诊断建模
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 25;9:607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00607. eCollection 2018.
6
Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.提高能力估计的精度:从反应时间中获取更多信息。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 Feb;71(1):13-38. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12104. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
7
Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.建模反应时与准确率之间的条件相依性。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1126-1148. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9537-6. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
8
Joint Modeling of Ability and Differential Speed Using Responses and Response Times.使用反应和反应时间对能力与差异速度进行联合建模。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;51(4):540-53. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1171128. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
9
The shifted Wald distribution for response time data analysis.反应时间数据分析的移位 Wald 分布。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):309-27. doi: 10.1037/met0000066. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
10
A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life.生活质量的双因素模型与二阶模型比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Jun 1;41(2):189-225. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5.