• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双因素模型在语言测试构念维度验证性因素分析研究中的地位

The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.

作者信息

Dunn Karen J, McCray Gareth

机构信息

Assessment Research Group, British Council, London, United Kingdom.

School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 17;11:1357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357
PMID:32765335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7379375/
Abstract

For practical and theoretical purposes, tests of second language (L2) ability commonly aim to measure one overarching trait, general language ability, while simultaneously measuring multiple sub-traits (e.g., reading, grammar, etc.). This tension between measuring uni- and multi-dimensional constructs concurrently can generate vociferous debate about the precise nature of the construct(s) being measured. In L2 testing, this tension is often addressed through the use of a higher-order factor model wherein multidimensional traits representing subskills load on a general ability latent trait. However, an alternative modeling framework that is currently uncommon in language testing, but gaining traction in other disciplines, is the bifactor model. The bifactor model hypothesizes a general factor, onto which all items load, and a series of orthogonal (uncorrelated) skill-specific grouping factors. The model is particularly valuable for evaluating the empirical plausibility of subscales and the practical impact of dimensionality assumptions on test scores. This paper compares a range of CFA model structures with the bifactor model in terms of theoretical implications and practical considerations, framed for the language testing audience. The models are illustrated using primary data from the British Council's Aptis English test. The paper is intended to spearhead the uptake of the bifactor model within the cadre of measurement models used in L2 language testing.

摘要

出于实践和理论目的,第二语言(L2)能力测试通常旨在衡量一个总体特征,即通用语言能力,同时测量多个子特征(如阅读、语法等)。在同时测量单维和多维结构之间的这种矛盾可能引发关于所测量结构的确切性质的激烈争论。在第二语言测试中,这种矛盾通常通过使用高阶因子模型来解决,在该模型中,代表子技能的多维特征加载到一个通用能力潜在特征上。然而,一种目前在语言测试中不常见但在其他学科中越来越受关注的替代建模框架是双因子模型。双因子模型假设一个所有项目都加载其上的一般因子,以及一系列正交(不相关)的特定技能分组因子。该模型对于评估子量表的实证合理性以及维度假设对测试分数的实际影响特别有价值。本文从理论意义和实际考虑方面,为语言测试受众构建框架,将一系列验证性因子分析(CFA)模型结构与双因子模型进行比较。使用英国文化协会的Aptis英语测试的原始数据对模型进行说明。本文旨在率先在第二语言测试中使用的测量模型框架内推广双因子模型的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3201/7379375/993b0aae8362/fpsyg-11-01357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3201/7379375/20a918302056/fpsyg-11-01357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3201/7379375/993b0aae8362/fpsyg-11-01357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3201/7379375/20a918302056/fpsyg-11-01357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3201/7379375/993b0aae8362/fpsyg-11-01357-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.双因素模型在语言测试构念维度验证性因素分析研究中的地位
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 17;11:1357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357. eCollection 2020.
2
Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.使用双因素探索性结构方程建模框架研究早期算术能力的维度
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:680124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680124. eCollection 2021.
3
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.双因子模型和旋转:探索多维数据产生单一尺度分数的程度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
4
Validation of L2 grit among Chinese EFL high school students and its enduring effect on achievements: A bifactor model approach.中国高中英语学习者中L2毅力的验证及其对学业成绩的持久影响:一种双因素模型方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:971495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971495. eCollection 2022.
5
The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.双因素模型在解决健康结果测量中的维度问题方面的作用。
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:19-31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7. Epub 2007 May 4.
6
Construct Validation of Self-Determination Theory in Second Language Scale: The Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.第二语言量表中自我决定理论的结构效度:双因素探索性结构方程建模方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:732016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732016. eCollection 2021.
7
The second language trait emotional intelligence (L2-TEI) scale and its relation to language engagement.第二语言特质情绪智力(L2-TEI)量表及其与语言参与的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Oct;250:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104511. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
8
Viability of a MSQOL-54 general health-related quality of life score using bifactor model.使用双因子模型评估 MSQOL-54 一般健康相关生活质量评分的可行性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Sep 25;19(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01857-y.
9
Examining the underlying latent structure of the sports emotion questionnaire: Insights from the bifactor multidimensional item response theory.审视体育情感问卷的潜在结构:双因素多维项目反应理论的见解
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1038217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038217. eCollection 2022.
10
Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits: An Examination of a Bifactor Model and Measurement Invariance Between Those With and Without a Self-Reported Medical Condition.多维疑病症特质清单:对有和无自我报告医疗状况者的双因素模型和测量不变性的检验。
Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):206-215. doi: 10.1177/1073191117725173. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of the Multidimensional Perceived Autonomy Support Scale in Physical Education to Seventh-Tenth Grade Turkish Students: A Validity and Reliability Study.体育教育中多维感知自主支持量表对土耳其七至十年级学生的适应性研究:效度与信度研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 1;15(5):613. doi: 10.3390/bs15050613.
2
'Lock them up and throw away the key': an evaluation of the structure of punitive attitudes.“把他们关起来,扔掉钥匙”:惩罚性态度结构的评估
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Apr 7;32(2):213-239. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2296476. eCollection 2025.
3
Measuring the interpersonal component of the mentoring relationship: The mentorship working alliance scale - mentee version.

本文引用的文献

1
Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation.双因子和层次模型:规范、推断和解释。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:51-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
Finding Pure Sub-Models for Improved Differentiation of Bi-Factor and Second-Order Models.寻找纯子模型以改善双因素模型和二阶模型的区分度。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2017;24(3):402-413. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1261351. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.
衡量师徒关系中的人际因素:师徒工作联盟量表——学员版。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 16;9(1):e99. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.72. eCollection 2025.
4
EuleApp©: a computerized adaptive assessment tool for early literacy skills.EuleApp©:一种用于早期识字技能的计算机自适应评估工具。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1522740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1522740. eCollection 2025.
5
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of Competing Models with Adolescents from Portugal.心理健康连续体简表:对来自葡萄牙的青少年的竞争模型进行验证性因素分析(CFA)
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Mar 23;15(4):43. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15040043.
6
Psycometric Validation of an Instrument to Measure Person-Centred Teamwork in Hospital Settings.用于衡量医院环境中以患者为中心的团队合作的工具的心理测量学验证。
Nurs Res Pract. 2025 Apr 12;2025:2185757. doi: 10.1155/nrp/2185757. eCollection 2025.
7
Validation of the death reflection scale among older people.老年人死亡反思量表的验证
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 11;16:1541516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541516. eCollection 2025.
8
Validity and reliability of the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in one-year postoperative ankle fracture patients-a validation study.曼彻斯特牛津足部问卷(MOXFQ)在踝关节骨折术后一年患者中的有效性和可靠性——一项验证研究
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Feb 5;9(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00845-w.
9
The Infant and Toddler Curiosity Questionnaire: A Validated Caregiver-Report Measure of Curiosity in Children From 5 to 24 Months.婴幼儿好奇心问卷:一种经过验证的由照料者报告的5至24个月儿童好奇心测量工具。
Infancy. 2025 Jan-Feb;30(1):e70001. doi: 10.1111/infa.70001.
10
Cognitive Domains in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.国家社会生活、健康与老龄化项目中的认知领域
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Jan 18;80(Supplement_1):S91-S97. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae185.
评估双因子模型:计算和解释统计指数。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):137-50. doi: 10.1037/met0000045. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
4
Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.双因素统计指标在心理测量评估中的应用。
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(3):223-37. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
5
Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.特邀论文:双因素测量模型的重新发现
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Sep 1;47(5):667-696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.
6
Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality.多维性存在下心理测量的评分和建模。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):129-40. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
7
Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches.多方面构念的一般和特定方差建模:二因素模型与其他方法的比较。
J Pers. 2012 Feb;80(1):219-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x.
8
A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs.层次结构构造教程。
J Pers. 2012 Aug;80(4):796-846. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
9
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.双因子模型和旋转:探索多维数据产生单一尺度分数的程度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.