• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业切碎的长叶生菜在“保质期”前后的微生物质量。

The Microbial Quality of Commercial Chopped Romaine Lettuce Before and After the "Use By" Date.

作者信息

Liao Chao, Wang Luxin

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 11;13:850720. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.850720. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2022.850720
PMID:35479635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9036107/
Abstract

In the United States, due to the limited information about the microbial quality and safety of fresh produce after the labeled open dates, unnecessary discarding of fresh produce in good conditions and food loss have been caused. The aim of this study was to address this knowledge gap and evaluate the microbial quality of commercial chopped Romaine lettuce (RL) on the "Use By" dates (UBD) and 5 days after the "Use By" dates (UBD5). The microbial quality was evaluated using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Three brands of RL samples, from early and late harvest seasons, were purchased from local grocery stores and stored at 4°C until 5 days after their UBD. On the UBD and UBD5, bagged lettuce was opened, homogenized, diluted, and plated onto plate count agar and anaerobic agar to obtain total aerobic plate counts (APC) and total anaerobic plate counts (AnPC). For the culture-independent method, DNA was extracted from each sample homogenate and used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The culture-dependent results showed that there was no significant change in APC or AnPC between UBD and UBD5 samples. The APC and AnPC ranged from 5.71 ± 0.74 to 7.89 ± 0.10 Log CFU/g and 1.75 ± 0.08 to 7.32 ± 0.61 Log CFU/g, respectively. No significant difference in alpha diversity, based on observed features and Shannon index values, was detected between UBD and UBD5 samples using 16S rRNA sequencing. Similarly, no difference was observed in beta diversity based on the Jaccard distance matrixes and the weighted Unifrac distance matrixes. Taxonomic analysis revealed 128 genera in all RL samples. The top five genera were (with relative abundance ranging from 16.47 to 92.72%), (0-52.35%), (0-42.42%), (0.17-21.33%), and (0-24.30%). The differential abundance analysis based on the ANCOM test showed that no bacteria were detected to have significantly differential abundance in RL between UBD and UBD5. In summary, both the culture-dependent and culture-independent results showed that there was no significant difference in the microbial quality of RL before and shortly after the UBD.

摘要

在美国,由于关于新鲜农产品在标明的开封日期后微生物质量和安全性的信息有限,导致了处于良好状态的新鲜农产品被不必要地丢弃以及食物损失。本研究的目的是填补这一知识空白,并评估市售切碎的长叶生菜(RL)在“使用截止日期”(UBD)及“使用截止日期”后5天(UBD5)的微生物质量。使用依赖培养和不依赖培养的方法评估微生物质量。从当地杂货店购买了三个品牌的RL样本,分别来自早季和晚季收获,储存在4°C下直至其UBD后5天。在UBD和UBD5时打开袋装生菜,匀浆、稀释,然后接种到平板计数琼脂和厌氧琼脂上,以获得总需氧平板计数(APC)和总厌氧平板计数(AnPC)。对于不依赖培养的方法,从每个样本匀浆中提取DNA并用于16S rRNA基因测序。依赖培养的结果表明,UBD和UBD5样本之间的APC或AnPC没有显著变化。APC和AnPC分别在5.71±0.74至7.89±0.10 Log CFU/g和1.75±0.08至7.32±0.61 Log CFU/g范围内。使用16S rRNA测序,在UBD和UBD5样本之间,基于观察到的特征和香农指数值,未检测到α多样性的显著差异。同样,基于杰卡德距离矩阵和加权非加权组平均距离矩阵,在β多样性方面也未观察到差异。分类学分析在所有RL样本中揭示了128个属。排名前五的属是(相对丰度范围为16.47至)、(0至52.35%)、(0至42.42%)、(0.17至21.33%)和(0至24.30%)。基于ANCOM检验的差异丰度分析表明,在UBD和UBD5之间的RL中未检测到有显著差异丰度的细菌。总之,依赖培养和不依赖培养的结果均表明,RL在UBD之前和之后不久的微生物质量没有显著差异。 (注:原文中部分属名未完整给出,故翻译时也保留不完整状态)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/00230e1f20b7/fmicb-13-850720-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/de701a2f59e3/fmicb-13-850720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/4b35049ca4ac/fmicb-13-850720-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/bde2d5ebea20/fmicb-13-850720-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/f7e69a451026/fmicb-13-850720-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/00230e1f20b7/fmicb-13-850720-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/de701a2f59e3/fmicb-13-850720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/4b35049ca4ac/fmicb-13-850720-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/bde2d5ebea20/fmicb-13-850720-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/f7e69a451026/fmicb-13-850720-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/9036107/00230e1f20b7/fmicb-13-850720-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Microbial Quality of Commercial Chopped Romaine Lettuce Before and After the "Use By" Date.商业切碎的长叶生菜在“保质期”前后的微生物质量。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 11;13:850720. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.850720. eCollection 2022.
2
Aggregative Soil Sampling Using Boot Covers Compared to Soil Grabs From Commercial Romaine Fields Shows Similar Indicator Organism and Microbial Community Recoveries.使用靴套进行聚集土壤采样与从商业罗马生菜田中采集土壤样本相比,显示出相似的指示生物和微生物群落回收率。
J Food Prot. 2023 Nov;86(11):100177. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100177. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Comparative microbial analyses of hydroponic versus in-soil grown Romaine lettuce obtained at retail.对零售时获得的水培生菜与土培生菜进行的微生物比较分析。
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 12;8(10):e11050. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11050. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Aggregative Swab Sampling Method for Romaine Lettuce Show Similar Quality and Safety Indicators and Microbial Profiles Compared to Composite Produce Leaf Samples in a Pilot Study.在一项初步研究中,与复合生菜叶样本相比,用于罗马生菜的聚合拭子采样方法显示出相似的质量和安全指标以及微生物特征。
Foods. 2024 Sep 27;13(19):3080. doi: 10.3390/foods13193080.
5
Application of high-throughput pyrosequencing in the analysis of microbiota of food commodities procured from small and large retail outlets in a U.S. metropolitan area - A pilot study.高通量焦磷酸测序在美国大都市地区大小零售商店采购的食品商品中微生物群落分析的应用 - 一项初步研究。
Food Res Int. 2018 Mar;105:29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.057. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Disinfection of lettuce using organic acids: an ecological analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing.使用有机酸对生菜进行消毒:基于16S rRNA测序的生态学分析
RSC Adv. 2019 Jun 14;9(30):17514-17520. doi: 10.1039/c9ra03290h. eCollection 2019 May 29.
7
Microbial ecology of alfalfa, radish, and rapeseed sprouts based on culture methods and 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing.基于培养方法和 16S rRNA 微生物组测序的苜蓿、萝卜和油菜芽的微生物生态学研究。
Food Res Int. 2021 Jun;144:110316. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110316. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
[Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with extremely severe burns by 16S ribosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing technology].[16S核糖体RNA高通量测序技术分析特重度烧伤患者肠道微生物群的动态变化]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 20;36(12):1159-1166. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200518-00271.
9
Effects of temperature on paocai bacterial succession revealed by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods.温度对泡菜细菌演替的影响:培养依赖和非培养依赖方法的揭示。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2020 Mar 16;317:108463. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108463. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
10
Dynamics of bacterial communities in alfalfa and mung bean sprouts during refrigerated conditions.冷藏条件下苜蓿和绿豆芽中细菌群落的动态变化。
Food Microbiol. 2019 Dec;84:103261. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103261. Epub 2019 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiome-based classification models for fresh produce safety and quality evaluation.基于微生物组的分类模型在新鲜农产品安全和质量评价中的应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Apr 2;12(4):e0344823. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03448-23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
One Health Perspectives on Food Safety in Minimally Processed Vegetables and Fruits: From Farm to Fork.关于最低限度加工蔬菜和水果食品安全的“同一健康”视角:从农场到餐桌
Microorganisms. 2023 Dec 15;11(12):2990. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11122990.
3
Recombinant Lactococcus lactis Expressing Human LL-37 Prevents Deaths from Viral Infections in Piglets and Chicken.

本文引用的文献

1
Food Waste and Its Association with Diet Quality of Foods Purchased in South Florida.食物浪费及其与南佛罗里达州所购食物饮食质量的关联。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 24;13(8):2535. doi: 10.3390/nu13082535.
2
Comparison of droplet digital PCR vs real-time PCR for Yersinia enterocolitica detection in vegetables.用于检测蔬菜中肠炎耶尔森菌的液滴数字PCR与实时PCR的比较。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2021 Sep 16;354:109321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109321. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
Evaluation of Ceftazidime as an Antibiotic Supplement in Mannitol-Yolk-Polymyxin B Agar Used for Enumeration of Bacillus cereus in Ready-to-Eat Vegetables.
重组乳球菌表达人 LL-37 可预防仔猪和鸡的病毒感染死亡。
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2024 Dec;16(6):2150-2160. doi: 10.1007/s12602-023-10155-6. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
评价头孢他啶作为一种抗生素补充剂在甘露醇卵黄多黏菌素 B 琼脂中用于计数即食蔬菜中的蜡样芽胞杆菌。
J Food Prot. 2021 Oct 1;84(10):1698-1703. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-405.
4
Applications and Perceptions of Date Labeling of Food.食品日期标注的应用与认知
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2014 Jul;13(4):745-769. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12086.
5
Guidance on date marking and related food information: part 1 (date marking).日期标注及相关食品信息指南:第1部分(日期标注)。
EFSA J. 2020 Dec 2;18(12):e06306. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6306. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Microbiological Quality of Ready-to-Eat Leafy Green Salads during Shelf-Life and Home-Refrigeration.即食绿叶沙拉在保质期和家庭冷藏期间的微生物质量
Foods. 2020 Oct 8;9(10):1421. doi: 10.3390/foods9101421.
7
QIIME 2 Enables Comprehensive End-to-End Analysis of Diverse Microbiome Data and Comparative Studies with Publicly Available Data.QIIME 2 支持对多样化微生物组数据进行全面的端到端分析,并与公共可用数据进行比较研究。
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2020 Jun;70(1):e100. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.100.
8
q2-sample-classifier: machine-learning tools for microbiome classification and regression.q2样本分类器:用于微生物组分类和回归的机器学习工具。
J Open Res Softw. 2018;3(30). doi: 10.21105/joss.00934. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
Dynamics of bacterial communities in alfalfa and mung bean sprouts during refrigerated conditions.冷藏条件下苜蓿和绿豆芽中细菌群落的动态变化。
Food Microbiol. 2019 Dec;84:103261. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103261. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
10
Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.使用QIIME 2进行可重复、交互式、可扩展和可延伸的微生物组数据科学研究。
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.