Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dent Traumatol. 2022 Jun;38(3):170-174. doi: 10.1111/edt.12753. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
An accurate, clear, and easy-to-use traumatic dental injury (TDI) classification and definition system is a prerequisite for proper diagnosis, study, and treatment. However, more than 50 classifications have been used in the past. The ideal solution would be that TDIs are adequately classified within the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO). TDI classification provided by the 11th Revision of the ICD (ICD-11), released in 2018, and previous Revisions, failed to classify TDIs satisfactorily. Therefore, in December 2018, a proposal was submitted by Dr's Stefano Petti, Jens Ove Andreasen, Ulf Glendor, and Lars Andersson, to the ICD-11, asking for a change of the existing TDI classification. Proposal #2130 highlighted the TDI paradox, the fifth most frequent disease/condition neglected by most public health agencies in the world, and the limits of ICD-11 classification. Namely, injuries of teeth and periodontal tissues were located in two separate blocks that did not mention dental/periodontal tissues; infraction, concussion, and subluxation were not coded; most TDIs lacked description; and tooth fractures were described through bone fracture descriptions (e.g., comminuted, compression, and fissured fractures). These limitations led to TDI mis-reporting, under-reporting, and non-specific reporting by untrained non-dental healthcare providers. In addition, no scientific articles on TDIs, present in PubMed, Scopus, and Web-of-Science, used the ICD classification. Proposal #2130 suggested to adopt the Andreasen classification, the most widely acknowledged classification used in dental traumatology. The Proposal was reviewed by two WHO teams, two scientific Committees, one WHO Collaborating Center, and the Department of Non-Communicable Disease Prevention at WHO headquarters, and it underwent two voting sessions. In March 2022, the Andreasen classification was accepted integrally. A new entity was generated, called NA0D, "Injury of teeth or supporting structures" (https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1413338122). Hopefully, this will contribute to increasing the public awareness, and the dental profession's management, of TDIs.
一个准确、清晰且易于使用的创伤性牙外伤(TDI)分类和定义系统是正确诊断、研究和治疗的前提。然而,过去已经使用了 50 多种分类方法。理想的解决方案是将 TDI 充分分类在世界卫生组织(WHO)认可的国际疾病分类(ICD)中。2018 年发布的 ICD-11 第 11 次修订版和之前的修订版未能对 TDI 进行令人满意的分类。因此,2018 年 12 月,Stefano Petti 博士、Jens Ove Andreasen 博士、Ulf Glendor 博士和 Lars Andersson 博士向 ICD-11 提交了一份提案,要求更改现有的 TDI 分类。提案 #2130 强调了 TDI 悖论,这是世界上大多数公共卫生机构忽视的第五大最常见疾病/状况,以及 ICD-11 分类的局限性。即,牙齿和牙周组织的损伤位于两个不提及牙/牙周组织的单独模块中;未对牙挫伤、震荡伤和半脱位进行编码;大多数 TDI 缺乏描述;牙齿骨折通过描述骨骨折来描述(例如,粉碎性、压缩性和裂隙性骨折)。这些局限性导致 TDI 由未经培训的非牙科医疗保健提供者错误报告、漏报和非特异性报告。此外,在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web-of-Science 中,没有关于 TDI 的科学文章使用 ICD 分类。提案 #2130 建议采用 Andreasen 分类,这是牙外伤学中使用最广泛的分类。该提案由两个世卫组织团队、两个科学委员会、一个世卫组织合作中心和世卫组织总部非传染性疾病预防司进行了审查,并进行了两次投票。2022 年 3 月,Andreasen 分类被整体接受。一个新的实体被生成,称为 NA0D,“牙齿或支持结构的损伤”(https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1413338122)。希望这将有助于提高公众意识和牙科专业人员对 TDI 的管理。