German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Rostock/Greifswald, Ellernholzstrasse 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Department of General Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Loeffler-Straße 70, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 May;42(5):427-437. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01151-9. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
Low-value medications (Lvm) provide little or no benefit to patients, may be harmful, and waste healthcare resources and costs. Although evidence from the literature indicates that Lvm is highly prevalent in dementia, evidence about the financial consequences of Lvm in dementia is limited. This study analyzed the association between receiving Lvm and healthcare costs from a public payers' perspective.
This analysis is based on data of 516 community-dwelling people living with dementia (PwD). Fourteen Lvm were extracted from dementia-specific guidelines, the German equivalent of the Choosing Wisely campaign, and the PRISCUS list. Healthcare utilization was retrospectively assessed via face-to-face interviews with caregivers and monetarized by standardized unit costs. Associations between Lvm and healthcare costs were analyzed using multiple linear regression models.
Every third patient (n = 159, 31%) received Lvm. Low-value antiphlogistics, analgesics, anti-dementia drugs, sedatives and hypnotics, and antidepressants alone accounted for 77% of prescribed Lvm. PwD who received Lvm were significantly less cognitively impaired than those not receiving Lvm. Receiving Lvm was associated with higher medical care costs (b = 2959 €; 95% CI 1136-4783; p = 0.001), particularly due to higher hospitalization (b = 1911 €; 95% CI 376-3443; p = 0.015) and medication costs (b = 905 €; 95% CI 454-1357; p < 0.001).
Lvm were prevalent, more likely occurring in the early stages of dementia, and cause financial harm for payers due to higher direct medical care costs. Further research is required to derive measures to prevent cost-driving Lvm in primary care, that is, implementing deprescribing interventions and moving health expenditures towards higher value resource use.
低价值药物(Lvm)对患者几乎没有益处,甚至可能有害,浪费医疗资源和成本。尽管文献中的证据表明 Lvm 在痴呆症中非常普遍,但关于痴呆症中 Lvm 的财务后果的证据有限。本研究从公共支付者的角度分析了接受 Lvm 与医疗保健成本之间的关系。
本分析基于来自痴呆症特定指南、德国选择明智运动和 PRISCUS 清单的 14 种 Lvm 的 516 名居住在社区中的痴呆症患者(PwD)的数据。通过与护理人员进行面对面访谈来回顾性评估医疗保健利用情况,并通过标准化单位成本进行货币化。使用多元线性回归模型分析 Lvm 与医疗保健成本之间的关联。
每三个患者(n=159,31%)接受了 Lvm。单独使用低价值抗炎药、镇痛药、抗痴呆药、镇静剂和催眠药以及抗抑郁药就占了处方 Lvm 的 77%。接受 Lvm 的 PwD 认知障碍程度明显低于未接受 Lvm 的患者。接受 Lvm 与更高的医疗费用相关(b=2959 欧元;95%CI 1136-4783;p=0.001),特别是由于更高的住院治疗(b=1911 欧元;95%CI 376-3443;p=0.015)和药物治疗费用(b=905 欧元;95%CI 454-1357;p<0.001)。
Lvm 很普遍,在痴呆症的早期阶段更常见,并且由于直接医疗保健成本较高,对支付者造成经济损害。需要进一步研究,以制定在初级保健中预防成本驱动的 Lvm 的措施,即实施减少用药干预措施,并将卫生支出转向更高价值的资源利用。