Department Translational Health Care Research, German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Ellernholzstrasse 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Department of General Business Administration and Health Care Management, Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jan;19(1):87-102. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0869-7. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
The objectives of this cross-sectional analysis were to determine healthcare resource utilization and cost for community-dwelling patients with dementia (PWD) from a payer's and societal perspective, and to analyze the associations between costs and sociodemographic and clinical variables. Analysis of healthcare costs from a payer's perspective was based on a sample of 425 PWD, analysis of healthcare costs from societal perspective on a subsample of 254 PWD and their informal caregivers. Frequency of healthcare resource utilization was assessed by means of questionnaires. Informal care and productivity losses were assessed by using the Resource Utilization in Dementia questionnaire (RUD). Costs were monetarized using standardized unit costs. To analyze the associations, multiple linear regression models were used. Total annual costs per PWD valued 7016€ from a payer's and 25,877€ from a societal perspective, meaning that societal cost is approximately three and a half times as much as payer's expenditures. Costs valuated 5456 € for medical treatments, 1559 € for formal care, 18,327€ for informal care. Productivity losses valued 1297€ for PWD caregivers. Informal care could vary substantially (-21%; +33%) concerning different valuation methods. Medical care costs decreased significantly with progression of dementia and with age. Costs of care double over the stages of dementia. Formal care costs were significantly higher for PWD living alone and informal care costs significantly lower for PWD with an employed caregiver. For all cost categories, deficits in daily living activities were major cost drivers.
本横断面分析的目的是从支付者和社会角度确定居住在社区的痴呆症患者(PWD)的医疗资源利用和成本,并分析成本与社会人口学和临床变量之间的关联。从支付者角度分析医疗成本的依据是 425 名 PWD 的样本,从社会角度分析医疗成本的依据是 254 名 PWD 及其非正规护理人员的子样本。通过问卷调查评估医疗资源的利用频率。通过使用资源利用在痴呆症问卷(RUD)评估非正规护理和生产力损失。使用标准化单位成本将成本货币化。为了分析关联,使用了多元线性回归模型。从支付者角度看,每位 PWD 的年度总成本为 7016 欧元,从社会角度看为 25877 欧元,这意味着社会成本大约是支付者支出的三倍半。医疗费用为 5456 欧元,正规护理费用为 1559 欧元,非正规护理费用为 18327 欧元。PWD 护理人员的生产力损失为 1297 欧元。非正规护理费用根据不同的估值方法可能会有很大差异(-21%;+33%)。医疗费用随着痴呆症的进展和年龄的增长而显著下降。护理成本在痴呆症的各个阶段翻了一番。独居的 PWD 的护理费用明显较高,有受雇护理人员的 PWD 的非正规护理费用明显较低。对于所有成本类别,日常生活活动的缺陷都是主要的成本驱动因素。