McMillan Catriona
School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.
Med Law Rev. 2022 Sep 6;30(3):410-433. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac006.
Concurrent with the rise of digital health and personal health tracking technologies, a market has also emerged of products targeted specifically at women: 'femtech'. This article is motivated by the concern that insufficient regulatory attention has been devoted to this growing market, and that extant ambiguity in the regulation of femtech leaves its users at risk of relying on technologies of as-yet unproven worth. It is posited that femtech profoundly disrupts well-established regulatory mechanisms of protection in ways that mean that these silos of protection will not be adequate. This is because regulation, as it is currently constructed, is insufficiently sensitive to feminist perspectives regarding what these technologies mean for women. As a result, the regulatory sphere in which femtech operates fundamentally fails to ensure that the health and safety of femtech users are protected as this market continues to expand. To counteract this, the argument is made that an appropriate regulatory response to femtech must respond to the distinctive unmet need in the regulation of this technological realm and the acute risk that femtech poses. This must include a multidimensional whole-system approach grounded in feminist perspectives on health, fertility, and technology.
随着数字健康和个人健康追踪技术的兴起,一个专门针对女性的产品市场也应运而生:“女性科技”。本文的出发点是担心监管部门对这个不断发展的市场关注不足,而且女性科技监管方面现存的模糊性使用户面临依赖价值尚未得到证实的技术的风险。有人认为,女性科技以一种意味着现有的保护机制将不足够的方式深刻地扰乱了既定的保护监管机制。这是因为目前构建的监管对女权主义者关于这些技术对女性意味着什么的观点不够敏感。因此,随着这个市场的持续扩张,女性科技所处的监管领域根本无法确保女性科技用户的健康和安全得到保护。为了应对这一问题,有人认为,对女性科技的适当监管回应必须应对这一技术领域监管中独特的未满足需求以及女性科技带来的严重风险。这必须包括一种基于女权主义对健康、生育和技术观点的多维度全系统方法。