Department of Psychology.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Jun;76(2):75-86. doi: 10.1037/cep0000281. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
Montagliani and Hockley (2019) presented evidence that item-method directed forgetting not only leads to worse recognition of forget-cued targets than remember-cued targets but also better rejection of foils associated with forget-cued targets than remember-cued targets. Based on that result, they proposed that participants elaboratively encode more category-level information about R-cued targets. We present a retrieval-based explanation of the result within an instance-based memory model. The model imports word representations from two distributional semantic models, latent semantic analysis (LSA) and random permutation model (RPM), into an instance-based model of memory, MINERVA 2. The model reproduced Montagliani and Hockley's results without requiring assumptions about elaborated encoding of category-level information at study. The simulations demonstrate that whereas Montagliani and Hockley's findings are consistent with an account grounded in elaborated encoding of words at study, the results do not force that conclusion. Instead, better encoding of remember-cued targets at study establishes the conditions for retrieval-time effects at test to produce a corresponding influence on false recognition for category-related foils. Our model can be used as a formal tool to think about and study the incidental consequences of item directed forgetting in recognition memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
蒙塔利亚尼和霍克利(2019 年)提出证据表明,项目-方法定向遗忘不仅导致被遗忘提示的目标的识别比被记住提示的目标更差,而且与被遗忘提示的目标相关的错误拒绝比被记住提示的目标更好。基于这一结果,他们提出参与者对 R 提示目标进行了更详尽的类别水平信息编码。我们在基于检索的记忆模型内提出了对该结果的解释。该模型从两个分布语义模型(潜在语义分析(LSA)和随机排列模型(RPM))将单词表示导入基于实例的记忆模型 MINERVA 2 中。该模型再现了蒙塔利亚尼和霍克利的结果,而无需对学习时的类别水平信息进行详细编码的假设。模拟表明,尽管蒙塔利亚尼和霍克利的发现与基于学习时单词的详细编码的解释一致,但结果并不强迫得出该结论。相反,在学习时更好地编码记住提示的目标为测试时的检索时间效应创造了条件,从而对类别相关错误的虚假识别产生相应的影响。我们的模型可以用作一种正式工具,用于思考和研究识别记忆中项目定向遗忘的偶然后果。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。