• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定向遗忘与产生效应。

Directed Forgetting and the Production Effect.

作者信息

Spear Jackie, Reid J Nick, Guitard Dominic, Jamieson Randall K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitob, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of Northern British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2024 Sep;71(5):278-297. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000630. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000630
PMID:39659277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11868810/
Abstract

The item-based directed-forgetting effect is explained as a difference in how strongly people encode remember-cued over forget-cued targets. In contrast, the production effect is typically explained as a difference in the distinctiveness of the memory of produced over unproduced targets. The procedural alignment of the two effects - directing participants to remember or forget, produce or not - coupled with their different theoretical explanations (i.e., strength vs. distinctiveness) presents an opportunity to investigate common versus differential effects of elaborative encoding. This study aims to bridge the gap between these two well-established phenomena by comparing the differences in directed forgetting and the production effect in the context of recognition. Mixed- and pure-list designs were utilized to provide an index of each of these mechanisms in both procedures. Along with a standard production effect and directed forgetting effect in the mixed-list conditions, we found evidence for strength primarily driving results in both procedures. Results are explained using a global matching model of recognition memory, MINERVA 2, by assuming varying levels of encoding strength in relation to task demands. Critically, we obtain the best fit using a strength mechanism over a combined strength and distinctiveness mechanism for our data.

摘要

基于项目的定向遗忘效应被解释为人们对记忆线索提示的目标和遗忘线索提示的目标进行编码的强度差异。相比之下,生成效应通常被解释为对生成的目标和未生成的目标的记忆独特性差异。这两种效应的程序匹配——引导参与者记忆或遗忘、生成或不生成——再加上它们不同的理论解释(即强度与独特性),为研究精细化编码的共同效应和差异效应提供了契机。本研究旨在通过比较识别情境下定向遗忘和生成效应的差异,弥合这两个已被充分证实的现象之间的差距。混合列表设计和纯列表设计被用于为这两种程序中的每种机制提供指标。除了在混合列表条件下出现标准的生成效应和定向遗忘效应外,我们还发现证据表明强度在这两种程序中都是驱动结果的主要因素。通过假设与任务需求相关的不同编码强度水平,使用识别记忆的全局匹配模型MINERVA 2对结果进行了解释。至关重要的是,对于我们的数据,使用强度机制比使用强度和独特性相结合的机制能获得更好的拟合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/be638fa9e014/zea_71_5_278_fig9a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/d420b0d1d677/zea_71_5_278_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/3ec63d9fa7d4/zea_71_5_278_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/831be6f34633/zea_71_5_278_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/a9f99f14efd5/zea_71_5_278_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/e17bc5c76572/zea_71_5_278_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/38562009acfe/zea_71_5_278_fig6a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/ca78785aff0c/zea_71_5_278_fig7a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/3e50222749fe/zea_71_5_278_fig8a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/be638fa9e014/zea_71_5_278_fig9a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/d420b0d1d677/zea_71_5_278_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/3ec63d9fa7d4/zea_71_5_278_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/831be6f34633/zea_71_5_278_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/a9f99f14efd5/zea_71_5_278_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/e17bc5c76572/zea_71_5_278_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/38562009acfe/zea_71_5_278_fig6a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/ca78785aff0c/zea_71_5_278_fig7a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/3e50222749fe/zea_71_5_278_fig8a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc9/11868810/be638fa9e014/zea_71_5_278_fig9a.jpg

相似文献

1
Directed Forgetting and the Production Effect.定向遗忘与产生效应。
Exp Psychol. 2024 Sep;71(5):278-297. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000630. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Item-method directed forgetting: Effects at retrieval?项目-方法导向遗忘:在检索时的影响?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:116-123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
3
In support of selective rehearsal: Double-item presentation in item-method directed forgetting.支持选择性复述:项目-方法导向遗忘中的双项目呈现。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Jun;27(3):529-535. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01723-w.
4
A computational account of item-based directed forgetting for nonwords: Incorporating orthographic representations in MINERVA 2.基于项目的非词定向遗忘的计算解释:MINERVA 2 中纳入正字法表征
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1785-1806. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01433-3. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Sex, age, and sex hormones affect recall of words in a directed forgetting paradigm.性别、年龄和性激素会影响定向遗忘范式中的单词记忆。
J Neurosci Res. 2017 Jan 2;95(1-2):251-259. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23973.
6
A computational model of item-based directed forgetting.基于项目的定向遗忘的计算模型。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Jun;76(2):75-86. doi: 10.1037/cep0000281. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
7
Directed forgetting of pictures of everyday objects.对日常物体图片的定向遗忘。
J Vis. 2022 Sep 2;22(10):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.10.8.
8
Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting.后测编码量预测定向遗忘量。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):54-65. doi: 10.1037/a0017406.
9
Source reinstatement in item-method directed forgetting influences recognition strategies.源项再认在项目-方法定向遗忘中影响识别策略。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Sep;76(3):193-200. doi: 10.1037/cep0000288. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
10
Selective directed forgetting in children.儿童的选择性定向遗忘
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Mar;167:433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Singing Does Not Necessarily Improve Memory More Than Reading Aloud.唱歌并不一定比大声朗读更能提高记忆力。
Exp Psychol. 2024 Jan;71(1):33-50. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000614.
2
A Feature-Space Theory of the Production Effect in Recognition.识别中产生效应的特征空间理论。
Exp Psychol. 2024 Jan;71(1):64-82. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000611.
3
The prod eff: Partially producing items moderates the production effect.部分生产效应:部分生产物品会缓和生产效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):373-379. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02360-9. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
A computational account of item-based directed forgetting for nonwords: Incorporating orthographic representations in MINERVA 2.基于项目的非词定向遗忘的计算解释:MINERVA 2 中纳入正字法表征
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1785-1806. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01433-3. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Production improves recognition and reduces intrusions in between-subject designs: An updated meta-analysis.在被试间设计中,提高被试的识别率和减少内源性干扰:一项更新的元分析。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2023 Mar;77(1):35-44. doi: 10.1037/cep0000302. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
A computational model of item-based directed forgetting.基于项目的定向遗忘的计算模型。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Jun;76(2):75-86. doi: 10.1037/cep0000281. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
7
The Production Effect Interacts With Serial Positions.产生效应与序列位置相互作用。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Jan;69(1):12-22. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000540. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
8
The production effect over the long term: Modeling distinctiveness using serial positions.长期的产生效应:利用序列位置对独特性进行建模。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Dec;48(12):1797-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001093. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
Directed forgetting in associative memory: Dissociating item and associative impairment.导向遗忘在联想记忆中的作用:项目和联想损伤的分离。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jan;48(1):29-42. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001027. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
10
Emotional memories are (usually) harder to forget: A meta-analysis of the item-method directed forgetting literature.情绪记忆(通常)更难忘记:项目-方法定向遗忘文献的元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1313-1326. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01914-z. Epub 2021 Apr 12.