Johnson Anna D, Schochet Owen N, Martin Anne, Castle Sherri, Horm Diane, Phillips Deborah A
Department of Psychology, Georgetown University.
Early Childhood Education Institute, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa.
Dev Psychol. 2022 May;58(5):848-865. doi: 10.1037/dev0001335.
Decades of research suggest that both Head Start and public pre-kindergarten (pre-k) programs boost low-income preschoolers' kindergarten skills. What is not yet well understood is whether there are relative advantages of transitioning from Head Start after 1 year into a school-based public pre-k program for the year immediately before kindergarten for children's developing cognitive and self-regulation skills. This is an important question, because in many communities Head Start and school-based pre-k programs provide competing early education options for low-income 4-year-olds, leaving policymakers, educators, and parents wondering which pathway best promotes the mix of skills predictive of success in elementary school. Only one study-conducted prior to significant recent demographic and policy changes affecting early education and focused exclusively on cognitive outcomes-has addressed this question. We extend that work with contemporary data on 362 low-income children to assess the relative advantages for both kindergarten cognitive and self-regulatory skills of 2 years of Head Start before kindergarten versus transitioning from Head Start to school-based pre-k at age 4. The child sample was evenly split by gender and diverse in race/ethnicity (50% Hispanic/Latinx; 36% Black; 7% White). Results showed that children who transitioned after 1 year of Head Start to school-based pre-k at age 4 showed marginally higher kindergarten literacy (d = .13) and significantly greater math (d = .18) skills than children who remained in Head Start for a second year, but there were no significant differences in kindergarten self-regulatory skills. Implications for contemporary, pressing policy issues are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
数十年的研究表明,“启智计划”和公立学前班项目都能提升低收入家庭学龄前儿童进入幼儿园时的技能水平。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,对于儿童认知和自我调节技能的发展而言,在参加一年“启智计划”后,于幼儿园入学前一年转入公立学校学前班项目,是否具有相对优势。这是一个重要问题,因为在许多社区,“启智计划”和公立学校学前班项目为低收入家庭的4岁儿童提供了相互竞争的早期教育选择,这让政策制定者、教育工作者和家长们都在思考,哪条途径最能促进那些对小学学业成功具有预测作用的技能组合的发展。此前仅有一项研究探讨过这个问题,该研究是在近期影响早期教育的重大人口和政策变化之前进行的,并且仅专注于认知结果。我们利用362名低收入儿童的当代数据扩展了这项研究,以评估在幼儿园入学前接受两年“启智计划”与4岁时从“启智计划”转入公立学校学前班项目,对于儿童幼儿园认知和自我调节技能的相对优势。儿童样本按性别平均分配,种族/族裔多样(50%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔;36%为黑人;7%为白人)。结果显示,在参加一年“启智计划”后于4岁转入公立学校学前班项目的儿童,在幼儿园识字方面略高于(d = 0.13)仍在“启智计划”中接受第二年教育的儿童,在数学方面显著更高(d = 0.18),但在幼儿园自我调节技能方面没有显著差异。文中还讨论了对当代紧迫政策问题的启示。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)