Evidence in Motion, Story City, Iowa, United States of America.
Department of Physical Therapy, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267157. eCollection 2022.
Research suggests that attendance by physical therapists at continuing education (CE) targeting the management of low back pain (LBP) and neck pain does not result in positive impacts on clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine if therapists attending a self-paced 3-hour online Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) program was associated with any observed changes to patient outcomes and also clinical practice.
Participants were 25 different physical therapists who treated 3,705 patients with low back pain (LBP) or neck pain before and after they had completed an online PNE CE course. Change in outcomes measures of pain and disability at discharge were compared for the patients treated before and after the therapist training. Clinical practice patterns of the therapists, including total treatment visits, duration of care, total units billed, average units billed per visit, percentage of 'active' billing units and percentage of 'active and manual' billing units, were also compared for the patient care episodes before and after the therapist training.
There was no significant difference for change in pain scores at discharge for patients treated after therapist CE training compared to those treated before regardless of the condition (LBP or neck pain). However, patients with LBP who were treated after therapist CE training did report greater improvement in their disability scores. Also after CE training, for each episode of care, therapists tended to use less total visits, billed fewer units per visit, and billed a greater percentage of more 'active' and 'active and manual' billing units.
Attending an online 3-hour CE course on PNE resulted in improved disability scores for patients with LBP, but not for those with neck pain. Changes in clinical behavior by the therapists included using less visits, billing fewer total units, and shifting to more active and manual therapy interventions. Further prospective studies with control groups should investigate the effect of therapist CE on patient outcomes and clinical practice.
研究表明,物理治疗师参加针对下背痛(LBP)和颈痛管理的继续教育(CE)并不会对临床结果产生积极影响。本研究旨在确定治疗师参加自我指导的 3 小时在线疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)计划是否与观察到的患者结果和临床实践的变化有关。
共有 25 名不同的物理治疗师参与了这项研究,他们在完成在线 PNE CE 课程前后,分别治疗了 3705 名患有 LBP 或颈痛的患者。比较治疗师培训前后患者出院时疼痛和残疾结果测量的变化。还比较了治疗师在培训前后治疗患者时的临床实践模式,包括总治疗次数、护理持续时间、总计费单位、每次就诊的平均计费单位、“主动”计费单位的百分比和“主动和手动”计费单位的百分比。
无论患者的病情(LBP 或颈痛)如何,接受治疗师 CE 培训后治疗的患者在出院时的疼痛评分变化与接受治疗师 CE 培训前相比没有显著差异。然而,接受治疗师 CE 培训后治疗的 LBP 患者的残疾评分确实有所提高。在 CE 培训后,对于每个治疗阶段,治疗师倾向于使用更少的总就诊次数、每次就诊计费更少的单位,并且计费更多的“主动”和“主动和手动”计费单位。
参加在线 3 小时 PNE CE 课程可改善 LBP 患者的残疾评分,但对颈痛患者无效。治疗师临床行为的变化包括减少就诊次数、减少总计费单位,以及转向更积极和手动的治疗干预。进一步的前瞻性研究,包括对照组,应该调查治疗师 CE 对患者结果和临床实践的影响。