Suppr超能文献

系统综述和基于机制的肌肉骨骼系统疼痛分类系统的综合。

Systematic Review and Synthesis of Mechanism-based Classification Systems for Pain Experienced in the Musculoskeletal System.

机构信息

NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury & Health, School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Laval University, Québec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2020 Oct;36(10):793-812. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000860.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Improvements in pain management might be achieved by matching treatment to underlying mechanisms for pain persistence. Many authors argue for a mechanism-based classification of pain, but the field is challenged by the wide variation in the proposed terminology, definitions, and typical characteristics. This study aimed to (1) systematically review mechanism-based classifications of pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system; (2) synthesize and thematically analyze classifications, using the International Association for the Study of Pain categories of nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic as an initial foundation; and (3) identify convergence and divergence between categories, terminology, and descriptions of each mechanism-based pain classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases were searched for papers that discussed a mechanism-based classification of pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system. Terminology, definitions, underlying neurobiology/pathophysiology, aggravating/easing factors/response to treatment, and pain characteristics were extracted and synthesized on the basis of thematic analysis.

RESULTS

From 224 papers, 174 terms referred to pain mechanisms categories. Data synthesis agreed with the broad classification on the basis of ongoing nociceptive input, neuropathic mechanisms, and nociplastic mechanisms (eg, central sensitization). "Mixed," "other," and the disputed categories of "sympathetic" and "psychogenic" pain were also identified. Thematic analysis revealed convergence and divergence of opinion on the definitions, underlying neurobiology, and characteristics.

DISCUSSION

Some pain categories were defined consistently, and despite the extensive efforts to develop global consensus on pain definitions, disagreement still exists on how each could be defined, subdivided, and their characteristic features that could aid differentiation. These data form a foundation for reaching consensus on classification.

摘要

目的

通过针对疼痛持续存在的根本机制来匹配治疗,可能会改善疼痛管理。许多作者主张对疼痛进行基于机制的分类,但该领域受到所提出的术语、定义和典型特征差异广泛的挑战。本研究旨在:(1)系统回顾肌肉骨骼系统疼痛的基于机制的分类;(2)使用国际疼痛研究协会的伤害感受性、神经性和感觉型疼痛分类作为初步基础,对分类进行综合和主题分析;(3)确定每个基于机制的疼痛分类之间的类别、术语和描述的趋同和分歧。

材料和方法

检索数据库中讨论肌肉骨骼系统疼痛的基于机制分类的论文。基于主题分析,提取和综合术语、定义、潜在神经生物学/病理生理学、加重/缓解因素/治疗反应以及疼痛特征。

结果

从 224 篇论文中,有 174 个术语涉及疼痛机制类别。数据综合与持续伤害感受输入、神经病理性机制和感觉型疼痛机制(例如中枢敏化)的广泛分类一致。还确定了“混合”、“其他”以及有争议的“交感”和“心因性”疼痛类别。主题分析显示在定义、潜在神经生物学和特征方面存在意见的趋同和分歧。

讨论

一些疼痛类别被一致定义,尽管为疼痛定义制定全球共识做出了广泛努力,但对于如何定义每个类别、细分以及其有助于区分的特征,仍然存在分歧。这些数据为达成分类共识奠定了基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验