• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

句法距离和语序对语言处理的影响:基于英语心理语言学树库的研究

Effects of Syntactic Distance and Word Order on Language Processing: An Investigation Based on a Psycholinguistic Treebank of English.

机构信息

Institute of Quantitative Linguistics, Beijing Language and Culture University, No.15 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, CN-100083, China.

Department of Linguistics, Zhejiang University, No. 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, CN-310058, China.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Oct;51(5):1043-1062. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09878-4. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-022-09878-4
PMID:35484411
Abstract

We conducted a broad-coverage investigation of the effects of syntactic distance and word order on language processing against a dependency-annotated reading time corpus of English. A combined method of quantitative syntax and psycholinguistic analyses was adopted to yield converging evidence. It was found that (i) head-initial structures allow greater structural complexity, i.e., larger head-dependent distance, than head-final structures in both language comprehension and production; (ii) within the capacity limit of working memory, syntactic distance is a positive predictor of reading time for a word with a preceding head, whereas a negative predictor of reading time for a word with a following head; and (iii) at the sentence level, syntactic distance is a significant predictor of sentence reading time. These results suggest that (i) different word orders may enjoy different processing mechanisms in terms of cognitive difficulty and processes, which can be explained by an incremental language parser; and (ii) in addition to distance, word order should also be considered as a factor affecting language processing, which is an important extension to distance-based language processing models. Taken as a whole, our study paves the way for corpus-based integration of quantitative linguistic and psycholinguistic methods into understanding language processing and its underlying cognitive mechanisms.

摘要

我们对句法距离和词序对英语依存标注阅读时间语料库中语言处理的影响进行了广泛的研究。采用了定量句法和心理语言学分析相结合的方法,得出了相互印证的证据。结果发现:(i)在语言理解和产生中,头先行结构比头尾结构允许更大的结构复杂性,即更大的头依赖距离;(ii)在工作记忆的容量限制内,对于有前导词的词,句法距离是阅读时间的正预测因子,而对于有后续词的词,句法距离是阅读时间的负预测因子;(iii)在句子层面上,句法距离是句子阅读时间的显著预测因子。这些结果表明:(i)不同的词序可能在认知难度和过程方面具有不同的处理机制,可以用增量语言解析器来解释;(ii)除了距离之外,词序也应该被视为影响语言处理的因素之一,这是对基于距离的语言处理模型的重要扩展。总的来说,我们的研究为基于语料库的定量语言学和心理语言学方法的整合铺平了道路,有助于理解语言处理及其潜在的认知机制。

相似文献

1
Effects of Syntactic Distance and Word Order on Language Processing: An Investigation Based on a Psycholinguistic Treebank of English.句法距离和语序对语言处理的影响:基于英语心理语言学树库的研究
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Oct;51(5):1043-1062. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09878-4. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.语序类型学与语言复杂性相互作用:一项跨语言语料库研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12822.
3
The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.句子理解中的主题层次结构:一项关于西班牙语中动词类别与词序相互作用的研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(10):1981-2007. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1000345. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
4
A resource-rational model of human processing of recursive linguistic structure.递归语言结构的人类处理的资源理性模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 25;119(43):e2122602119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122602119. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
5
Interaction Between Syntactic Structure and Information Structure in the Processing of a Head-Final Language.在一种后置核心语言的处理中句法结构与信息结构之间的相互作用
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):247-260. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9433-3.
6
Investigating locality effects and surprisal in written English syntactic choice phenomena.探究书面英语句法选择现象中的局部性效应和意外性。
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:204-232. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
7
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.眼动追踪与功能磁共振成像相结合揭示句子理解过程中语言预测的神经基础。
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
8
Probabilistic modeling of discourse-aware sentence processing.话语感知句子处理的概率建模。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):425-51. doi: 10.1111/tops.12023. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
9
Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.阅读障碍中的句法歧义解决:对眼动差异和理解障碍背后认知因素的考察。
Dyslexia. 2019 May;25(2):115-141. doi: 10.1002/dys.1613. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Minimization of dependency length in written English.书面英语中依存长度的最小化。
Cognition. 2007 Nov;105(2):300-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.011.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimality of syntactic dependency distances.
Phys Rev E. 2022 Jan;105(1-1):014308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.014308.
2
Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.语序类型学与语言复杂性相互作用:一项跨语言语料库研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12822.
3
Language as a human-driven complex adaptive system: Comment on "Rethinking foundations of language from a multidisciplinary perspective" by T. Gong et al.作为人类驱动的复杂自适应系统的语言:评T. Gong等人的《从多学科视角重新思考语言基础》
Phys Life Rev. 2018 Nov;26-27:149-151. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages.依存距离:自然语言句法模式的新视角。
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:171-193. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
5
Effects of Surprisal and Locality on Danish Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.意外性和局部性对丹麦语句子处理的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Oct;46(5):1119-1136. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9482-2.
6
Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages.37种语言中依存长度最小化的大规模证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10336-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502134112. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
7
The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses.俄语关系从句的句法复杂性。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Nov 1;69(4):461-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.005.
8
Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity.语言输入的序列性质对句子复杂性的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2005 Mar 4;29(2):261-90. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7.
9
Do grammars minimize dependency length?语法是否能最小化依存长度?
Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;34(2):286-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01073.x. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
10
Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity.来自眼动追踪语料库的数据作为句法处理复杂性理论的证据。
Cognition. 2008 Nov;109(2):193-210. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Oct 18.