Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth St, PMCRT 3-904, M5G2C4, Toronto, Canada.
DMSI & CAST, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Apr 28;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01489-6.
Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) are conducted on a background of standard of care including metformin. These analyses sought to determine whether the cardiovascular (CV) effects of semaglutide and other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) vary according to baseline metformin use.
A post hoc analysis was conducted using pooled SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 CVOT data in subjects with and without metformin use at baseline. Additionally, a trial-level meta-analysis was conducted using data from seven CVOTs with GLP-1RAs-SUSTAIN 6, PIONEER 6, HARMONY OUTCOMES, LEADER, REWIND, EXSCEL and AMPLITUDE-O-including adults with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk, and a primary endpoint of time to first major adverse CV event (MACE).
In the post hoc analysis, the no-metformin subgroup was older, with a higher body mass index, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher CV risk at baseline vs the metformin subgroup. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the reduction in risk of MACE with semaglutide vs placebo in the metformin and no-metformin subgroups were 0.70 (0.55;0.89) and 0.86 (0.60;1.22), respectively. No significant interaction between the treatment effect on MACE and metformin subgroup was observed. Findings for other CV endpoints were similar. In the meta-analysis, treatment effect (GLP-1RA vs placebo) on CV outcomes was no different with vs without baseline metformin (overall ratio between the hazard ratios for metformin vs no-metformin 1.09 [0.96;1.22]).
These findings indicate that the CV outcomes for semaglutide were similar regardless of baseline metformin use, which may also apply to all GLP-1RAs. Trial registration SUSTAIN 6 (NCT01720446), PIONEER 6 (NCT02692716).
心血管结局试验 (CVOT) 是在包括二甲双胍在内的标准治疗背景下进行的。这些分析旨在确定司美格鲁肽和其他胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂 (GLP-1RA) 的心血管 (CV) 效应是否因基线时使用二甲双胍而不同。
使用基线时使用和不使用二甲双胍的 SUSTAIN 6 和 PIONEER 6 CVOT 数据进行事后分析。此外,还使用来自 7 项 GLP-1RA-SUSTAIN 6、PIONEER 6、HARMONY OUTCOMES、LEADER、REWIND、EXSCEL 和 AMPLITUDE-O 的 CVOT 数据进行了试验水平的荟萃分析,包括高心血管风险的 2 型糖尿病成年人,主要终点为首次主要不良心血管事件 (MACE) 的时间。
在事后分析中,无二甲双胍亚组年龄较大,基线时体重指数较高、估算肾小球滤过率较低且心血管风险较高。与安慰剂相比,司美格鲁肽降低 MACE 风险的风险比 (95%置信区间) 在二甲双胍和无二甲双胍亚组中分别为 0.70 (0.55;0.89) 和 0.86 (0.60;1.22)。未观察到治疗对 MACE 的影响与二甲双胍亚组之间存在显著交互作用。其他心血管终点的结果相似。在荟萃分析中,CV 结局的治疗效果(GLP-1RA 与安慰剂)在有无基线二甲双胍时没有差异(二甲双胍与无二甲双胍之间危险比的总体比值为 1.09 [0.96;1.22])。
这些发现表明,无论基线是否使用二甲双胍,司美格鲁肽的 CV 结局相似,这可能也适用于所有 GLP-1RA。试验注册 SUSTAIN 6(NCT01720446),PIONEER 6(NCT02692716)。