Andraos John, Smith Shawn R, Tran Amanda, Pham David Q
Western University of Health Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Pomona, CA USA.
HOAG, Mary & Dick Allen Diabetes Center, Newport Beach, CA USA.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024 Mar 25;23(1):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01406-6. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Metformin has been the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus as monotherapy or concomitantly with other glucose-lowering therapies due to its efficacy, safety, and affordability. Recent studies on the cardioprotective and renoprotective benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have influenced guidelines on diabetes management to consider these newer agents as alternative first-line therapies. This paper explores the literature supporting the use of these newer medications alone as a first-line agent in place of metformin.
A review of citations from the most recent guidelines along with a literature search via PubMed was completed to review (1) what, historically, made metformin first-line (2) if newer agents' benefits remain when used without metformin (3) how newer agents compare against metformin when used without it.
Evaluation of the historical literature was completed to summarize the key findings that support metformin as a first-line therapy agent. Additionally, an assessment of the literature reveals that the benefits of these two newer classes are independent of concomitant metformin therapy. Finally, studies have demonstrated that these newer agents can be either non-inferior or sometimes superior to metformin when used as monotherapy.
GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i can be considered as first line monotherapies for select patients with high cardiovascular risks, renal disease, or weight loss requirements. However, pharmacoeconomic considerations along with lesser long-term safety outcomes should limit these agents' use in certain patients as the management of diabetes continues to transition towards shared-decision making.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01406-6.
二甲双胍因其有效性、安全性和可负担性,一直是2型糖尿病单药治疗或与其他降糖疗法联合使用的一线治疗药物。最近关于胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)的心脏保护和肾脏保护益处的研究影响了糖尿病管理指南,将这些新型药物视为替代一线疗法。本文探讨了支持单独使用这些新型药物替代二甲双胍作为一线药物的文献。
对最新指南中的参考文献进行综述,并通过PubMed进行文献检索,以回顾(1)历史上使二甲双胍成为一线药物的因素;(2)在不使用二甲双胍的情况下使用新型药物时其益处是否仍然存在;(3)在不使用二甲双胍的情况下,新型药物与二甲双胍相比如何。
完成了对历史文献的评估,以总结支持二甲双胍作为一线治疗药物的关键发现。此外,对文献的评估表明,这两类新型药物的益处独立于二甲双胍联合治疗。最后,研究表明,这些新型药物作为单药治疗时,要么不劣于二甲双胍,有时甚至优于二甲双胍。
对于某些有高心血管风险、肾脏疾病或有减重需求的患者,GLP-1 RA和SGLT-2i可被视为一线单药治疗药物。然而,随着糖尿病管理继续向共同决策转变,药物经济学考虑以及较差的长期安全性结果应限制这些药物在某些患者中的使用。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40200-024-01406-6获取的补充材料。