Sacco Carlo, Olivi Silvia, Visani Jacopo, Donati Roberto, Veronesi Vanni, Mencarani Camilla, Capone Crescenzo, Bizzocchi Gianluca, Kiekens Carlotte, De Bonis Pasquale, Scerrati Alba, Staffa Guido
Peripheral Nerve Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi-Faenza, Faenza, Italy.
Spinal Unit, Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola, Italy.
Microsurgery. 2022 Sep;42(6):577-585. doi: 10.1002/micr.30891. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) resulting in tetraplegia is a leading cause of morbidity among young adults worldwide and its management remains challenging. Restoring hand function in these patients must be considered a top priority with great impact on their quality of life (QOL); although nerve and tendon transfer have been extensively described, type of procedure to be chosen is not standardized and few studies have determined the functional outcome of those procedure and their impact on QOL is still poorly assessed. We report a preliminary retrospective study regarding feasibility and functional outcomes of nerve transfer procedures including bilateral brachialis nerve on anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and supinator branch on posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) for hand reanimation following SCI focusing on the impact of these procedures on QOL.
We performed a retrospective study involving patient sustained SCI and underwent nerve transfer of brachialis branch from musculocutaneous nerve on AIN and supinator branch from the trunk of the radial nerve on the PIN. We included 11 patients (14 limbs) with traumatic SCI resulting in C4 level tetraplegia in five patients, C5 in four and C6 and C7 in one case each, with a median age of 31.5 years underwent surgery at a median of 10 months after injury; including both transfers in 10 cases and AIN reanimation only in one. Functional assessment including medical research council (MCR) grade, graded redefined assessment of strength sensation and prehension (GRASSP) and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) were performed at least 12 months follow up.
Thirteen PIN innervated muscles achieved an MRC score ≥3/5 whereas AIN supplied muscles in 5 out of 15. GRASSP qualitative measure improved from a baseline value of 1 to 2, while quantitative measure passed from 1 to 3 after 12 months; the difference was statistically significant (p = .005 and p = .008, respectively). SCIM self-care sub-score also statistically significant improved from 3 to 4 at 12 months (p = .016). No complication or donor morbidity occurred.
Functional performance has been significantly improved by nerve transfer procedures 1 year after surgery. Nerve transfers may represent a valuable option for the restoration of the hand function in patients with tetraplegia with minor or no morbidity.
创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)导致的四肢瘫痪是全球青壮年发病的主要原因,其治疗仍然具有挑战性。恢复这些患者的手部功能必须被视为重中之重,这对他们的生活质量(QOL)有重大影响;尽管神经和肌腱转移已被广泛描述,但选择的手术类型尚未标准化,很少有研究确定这些手术的功能结果,其对生活质量的影响仍评估不足。我们报告一项初步回顾性研究,内容是关于神经转移手术的可行性和功能结果,包括将双侧肱肌神经转移至骨间前神经(AIN)以及将旋后肌支转移至骨间后神经(PIN),用于SCI后手功能重建,重点关注这些手术对生活质量的影响。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了因SCI而接受手术的患者,这些患者接受了将肌皮神经的肱肌支转移至AIN以及将桡神经主干的旋后肌支转移至PIN的手术。我们纳入了11例患者(14条肢体),其中5例创伤性SCI导致C4级四肢瘫痪,4例为C5级,C6和C7级各1例,中位年龄31.5岁,受伤后中位10个月接受手术;10例患者进行了两种转移手术,1例仅进行了AIN重建。在至少12个月的随访中进行了功能评估,包括医学研究委员会(MCR)分级、力量感觉和抓握能力的分级重新定义评估(GRASSP)以及脊髓独立性测量(SCIM)。
13条由PIN支配的肌肉MRC评分≥3/5,而15条由AIN支配的肌肉中有5条达到该评分。GRASSP定性测量从基线值1改善到2,定量测量在12个月后从1提高到3;差异具有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.005和p = 0.008)。SCIM自理子评分在12个月时也从3显著提高到4(p = 0.016)。未发生并发症或供体发病情况。
术后1年,神经转移手术显著改善了功能表现。神经转移可能是恢复四肢瘫痪患者手部功能的一个有价值的选择,且发病率较低或无发病率。