Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤患者上肢功能重建的神经移植:一项为期2年的随访病例系列研究。

Nerve transfer for upper extremity reanimation in people with spinal cord injury: A 2-year follow-up case series.

作者信息

Olivi Silvia, Paglierani Paola, Maietti Elisa, Rucci Paola, Musumeci Gaia, Kiekens Carlotte, Visani Jacopo, Sacco Carlo

机构信息

Spinal Unit, Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola, Italy.

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 May;48(3):395-404. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2344313. Epub 2024 May 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the 2-year functional outcomes of nerve transfer (NT) for upper extremity reanimation.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective case series.

SETTING

A highly specialized rehabilitation hospital for spinal cord injury (SCI) in Italy.

INTERVENTION

Upper limb nerve transfer (32 NTs, 15 upper limbs).

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve male individuals with traumatic SCI (AIS A or B, neurological level from C4 to C7) were enrolled; 24-month follow-up data were available for 11.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We evaluated the strength recovery of recipient muscles through the Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength. Upper limb function and independence were assessed with the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) test version 1 and the Spinal Cord Independent Measure III (SCIM III). Patient satisfaction was also evaluated.

RESULTS

After 24 months, median MRC scores (range) were: triceps 2 (1-2); extensor digitorum communis 3 (1-4); extensor pollicis longus 2.5 (1-4); flexor digitorum profundus 2 (0-4); flexor pollicis longus 2 (0-4). No complication occurred. GRASSP prehension ability and prehension performance total scores significantly improved at 24 months from 1 (0-4) to 2 (0-7) and from 1 (0-8) to 5 (0--22), respectively. The SCIM III self-care sub-scale score improved at 24-month follow-up ( = 0.009).This study has important limitations, including a limited generalizability of the results and a small sample size that does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn. A large multicenter prospective study is needed to confirm our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

NT represents a functional surgery option with few complications for the resuscitation of upper limbs in persons with tetraplegia.

摘要

目的

描述上肢功能重建神经移植(NT)的2年功能结果。

研究设计

前瞻性病例系列研究。

地点

意大利一家高度专业化的脊髓损伤(SCI)康复医院。

干预措施

上肢神经移植(32例神经移植,15例上肢)。

参与者

招募了12名创伤性脊髓损伤男性患者(美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级A或B级,神经损伤平面为C4至C7);11名患者有24个月的随访数据。

观察指标

我们通过医学研究委员会肌力量表评估受区肌肉的力量恢复情况。采用第1版分级重新定义的力量、感觉和抓握能力评估(GRASSP)测试以及脊髓独立测量III(SCIM III)评估上肢功能及其独立性。同时评估患者满意度。

结果

24个月后的医学研究委员会评分中位数(范围)为:肱三头肌2(1 - 2);指总伸肌3(1 - 4);拇长伸肌2.5(1 - 4);指深屈肌2(0 - 4);拇长屈肌2(0 - 4)。未发生并发症。GRASSP抓握能力和抓握表现总分在24个月时显著改善,分别从1(0 - 4)提高到2(0 - 7)以及从1(0 - 8)提高到5(0 - 22)。SCIM III自我护理子量表评分在24个月随访时有所改善(P = 0.009)。本研究存在重要局限性,包括结果的普遍性有限以及样本量小,无法得出确定性结论。需要开展大型多中心前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现。

结论

神经移植是一种功能性手术选择,对于四肢瘫痪患者上肢功能重建并发症较少。

相似文献

1
Nerve transfer for upper extremity reanimation in people with spinal cord injury: A 2-year follow-up case series.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 May;48(3):395-404. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2344313. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: European Multicenter Responsiveness Study of the GRASSP.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):755-66. doi: 10.1177/1545968314565466. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
7
Predictive Value of Upper Limb Muscles and Grasp Patterns on Functional Outcome in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 May;30(4):295-306. doi: 10.1177/1545968315593806. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
8
The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension version 2 (GV2): Psychometric properties.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):149-157. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1616950.
9
Nerve transfer strategies for spinal cord injury.
World Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;80(6):e319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
10
Outcome of the upper limb in cervical spinal cord injury: Profiles of recovery and insights for clinical studies.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Sep;37(5):503-10. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000252.

本文引用的文献

1
Nerve Transfer After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Who Has a "Time Sensitive" Injury Based on Electrodiagnostic Findings?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr;105(4):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
2
Upper Limb Nerve Transfer Surgery in Patients With Tetraplegia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243890. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43890.
7
Evaluation for Late Nerve Transfer Surgery in Spinal Cord Injury: Predicting the Degree of Lower Motor Neuron Injury.
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Feb;45(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
8
Nerve transfers in the upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury. Part 2: Preliminary results of a prospective clinical trial.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jul 12;31(5):641-653. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19399. Print 2019 Nov 1.
9
Nerve transfers in the upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury. Part 1: Systematic review of the literature.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jul 12;31(5):629-640. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19173. Print 2019 Nov 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验