Suppr超能文献

与初级保健医生门诊治疗相比,药剂师管理的静脉血栓栓塞症诊所的药物经济学、药物可及性及患者满意度分析

Pharmacoeconomic, Medication Access, and Patient-Satisfaction Analysis of a Pharmacist-Managed VTE Clinic Compared to Primary Care Physician Outpatient Therapy.

作者信息

Howell Chandler Wayne, Walroth Todd A, Beam Daren M, Geik Christopher A, Howell Molly M, Macik Monica R, Schmelz Andrew N, DiRenzo Baely M

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2022 Apr;35(2):212-217. doi: 10.1177/0897190020966210. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common medical condition often treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Current literature supports outpatient treatment of select, low-risk VTE patients by a pharmacist with DOACs; however, no studies exist to demonstrate if a pharmacist-managed VTE clinic provides financial benefit compared to physician-managed outpatient care. To compare the financial implications and patient satisfaction of pharmacist-managed VTE care versus outpatient VTE care by a primary care physician. A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients seen at a pharmacist-managed VTE clinic for safety and reimbursement outcomes between August 1, 2018 and July 31, 2019. These data points were used to assess the primary endpoint of net gain per patient visit and secondary outcomes, including patient satisfaction score. The primary outcome median (IQR) for net gain per visit was $16.57 (16.57, 16.57) for the pharmacist-managed group and $64.37 (47.04, 64.37) in the physician-managed group with a 95% CI of 39.13-47.80. The median cost to the organization per visit was $4.96 (4.96, 4.96) for the pharmacist-managed group and $39.41 (23.65, 39.41) for the physician managed group with a 95% CI of 26.57-34.45. Statistical difference was also found for a secondary outcome of percentage of days covered for the pharmacist-managed group compared to the physician managed group, median (IQR) 100% (76,100) vs 92.2% (67.2, 98.9) respectfully, with a p-value of 0.043. The pharmacist-managed VTE clinic, although financially sustainable, provides significantly less net revenue per patient than physician managed clinics, demonstrating the need for increased payer recognition for pharmacists.

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是一种常见的病症,通常采用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)进行治疗。当前的文献支持由药剂师对部分低风险VTE患者进行门诊治疗;然而,尚无研究表明与医生管理的门诊护理相比,药剂师管理的VTE诊所是否具有经济效益。为比较药剂师管理的VTE护理与初级保健医生的门诊VTE护理在经济影响和患者满意度方面的差异。对2018年8月1日至2019年7月31日期间在药剂师管理的VTE诊所就诊的所有患者进行了单中心回顾性病历审查,以评估安全性和报销结果。这些数据点用于评估每次患者就诊净收益的主要终点以及次要结果,包括患者满意度得分。药剂师管理组每次就诊净收益的主要结果中位数(IQR)为16.57美元(16.57, 16.57),医生管理组为64.37美元(47.04, 64.37),95%置信区间为39.13 - 47.80。药剂师管理组每次就诊组织的中位数成本为4.96美元(4.96, 4.96),医生管理组为39.41美元(23.65, 39.41),95%置信区间为26.57 - 34.45。与医生管理组相比,药剂师管理组的次要结果覆盖天数百分比也存在统计学差异,中位数(IQR)分别为100%(76,100)和92.2%(67.2, 98.9),p值为0.043。药剂师管理的VTE诊所虽然在经济上具有可持续性,但每位患者的净收入明显低于医生管理的诊所,这表明需要付款方更多地认可药剂师。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验