Department of General Surgery, Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.
Department of Gastroenterology, Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Apr;28(4):471-476. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.49956.
Acute cholecystitis is a severe disease that requires urgent operation in some cases. To select suitable patients for a conservative approach, there is a need for an affordable and reliable marker for determining complication risk. Evaluation of systemic inflammatory markers in combination with other parameters such as white blood cell and the C-reactive protein might help to decide the appropriate treatment option. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and thrombocyte-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in determining the risk of complicated acute cholecystitis and to compare with intraoperative and pathological findings.
A total of 229 patients operated on for acute cholecystitis were included in this study. Intraoperative and pathologically complicated acute cholecystitis in 78 cases and controls group was 151 cases. The two groups were compared in terms of inflammation markers. Then, we used the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the optimal value for NLR and PLR concerning the severity of cholecystitis. Then, the differences in clinical symptoms were investigated according to the cutoff value for NLR and PLR.
The NLR and PLR levels were found to be significantly higher in the complicated group (4.18±4.53 vs. 15.23±20.99, 145.34±87.58, and 251.92±245.93, respectively, p<0.01). The best cutoff value for NLR and PLR was 5.5 and 146.90, respectively. Sensitivity for NLR was 80% and specificity was 80.1%. Sensitivity for PLR was 66.7% and specificity was 66.2%.
Systemic inflammation markers can be used to predict the risk of complicated acute cholecystitis. They are inex-pensive tools that can be used to make surgical decisions, especially in resource scarce environments.
急性胆囊炎在某些情况下是一种需要紧急手术的严重疾病。为了选择适合保守治疗的患者,需要一种负担得起且可靠的标志物来确定并发症风险。评估全身炎症标志物并结合白细胞和 C 反应蛋白等其他参数可能有助于决定适当的治疗选择。本研究旨在评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在确定复杂急性胆囊炎风险中的诊断价值,并与术中及病理发现进行比较。
本研究共纳入 229 例因急性胆囊炎接受手术的患者。78 例为术中及病理证实的复杂急性胆囊炎患者,对照组为 151 例。比较两组炎症标志物。然后,我们使用受试者工作特征曲线分析来确定 NLR 和 PLR 对胆囊炎严重程度的最佳值。然后,根据 NLR 和 PLR 的临界值,研究了临床症状的差异。
复杂组 NLR 和 PLR 水平明显高于对照组(4.18±4.53 比 15.23±20.99、145.34±87.58 比 251.92±245.93,p<0.01)。NLR 和 PLR 的最佳临界值分别为 5.5 和 146.90。NLR 的灵敏度为 80%,特异性为 80.1%。PLR 的灵敏度为 66.7%,特异性为 66.2%。
全身炎症标志物可用于预测复杂急性胆囊炎的风险。它们是一种廉价的工具,可以用于做出手术决策,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。