López-López José A, Rubio-Aparicio María, Sánchez-Meca Julio
Universidad de Murcia.
Psicothema. 2022 May;34(2):175-181. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2021.586.
In the last years, overviews of systematic reviews, or umbrella reviews, have seen a dramatic increase in their use. An overview aims to provide a summary of the included reviews and will often examine research questions beyond those addressed in the systematic reviews being synthesised. The purpose of this article is to provide some recommendations on how overviews should be conducted and reported.
A literature review was performed to identify relevant papers on both methodological and applied overviews.
The current literature recommends carrying out overviews by following similar steps to those of systematic reviews: (a) Defining the overview research question; (b) inclusion and exclusion criteria; (c) literature search; (d) data extraction; (e) assessment of risk of bias and reporting quality; (f) overview results; and (g) reporting the overview. Of special interest is how to address dependencies between the systematic reviews.
Overviews allow evidence to be efficiently combined from multiple systematic reviews. This offers the possibility of translating and summarizing large amounts of information. As in primary studies and systematic reviews, conducting and reporting of overviews must meet appropriate quality standards.
在过去几年中,系统评价的概述,即汇总分析,其应用显著增加。概述旨在提供所纳入评价的总结,并且通常会探讨超出所综合的系统评价所涉及的研究问题。本文的目的是就如何进行和报告概述提供一些建议。
进行文献综述以识别关于方法学和应用概述的相关论文。
当前文献建议按照与系统评价类似的步骤进行概述:(a)定义概述研究问题;(b)纳入和排除标准;(c)文献检索;(d)数据提取;(e)偏倚风险和报告质量评估;(f)概述结果;以及(g)报告概述。特别值得关注的是如何处理系统评价之间的相关性。
概述使来自多个系统评价的证据能够有效整合。这提供了翻译和总结大量信息的可能性。与原始研究和系统评价一样,概述的进行和报告必须符合适当的质量标准。