Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acıbadem Fulya Hospital Sports Medicine Center, İstanbul-Turkey.
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Bezmialem Vakıf University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Turkey.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Mar;28(3):320-327. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.39998.
Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL graft failure and is considered an indication for anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare functional outcomes, rupture rates, and residual instability in patients with GJH undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction or combined ACL reconstruction and ALL augmentation with internal bracing (ALL-IB).
Sixty-eight patients with GJH and unilateral ACL injury were randomly assigned to undergo either isolated ACL reconstruction (Group 1) or combined ACL reconstruction and ALL-IB (Group 2). The patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively; their medical histories; physical examination results; anterior knee translation, as measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer; and scores of validated knee assessments were recorded.
Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 37 and 31 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up was 30.1±4.1 and 28.1±2.9 months, respectively. In the final evaluation, the patients in Group 2 showed better rotational stability, as evaluated by the pivot-shift test (p=0.013); better anteroposterior stability, as evaluated by KT-1000 arthrometry (p=0.001); similar function (p=0.14 for the Lysholm, p=0.11 for the Cincinnati, and p=0.19 for the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score); and failure rate (p=0.41).
The functional outcomes were similar between the groups. The stability outcomes after combined ACL and ALL-IB were better than those after isolated ACL reconstruction in patients with GJH. However, the technique and its results need to be validated in larger patient series and prospective randomized controlled trials.
全身性关节过度活动症(GJH)是前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和 ACL 移植物失败的危险因素,被认为是前外侧韧带(ALL)重建的指征。本回顾性研究的目的是比较患有全身性关节过度活动症(GJH)的患者行单纯 ACL 重建或联合 ACL 重建和带内支撑物的 ALL 增强(ALL-IB)的功能结果、再断裂率和残留不稳定情况。
68 例单侧 ACL 损伤伴 GJH 的患者被随机分为单纯 ACL 重建组(1 组)或联合 ACL 重建和 ALL-IB 组(2 组)。对患者进行术前和术后评估;记录他们的病史;体格检查结果;使用 KT-1000 关节测量仪测量的膝关节前向平移;以及经过验证的膝关节评估的评分。
1 组和 2 组分别包括 37 例和 31 例患者。平均随访时间分别为 30.1±4.1 个月和 28.1±2.9 个月。在最终评估中,2 组患者的旋转稳定性(根据枢轴移位试验评估,p=0.013)更好;膝关节前向稳定性(根据 KT-1000 关节测量仪评估,p=0.001)更好;功能相似(Lysholm 评分 p=0.14,Cincinnati 评分 p=0.11,国际膝关节文献委员会主观评分 p=0.19);以及再断裂率(p=0.41)相似。
两组的功能结果相似。在 GJH 患者中,与单纯 ACL 重建相比,联合 ACL 和 ALL-IB 的稳定性结果更好。然而,该技术及其结果需要在更大的患者系列和前瞻性随机对照试验中进行验证。