• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过“反馈教学法”提高伊朗健康大使的健康素养:一项随机对照试验。

Promoting health literacy through the teach back method among Iranian health ambassadors: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Sotoudeh Ahmad, Ardakani Mojtaba Fattahi, Jadgal Mohammad Saeed, Asadian Ali, Zareipour Morad Ali

机构信息

Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran,

Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Iran,

出版信息

Invest Educ Enferm. 2022 Mar;40(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v40n1e17.

DOI:10.17533/udea.iee.v40n1e17
PMID:35485630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9052725/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Describe the effect the teach back method on promoting the health literacy of health ambassadors in Urmia County in 2020.

METHODS

In the present quasi-experiment, 200 persons over 14 years old participated. They were divided into two research groups, a control (n=100) and an intervention (n=100). The sampling method was simple randomization and the data collection instrument was a questionnaire comprised of demographic information and health literacy (HELIA). The educational intervention took 4 sessions each 45 minutes in length following the teach back method. The questionnaire-based data were collected once before the intervention and once again three months after the intervention.

RESULTS

The present findings showed that 54% of the control group and 50% of the intervention group had a good or very good level of health literacy before the intervention(p>0.05). However, after the intervention, 52% of the control and 78% of the intervention group had a good or very good level of health literacy. The present findings revealed that the mean scores of health literacy dimensions (access to information, reading, understanding, appraisal, decision-making) and the overall health literacy score were significantly higher in the intervention group than the control (after the intervention). Wilcoxon's test results showed that the mean difference of the overall health literacy scores and the dimensions before and after the intervention were statistically significant (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of the present findings, we can conclude that participatory methods and the teach back method can improve health literacy, acquire reliable information and adopt healthy behaviors.

摘要

目的

描述2020年回授法对提高乌尔米耶县健康大使健康素养的效果。

方法

在本次准实验中,200名14岁以上的人参与其中。他们被分为两个研究组,即对照组(n = 100)和干预组(n = 100)。抽样方法为简单随机抽样,数据收集工具是一份由人口统计学信息和健康素养(HELIA)组成的问卷。教育干预采用回授法,共进行4次,每次时长45分钟。基于问卷的数据在干预前收集一次,干预后三个月再收集一次。

结果

目前的研究结果表明,干预前对照组54%的人和干预组50%的人具有良好或非常良好的健康素养水平(p>0.05)。然而,干预后,对照组52%的人和干预组78%的人具有良好或非常良好的健康素养水平。目前的研究结果显示,干预组健康素养维度(信息获取、阅读、理解、评估、决策)的平均得分和整体健康素养得分显著高于对照组(干预后)。威尔科克森检验结果表明,干预前后整体健康素养得分及各维度的平均差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。

结论

根据目前的研究结果,我们可以得出结论,参与式方法和回授法可以提高健康素养,获取可靠信息并采取健康行为。

相似文献

1
Promoting health literacy through the teach back method among Iranian health ambassadors: A randomized controlled trial.通过“反馈教学法”提高伊朗健康大使的健康素养:一项随机对照试验。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2022 Mar;40(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v40n1e17.
2
Investigating the effect of teach-back method on improving the lifestyle of health ambassadors in Urmia.调查反馈教学法对改善乌尔米耶健康大使生活方式的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Oct 31;11:328. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1569_21. eCollection 2022.
3
Investigating the effect of education on health literacy and its relation to health-promoting behaviors in health center.调查健康教育对健康素养的影响及其与健康中心促进健康行为的关系。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Oct 29;7:127. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_65_18. eCollection 2018.
4
Effectiveness of the teach-back method for improving the health literacy of senior citizens in nursing homes.反馈教学法对提高养老院老年人健康素养的有效性。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2018 Jul;15(3):195-202. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12192. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
5
Promoting the adoption of behaviors to prevent osteoporosis using the health belief model integrated with health literacy: quasi-experimental intervention study.采用健康信念模式结合健康素养促进预防骨质疏松行为的采纳:准实验干预研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;21(1):2221. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12300-8.
6
The Effect of an Educational Intervention on Health Literacy and the Adoption of Nutritional Preventive Behaviors Related to Osteoporosis Among Iranian Health Volunteers.教育干预对伊朗卫生志愿者健康素养和采纳骨质疏松症营养预防行为的影响。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2021 Nov;54(6):404-411. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.21.183. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using the Teach-Back Method to Improve the Health Literacy of Individuals in the Community.评估运用反馈教学法提高社区居民健康素养的效果。
J Community Health Nurs. 2025 Jan-Mar;42(1):11-18. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2024.2399347. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
8
A problem-based learning health literacy intervention program on improving health-promoting behaviors among girl students.一项基于问题学习的健康素养干预项目,旨在改善女学生的健康促进行为。
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Dec 31;8:251. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_476_19. eCollection 2019.
9
Health-Literacy Training for First-Year Respiratory Therapy Students: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.对呼吸治疗专业一年级学生进行健康素养培训:一项混合方法的试点研究。
Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):68-74. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06896. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
A theory of planned behavior-enhanced intervention to promote health literacy and self-care behaviors of type 2 diabetic patients.计划行为理论增强干预促进 2 型糖尿病患者健康素养和自我保健行为。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Jan 14;61(4):E601-E613. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.4.1504. eCollection 2020 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Insulin Pen Training Using the Teach-Back Method on Diabetes Self-Management, Quality of Life, and HbA1c Levels in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.采用反馈教学法进行胰岛素笔培训对老年2型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理、生活质量及糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项准实验研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;12(18):1854. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12181854.

本文引用的文献

1
Use and Effectiveness of the Teach-Back Method in Patient Education and Health Outcomes.反馈教学法在患者教育及健康结局中的应用与效果
Fed Pract. 2019 Jun;36(6):284-289.
2
An education intervention to improve decision making and health literacy among older Australians: a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高澳大利亚老年人决策能力和健康素养的教育干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 7;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1143-x.
3
Health Literacy and Use and Trust in Health Information.健康素养与健康信息的使用和信任
J Health Commun. 2018;23(8):724-734. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1511658. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
4
Using the Teach-Back Method in Patient Education to Improve Patient Satisfaction.在患者教育中运用反馈教学法以提高患者满意度。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2017 Jan 1;48(1):47-52. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20170110-10.
5
Usefulness of a Tailored eHealth Service for Informal Caregivers and Professionals in the Dementia Treatment and Care Setting: The eHealthMonitor Dementia Portal.针对痴呆症治疗与护理环境中的非正式照料者和专业人员的定制化电子健康服务的效用:电子健康监测痴呆症门户网站
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Apr 5;5(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4354.
6
Development of a culturally appropriate computer-delivered tailored Internet-based health literacy intervention for Spanish-dominant Hispanics living with HIV.为以西班牙语为主的感染艾滋病毒的西班牙裔人群开发一种符合文化背景的、通过计算机提供的、量身定制的基于互联网的健康素养干预措施。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Nov 30;14:103. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0103-9.
7
Impact of health literacy on outcomes and effectiveness of an educational intervention in patients with chronic diseases.健康素养对慢性病患者教育干预效果和结局的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.020. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
8
Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis.关键健康素养:综述与批判性分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 12.
9
The evolving concept of health literacy.健康素养的不断演变的概念。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050. Epub 2008 Oct 25.