Orthopedics. 2022 Sep-Oct;45(5):e269-e275. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20220425-05. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Intraoperative medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious complication. External bracing and/or conversion to a constrained implant has previously been studied. The technique of using an internal high-strength suture brace to augment an MCL repair has been evaluated in the nonarthroplasty patient and could provide an alternate solution. The goal of this study was to determine whether MCL repair with internal suture bracing restores stability of the implanted knee joint. A robotic simulator completed laxity testing on 5 cadaveric knee specimens in 4 sequential phases: (1) intact knee, (2) after implantation with TKA, (3) after sectioning of the MCL, and (4) after MCL repair with suture brace augmentation. Laxity was compared between the different test phases throughout range of motion. Subsequently, the internal brace was tested to failure under valgus load. The MCL repair with internal bracing was effective at restoring laxity in varus-valgus, internal-external, and medial-lateral degrees of freedom through midflexion, with limited support at deeper flexion angles and in anterior-posterior laxity. Rotational laxity was not significantly different than intact knee laxity. Generally, medial-lateral translations were less and anterior-posterior translations were greater and were significantly different at 30° to 45° and 90°, respectively. The mean failure moment was 46.4±9.1 Nm, with the primary mode of failure being MCL repair. Primary MCL repair with internal bracing using a high-strength suture augment showed the potential to provide adequate stability and strength to correct MCL incompetence in TKA without the use of an external knee brace or constrained implants. [. 2022;45(5):e269-e275.].
全膝关节置换术中内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤是一种严重的并发症。既往研究过外部支具和/或转换为约束型植入物。在非关节置换患者中,使用内部高强度缝线支撑物来增强 MCL 修复的技术已得到评估,这可能是一种替代解决方案。本研究旨在确定使用内部缝线支撑物修复 MCL 是否能恢复植入膝关节的稳定性。机器人模拟器在 4 个连续阶段对 5 个尸体膝关节标本进行了松弛度测试:(1)完整膝关节,(2)TKA 植入后,(3)MCL 切断后,(4)MCL 修复后使用缝线支撑物增强。在整个运动范围内比较不同测试阶段的松弛度。随后,在外翻负荷下对内支撑进行了失效测试。在 MCL 修复中使用内部支撑物在矢状面、内外侧和内外侧自由度上的松弛度得到有效恢复,在中屈度时具有有限的支撑,在更深的屈度角度和前-后松弛度时支撑力有限。旋转松弛度与完整膝关节松弛度无显著差异。通常,内侧-外侧平移较小,前-后平移较大,分别在 30°至 45°和 90°时差异显著。平均失效力矩为 46.4±9.1 Nm,主要失效模式为 MCL 修复。使用高强度缝线增强的内部支撑物进行的原发性 MCL 修复有可能在不使用外部膝关节支具或约束型植入物的情况下,为 TKA 中的 MCL 功能不全提供足够的稳定性和强度。[2022;45(5):e269-e275.]。