Suppr超能文献

与FIB-4相比,使用肝脏硬度测量法对2型糖尿病患者进行的转诊减少且更合适。

Reduced and more appropriate referrals of patients with type 2 diabetes using liver stiffness measurement compared to FIB-4.

作者信息

Shanahan William, Bagwe Isha, Brassill Mary Jane, O'Regan Paud

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Tipperary University Hospital, Clonmel, Co Tipperary, Ireland.

Department of Endocrinology, Tipperary University Hospital, Clonmel, Co Tipperary, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Apr;192(2):649-654. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03019-5. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fatty liver disease and fibrosis are common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently published European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines have suggested screening such patients using liver stiffness measurement (LSM) or fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) to exclude advanced fibrosis.

AIMS

We initiated a screening programme at the diabetes out-patient clinic to assess the reliability of the suggested approaches and resulting referrals.

METHODS

In this prospective study, consecutive patients attending for T2DM review at an Irish level 3 (district general) hospital between September and November 2021 were screened for liver fibrosis using LSM and had their FIB-4 calculated. The first 100 patients with valid LSM measurements were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Referral rates to the hepatology clinic varied by modality used. If FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 criterion was used, the referral rate to the hepatology clinic was 45%; using LSM < 8 kPa to rule out advanced fibrosis resulted in 34% referral rate; using LSM ≥ 10 kPa to suggest probable compensated advanced chronic liver disease reduced referral rates to 15%. Combining FIB-4 with LSM in a two-step algorithm led to missed potentially significant liver disease in large numbers. 47% patients with LSM ≥ 8 kPa and 33% with LSM ≥ 10 kPa had FIB-4 < 1.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening of patients with T2DM using LSM alone rather than FIB-4 leads to reduced numbers of, and more appropriate, referrals to the hepatology clinic. Shifting from an exclusion (LSM < 8 kPa) to an inclusion based (LSM ≥ 10 kPa) approach may lessen the potential of screening to overwhelm hepatology services.

摘要

背景

脂肪肝疾病和肝纤维化在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中很常见。最近发布的欧洲肝脏研究协会指南建议对这类患者进行肝硬度测量(LSM)或纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)筛查,以排除晚期纤维化。

目的

我们在糖尿病门诊启动了一项筛查计划,以评估所建议方法及后续转诊的可靠性。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,于2021年9月至11月期间在爱尔兰一家三级(地区综合)医院就诊进行T2DM复查的连续患者,使用LSM进行肝纤维化筛查并计算其FIB-4。分析纳入了前100例有有效LSM测量值的患者。

结果

转诊至肝病门诊的比例因使用的筛查方式而异。若采用FIB-4≥1.3的标准,转诊至肝病门诊的比例为45%;使用LSM<8 kPa来排除晚期纤维化,转诊率为34%;使用LSM≥10 kPa提示可能为代偿性晚期慢性肝病,转诊率降至15%。在两步算法中结合使用FIB-4和LSM会导致大量潜在的严重肝病被漏诊。47%的LSM≥8 kPa患者和33%的LSM≥10 kPa患者FIB-4<1.3。

结论

仅使用LSM而非FIB-4对T2DM患者进行筛查,可减少转诊至肝病门诊的人数,并使转诊更合理。从排除性(LSM<8 kPa)方法转变为纳入性(LSM≥10 kPa)方法,可能会降低筛查给肝病服务带来的压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验