MAPEI Sport Research Centre.
Bangor University.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2023 Sep;94(3):760-772. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2022.2053646. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Understanding the dose-response relationship between internal and external training load with changes in aerobic fitness and intermittent running capacity, during different periods of the season, may help in optimizing training process. The aim of the present study was to investigate the dose-response relationships between load measures and changes in aerobic fitness and intermittent running capacity among a large cohort of professional soccer players. Training load, aerobic fitness and intermittent running capacity of 52 male adult professional players from 3 elite teams were monitored across an entire season and analyzed employing linear mixed models, with a significance level set at p≤0.05. Relationships between load measures (training and match duration, sRPE-TL, total distance, high and very high-speed running distances) and changes in physical qualities were stronger during the preparation period (PREP) for both aerobic fitness (d= 0.48 to 0.76, p<0.031) and intermittent running capacity (d= 0.46 to 1.89, p<0.046). The magnitude of the relationships reduced during the first competitive period (d= 0.43 to 0.56) and the relationships became trivial in the second competitive period (d= 0.06 to 0.41, p= 0.063 to 0.846). The moderate to large relationships found between all measures of load and changes in physical capacities suggest that training prescription during the PREP was effective in improving players' fitness. During the competitive phase small changes in aerobic and intermittent running capacities were found, highlighting that coaching staff pursue different aims during the competitive period, such as technical and tactical training and recovery. .
了解内部和外部训练负荷与有氧健身和间歇性跑步能力变化之间的剂量-反应关系,可能有助于优化训练过程。本研究的目的是调查负荷测量与有氧健身和间歇性跑步能力变化之间的剂量-反应关系,研究对象为来自 3 支精英球队的 52 名成年男性职业足球运动员。对 52 名男性成年职业足球运动员在整个赛季的训练负荷、有氧健身和间歇性跑步能力进行监测,采用线性混合模型进行分析,显著性水平设为 p≤0.05。在有氧健身(d=0.48 至 0.76,p<0.031)和间歇性跑步能力(d=0.46 至 1.89,p<0.046)方面,负荷测量(训练和比赛时间、sRPE-TL、总距离、高速和超高距离)与身体素质变化之间的关系在准备期(PREP)更为密切。在第一个比赛期(d=0.43 至 0.56),这种关系的强度降低,在第二个比赛期(d=0.06 至 0.41),这种关系变得微不足道(p=0.063 至 0.846)。在所有负荷测量与身体能力变化之间发现的中度至较大关系表明,在 PREP 期间的训练方案在提高运动员的体能方面是有效的。在竞争阶段,发现有氧和间歇性跑步能力的变化较小,这突出表明教练组在竞争阶段追求不同的目标,例如技术和战术训练和恢复。