*Petros Mourouzis, MSc, PhD, assitant professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Dental Tissues Pathology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ellisavet-Ioanna Diamantopoulou, MSc, graduate student, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Oper Dent. 2021 Sep 1;46(5):E171-E184. doi: 10.2341/20-158-L.
The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-assisted tooth bleaching treatment on the elution of monomers and surface roughness of a hybrid computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) material, and to compare it with a resin composite for direct restorations.
Forty specimens of a hybrid CAD-CAM material (Enamic) and forty of a conventional resin composite (Tetric) were fabricated and randomly divided into four groups (n=10). Half of the specimens of each material were stored in distilled water and the other half in artificial saliva for 7 days. At the end of this period, the storage medium was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the surface roughness parameters of the specimens were evaluated by optical imaging noncontact interferometric profilometry. Afterwards, half of the specimens of each tested material received a conventional in-office tooth bleaching treatment and the other half an Er,Cr:YSGG laser-assisted bleaching treatment, and then they were again incubated in distilled water and artificial saliva for an additional 7-day time period. At the end of this period, the effect of the bleaching treatments on elution of monomers and surface roughness of the tested materials was evaluated.
Bisphenol A (BPA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), and bisphenol A-glycidyl dimethacrylate (BisGMA) were eluted from the conventional resin composite into both the solutions tested. Only TEGDMA was eluted from the hybrid CAD-CAM material. However, no statistically significant differences were found among the surface roughness parameters of both materials. Both the conventional and Er,Cr:YSGG laser-assisted tooth bleaching treatments affected the monomer elution from the composite resin. However, there were no statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the treatments.
According to the results of this study, tooth bleaching with Er,Cr:YSGG laser or conventional technique is safe, even if the bleaching agent comes in contact with hybrid CAD-CAM restorations.
本体外研究旨在探讨 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光辅助牙齿漂白治疗对混合计算机辅助设计-计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)材料单体洗脱和表面粗糙度的影响,并将其与直接修复用树脂复合材料进行比较。
制备 40 个混合 CAD-CAM 材料(Enamic)和 40 个常规树脂复合材料(Tetric)试件,并将其随机分为四组(n=10)。每组材料的一半试件保存在蒸馏水中,另一半保存在人工唾液中 7 天。在此期间结束时,通过高效液相色谱法(HPLC)分析储存介质,并通过光学成像非接触式干涉轮廓测量法评估试件的表面粗糙度参数。之后,对每个测试材料的一半试件进行常规诊室牙齿漂白治疗,另一半进行 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光辅助漂白治疗,然后再次将其在蒸馏水中和人工唾液中孵育 7 天。在此期间结束时,评估漂白处理对测试材料单体洗脱和表面粗糙度的影响。
双酚 A(BPA)、尿烷二甲基丙烯酸酯(UDMA)、三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEGDMA)和双酚 A 缩水甘油二甲基丙烯酸酯(BisGMA)从常规树脂复合材料中洗脱到两种测试溶液中。仅 TEGDMA 从混合 CAD-CAM 材料中洗脱。然而,两种材料的表面粗糙度参数之间没有发现统计学上的显著差异。常规和 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光辅助牙齿漂白治疗均影响复合树脂的单体洗脱。然而,两种处理之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p<0.05)。
根据这项研究的结果,即使漂白剂与混合 CAD-CAM 修复体接触,使用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光或常规技术进行牙齿漂白也是安全的。