Departments of Neurology.
Psychiatry, Behavioral Neurology Section, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2022 Jun 1;35(2):147-152. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000302.
White matter in the human brain occupies roughly the same volume as gray matter but has received far less attention in behavioral neurology and related disciplines. In particular, the cerebral cortex has long dominated thinking about the organization of brain-behavior relationships. As a result, subcortical structures, including deep gray matter and, most notably, white matter, have been accorded relatively little neuroscientific study compared with the extensive work devoted to the cerebral cortex. The influence of corticocentrism can be explained by several factors, including historical precedent in neurology strongly emphasizing the importance of the cortex, a preponderance of investigative methods that selectively target this structure, and a misinterpretation of comparative neuroanatomic data gathered from normal brains. This paper will describe the background of the corticocentric bias and emphasize that white matter merits its own place within the study of the higher functions. Although corticocentrism continues to exert a powerful impact on behavioral neurology, considerable progress is being made in the study of white matter-a development that promises to expand our knowledge of the normal brain and lead to an improved understanding of how it mediates behavior. In turn, a range of vexing neurologic and psychiatric disorders may become better illuminated by considering pathology within, or dysfunction of, white matter tracts. A complete appreciation of brain-behavior relationships requires an understanding not only of the outermost layer of the cerebral hemispheres, but also of white matter connectivity that links gray matter regions into distributed neural networks that subserve cognition and emotion.
人脑的白质占据了大致与灰质相同的体积,但在行为神经科学和相关学科中却受到了远远较少的关注。特别是,大脑皮层长期以来一直主导着对大脑-行为关系的组织的思考。因此,与广泛致力于大脑皮层的研究相比,皮质中心主义(subcortical structures,包括深部灰质,尤其是白质)相对较少受到神经科学研究的关注。皮质中心主义的影响可以用几个因素来解释,包括神经科学中强烈强调皮层重要性的历史先例、选择性针对该结构的调查方法占主导地位,以及对从正常大脑中收集的比较神经解剖数据的错误解释。本文将描述皮质中心主义偏见的背景,并强调白质在高级功能研究中应占有一席之地。尽管皮质中心主义继续对行为神经科学产生强大影响,但在白质研究方面正在取得相当大的进展——这一发展有望扩大我们对正常大脑的认识,并导致对其如何介导行为的理解的提高。反过来,通过考虑白质束内的病理学或功能障碍,一系列令人烦恼的神经和精神障碍可能会得到更好的阐明。对大脑-行为关系的全面理解不仅需要了解大脑半球的最外层,还需要了解将灰质区域连接到认知和情感服务的分布式神经网络的白质连接。