• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决零毁林商品供应链中的间接采购问题。

Addressing indirect sourcing in zero deforestation commodity supply chains.

作者信息

Zu Ermgassen Erasmus K H J, Bastos Lima Mairon G, Bellfield Helen, Dontenville Adeline, Gardner Toby, Godar Javier, Heilmayr Robert, Indenbaum Rosa, Dos Reis Tiago N P, Ribeiro Vivian, Abu Itohan-Osa, Szantoi Zoltan, Meyfroidt Patrick

机构信息

Georges Lemaître Earth and Climate Research Centre, Earth and Life Institute, UCLouvain, Bâtiment Mercator, Place Louis Pasteur 3, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique F. R. S.-FNRS, Rue d'Egmont 5, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 29;8(17):eabn3132. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn3132.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abn3132
PMID:35486729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9054003/
Abstract

The trade in agricultural commodities is a backbone of the global economy but is a major cause of negative social and environmental impacts, not least deforestation. Commodity traders are key actors in efforts to eliminate deforestation-they are active in the regions where commodities are produced and represent a "pinch point" in global trade that provides a powerful lever for change. However, the procurement strategies of traders remain opaque. Here, we catalog traders' sourcing across four sectors with high rates of commodity-driven deforestation: South American soy, cocoa from Côte d'Ivoire, Indonesian palm oil, and Brazilian live cattle exports. We show that traders often source more than 40% of commodities "indirectly" via local intermediaries and that indirect sourcing is a major blind spot for sustainable sourcing initiatives. To eliminate deforestation, indirect sourcing must be included in sectoral initiatives, and landscape or jurisdictional approaches, which internalize indirect sourcing, must be scaled up.

摘要

农产品贸易是全球经济的支柱,但也是负面社会和环境影响的主要原因,尤其是森林砍伐。大宗商品贸易商是消除森林砍伐努力中的关键角色——他们活跃于大宗商品生产地区,是全球贸易中的一个“关键点”,为变革提供了强大杠杆。然而,贸易商的采购策略仍然不透明。在此,我们梳理了贸易商在四个因大宗商品驱动而森林砍伐率高的部门的采购情况:南美大豆、科特迪瓦的可可、印尼棕榈油以及巴西活牛出口。我们发现,贸易商常常通过当地中间商“间接”采购超过40%的大宗商品,而间接采购是可持续采购倡议的一个主要盲点。为消除森林砍伐,部门倡议必须纳入间接采购,并且必须扩大将间接采购内部化的景观或管辖区域方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/2aa4fa9e160b/sciadv.abn3132-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/6b511a12dcee/sciadv.abn3132-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/51286b9b418a/sciadv.abn3132-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/eaa94f91b9c2/sciadv.abn3132-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/2aa4fa9e160b/sciadv.abn3132-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/6b511a12dcee/sciadv.abn3132-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/51286b9b418a/sciadv.abn3132-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/eaa94f91b9c2/sciadv.abn3132-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b79/9054003/2aa4fa9e160b/sciadv.abn3132-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing indirect sourcing in zero deforestation commodity supply chains.解决零毁林商品供应链中的间接采购问题。
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 29;8(17):eabn3132. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn3132.
2
The origin, supply chain, and deforestation risk of Brazil's beef exports.巴西牛肉出口的起源、供应链和森林砍伐风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31770-31779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003270117. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
3
Leakage does not fully offset soy supply-chain efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil.渗漏并未完全抵消大豆供应链减少巴西森林砍伐的努力。
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 17;13(1):5476. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33213-z.
4
Price-Setting Power in Global Value Chains: The Cases of Price Stabilisation in the Cocoa Sectors in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana.全球价值链中的定价权:科特迪瓦和加纳可可行业价格稳定案例
Eur J Dev Res. 2022 Jun 23:1-29. doi: 10.1057/s41287-022-00543-z.
5
Explaining the stickiness of supply chain relations in the Brazilian soybean trade.解析巴西大豆贸易中供应链关系的粘性。
Glob Environ Change. 2023 Jan;78:102633. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102633.
6
Linking global drivers of agricultural trade to on-the-ground impacts on biodiversity.将农业贸易的全球驱动因素与对生物多样性的实地影响联系起来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23202-23208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905618116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
7
Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation.自2000年以来南美洲大豆的大规模扩张及其对保护工作的影响。
Nat Sustain. 2021;2021. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00729-z. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
8
Deforestation, certification, and transnational palm oil supply chains: Linking Guatemala to global consumer markets.森林砍伐、认证与跨国棕榈油供应链:将危地马拉与全球消费市场联系起来。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118505. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118505. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
9
Landscape-Scale Biodiversity Impacts Analysis of Côte d'Ivoire's Cocoa Cultivation along Export Supply Chains.科特迪瓦出口供应链沿线可可种植的景观尺度生物多样性影响分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 4;58(22):9601-9611. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07795. Epub 2024 May 18.
10
A method for calculating a land-use change carbon footprint (LUC-CFP) for agricultural commodities - applications to Brazilian beef and soy, Indonesian palm oil.一种用于计算农产品土地利用变化碳足迹(LUC-CFP)的方法——应用于巴西牛肉和大豆、印度尼西亚棕榈油。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Nov;20(11):3482-91. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12635. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving transmission centers of embodied forage-livestock conflicts from non-pastoral provinces to pastoral provinces in China.将中国农牧冲突的传播中心从非牧区省份转移至牧区省份。
Fundam Res. 2023 May 13;5(4):1622-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.04.009. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Cocoa plantations are associated with deforestation in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana.科特迪瓦和加纳的可可种植园与森林砍伐有关。
Nat Food. 2023 May;4(5):384-393. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00751-8. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Explaining the stickiness of supply chain relations in the Brazilian soybean trade.

本文引用的文献

1
Brazil's Amazon Soy Moratorium reduced deforestation.巴西的亚马逊大豆禁伐令减少了森林砍伐。
Nat Food. 2020 Dec;1(12):801-810. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00194-5. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
2
Sustainability standards in global agrifood supply chains.全球农业食品供应链中的可持续性标准。
Nat Food. 2021 Oct;2(10):758-765. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00360-3. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
Detecting cocoa plantations in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana and their implications on protected areas.在科特迪瓦和加纳探测可可种植园及其对保护区的影响。
解析巴西大豆贸易中供应链关系的粘性。
Glob Environ Change. 2023 Jan;78:102633. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102633.
4
Sustainable swine feeding programs require the convergence of multiple dimensions of circular agriculture and food systems with One Health.可持续的生猪饲养计划要求循环农业和粮食系统的多个维度与“同一健康”理念相结合。
Anim Front. 2022 Dec 14;12(6):30-40. doi: 10.1093/af/vfac077. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Ecol Indic. 2021 Oct;129:107863. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107863.
4
Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation.自2000年以来南美洲大豆的大规模扩张及其对保护工作的影响。
Nat Sustain. 2021;2021. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00729-z. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
5
The origin, supply chain, and deforestation risk of Brazil's beef exports.巴西牛肉出口的起源、供应链和森林砍伐风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31770-31779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003270117. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
The rotten apples of Brazil's agribusiness.巴西农业综合企业中的害群之马。
Science. 2020 Jul 17;369(6501):246-248. doi: 10.1126/science.aba6646.
7
Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship.跨国公司与生物圈管理的挑战。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Oct;3(10):1396-1403. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0978-z. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
Transparency and sustainability in global commodity supply chains.全球商品供应链中的透明度与可持续性。
World Dev. 2019 Sep;121:163-177. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.025.
9
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.全球森林损失的驱动因素分类。
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.
10
Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia.油棕可持续发展认证对印度尼西亚森林砍伐和火灾的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):121-126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704728114. Epub 2017 Dec 11.