• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量医生和医学生姑息治疗技能与知识的工具:心理测量特性的系统评价

Instruments to measure skills and knowledge of physicians and medical students in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties.

作者信息

López-García Mónica, Rubio Leticia, Martin-de-Las-Heras Stella, Suárez Juan, Pérez-Cárceles María D, Martin-Martin Jaime

机构信息

Cudeca Hospice (Palliative Care Foundation), Málaga, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2022 Oct;44(10):1133-1145. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2067033. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2067033
PMID:35486883
Abstract

PURPOSE

Palliative care is constantly increasing around the world. The knowledge and skills of future physicians in this area are crucial. This study evaluates the psychometric properties of knowledge and skills questionnaires used in palliative care, validated by physicians or medical students based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out in Cosmin Databases, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, SciELO, Cinahl, and Medline up to September 2020 (updated June 2021), based on the COSMIN methodology and PRISMA recommendations. The psychometric properties of each included questionnaire were identified. Methodological quality, quality of results, and quality of evidence were evaluated.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 12 questionnaires assessing the knowledge and skills of physicians or medical students. The Palliative Care Knowledge Questionnaire for PEACE (PEACE-Q) and Palliative Care Knowledge Test (PCKT) were the instruments with the highest scores for methodological quality, quality of results, and quality of evidence-based on the COSMIN methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

PEACE-Q and PCKT should be the preferred choice to assess palliative care knowledge and skills in physicians. In-depth studies following COSMIN validation criteria are recommended to improve the psychometric properties and cross-cultural validation of the questionnaires.

摘要

目的

姑息治疗在全球范围内不断增加。未来医生在该领域的知识和技能至关重要。本研究评估了姑息治疗中使用的知识和技能问卷的心理测量特性,这些问卷已由医生或医学生根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)方法进行了验证。

方法

截至2020年9月(2021年6月更新),在Cosmin数据库、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO、SciELO、Cinahl和Medline中基于COSMIN方法和PRISMA建议进行了系统评价。确定了每份纳入问卷的心理测量特性。评估了方法学质量、结果质量和证据质量。

结果

检索策略产生了12份评估医生或医学生知识和技能的问卷。基于COSMIN方法,PEACE姑息治疗知识问卷(PEACE-Q)和姑息治疗知识测试(PCKT)在方法学质量、结果质量和证据质量方面得分最高。

结论

PEACE-Q和PCKT应是评估医生姑息治疗知识和技能的首选。建议按照COSMIN验证标准进行深入研究,以改善问卷的心理测量特性和跨文化验证。

相似文献

1
Instruments to measure skills and knowledge of physicians and medical students in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties.测量医生和医学生姑息治疗技能与知识的工具:心理测量特性的系统评价
Med Teach. 2022 Oct;44(10):1133-1145. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2067033. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
The suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties.姑息治疗中的痛苦测量工具:心理测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103704. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
The dietary knowledge measurement instruments in diabetes: A systematic psychometric review.糖尿病饮食知识测量工具:系统心理测量学评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jun;77(6):2595-2622. doi: 10.1111/jan.14762. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Palliative care knowledge test for nurses and physicians: validation and cross-cultural adaptation.护士和医师的姑息治疗知识测试:验证和跨文化调适。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Sep;12(3):324-331. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002182. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
5
Cancer-related fatigue measures in palliative care: A psychometric systematic review.癌症相关疲乏在姑息治疗中的评估工具:心理测量学系统评价。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Sep;31(5):e13642. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13642. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
7
Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.舒缓治疗中痛苦测量工具的系统心理测量学评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e027524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524.
8
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
9
Instruments for the identification of patients in need of palliative care in the hospital setting: a systematic review of measurement properties.医院环境中识别需要姑息治疗患者的工具:测量属性的系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Mar 1;20(3):761-787. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00555.
10
Assessing Communication Skills of Medical Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE)--A Systematic Review of Rating Scales.在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中评估医学生的沟通技巧——评分量表的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152717. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed-method evaluation of a culturally-adapted basic palliative care curriculum for practicing physicians in mainland China.针对中国大陆执业医师的文化适应性基本姑息治疗课程的混合方法评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07665-y.
2
Enhancing medical students' understanding of end-of-life care ethics and law through video-triggered expert-led debriefing: a two-stage study.通过视频触发的专家引导式讨论增强医学生对临终关怀伦理和法律的理解:一项两阶段研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 9;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06304-2.