• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量个人健康信息共享意愿:系统评价。

Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1213615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615
PMID:37546309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10397406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the age of digitalization and big data, personal health information is a key resource for health care and clinical research. This study aimed to analyze the determinants and describe the measurement of the willingness to disclose personal health information.

METHODS

The study conducted a systematic review of articles assessing willingness to share personal health information as a primary or secondary outcome. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol. English and Italian peer-reviewed research articles were included with no restrictions for publication years. Findings were narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

The search strategy found 1,087 papers, 89 of which passed the screening for title and abstract and the full-text assessment.

CONCLUSION

No validated measurement tool has been developed for willingness to share personal health information. The reviewed papers measured it through surveys, interviews, and questionnaires, which were mutually incomparable. The secondary use of data was the most important determinant of willingness to share, whereas clinical and socioeconomic variables had a slight effect. The main concern discouraging data sharing was privacy, although good data anonymization and the high perceived benefits of sharing may overcome this issue.

摘要

背景

在数字化和大数据时代,个人健康信息是医疗保健和临床研究的关键资源。本研究旨在分析个人健康信息披露意愿的决定因素,并描述其测量方法。

方法

本研究对评估个人健康信息共享作为主要或次要结果的文章进行了系统综述。该综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目协议。纳入了英语和意大利语同行评议的研究文章,对出版年份没有限制。研究结果进行了叙述性综合。

结果

搜索策略共找到 1087 篇论文,其中 89 篇通过了标题和摘要以及全文评估的筛选。

结论

尚未开发出用于衡量个人健康信息共享意愿的验证性测量工具。综述中的论文通过调查、访谈和问卷来衡量这一意愿,这些方法之间是不可比的。数据的二次使用是决定共享意愿的最重要因素,而临床和社会经济变量的影响较小。阻碍数据共享的主要问题是隐私,但良好的数据匿名化和共享的高预期收益可能会克服这一问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5d1/10397406/4aed3cbcb082/fpubh-11-1213615-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5d1/10397406/4aed3cbcb082/fpubh-11-1213615-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5d1/10397406/4aed3cbcb082/fpubh-11-1213615-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.测量个人健康信息共享意愿:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1213615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615. eCollection 2023.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.分娩过程中疼痛管理的催眠疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.

引用本文的文献

1
Worldwide willingness to share health data high but privacy, consent and transparency paramount, a meta-analysis.一项荟萃分析表明,全球范围内共享健康数据的意愿很高,但隐私、同意和透明度至关重要。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 23;8(1):540. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01868-9.
2
Willingness to share information on social media: a systematic literature review (2020-2024).在社交媒体上分享信息的意愿:一项系统的文献综述(2020 - 2024年)
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1567506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567506. eCollection 2025.
3
Toward a Pragmatic Multidisciplinary Management of Nutritional Risk in Hospitalized Patients: Initiatives and Proposals of the Clinical Nutrition Network of Lombardy Region.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital Health Care, Telemedicine, and Medicolegal Issues in Orthopedics: A Review.数字医疗保健、远程医疗和骨科的医学法律问题:综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315653.
2
When Peppa Pig and Confucius meet, joining forces on the battlefield of health literacy-a qualitative analysis of COVID-19 educational materials for children and adolescents from China, the USA, and Europe.当小猪佩奇和孔子相遇,在健康素养的战场上联手——对来自中国、美国和欧洲的儿童和青少年的 COVID-19 教育材料进行定性分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 6;17(12):e0278554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278554. eCollection 2022.
3
迈向住院患者营养风险的务实多学科管理:伦巴第地区临床营养网络的举措与建议
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 27;17(9):1472. doi: 10.3390/nu17091472.
4
Public Opinions from Malawian and Malawi Refugee Camp Residents of Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance.马拉维和马拉维难民营居民对废水和环境监测的公众意见
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2025 May 13;113(1):200-213. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0759. Print 2025 Jul 2.
5
The Impact of Trust and the Role of the Opt-Out Mechanism in Willingness to Share Health Data via Electronic Health Records in Germany: Telephone Survey Study.信任的影响以及退出机制在德国通过电子健康记录共享健康数据意愿中的作用:电话调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 15;12:e65718. doi: 10.2196/65718.
6
The Public Knowledge of Precision Medicine and Genomic Research: A Survey in the Aosta Valley.精准医学与基因组研究的公众认知:在奥斯塔山谷的一项调查
J Pers Med. 2025 Feb 24;15(3):80. doi: 10.3390/jpm15030080.
7
Health data sharing in Germany: individual preconditions, trust and motives.德国的健康数据共享:个人前提条件、信任与动机。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;13:1538106. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1538106. eCollection 2025.
8
FHIR Granular Sensitive Data Segmentation.FHIR 细粒度敏感数据分割
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Jan;16(1):156-166. doi: 10.1055/a-2466-4371. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
9
Survey of attitudes in a Danish public towards reuse of health data.丹麦公众对健康数据再利用的态度调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 26;19(12):e0312558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312558. eCollection 2024.
10
The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.波兰对电子健康解决方案使用的促进因素和障碍的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02791-x.
Intelligent Pandemic Surveillance via Privacy-Preserving Crowdsensing.
通过隐私保护众包实现智能疫情监测。
IEEE Intell Syst. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):88-96. doi: 10.1109/mis.2022.3145691. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
4
Robot location privacy protection based on Q-learning particle swarm optimization algorithm in mobile crowdsensing.移动群智感知中基于Q学习粒子群优化算法的机器人位置隐私保护
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Sep 30;16:981390. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.981390. eCollection 2022.
5
Educational attainment and willingness to use technology for health and to share health information - The reimagining healthcare survey.教育程度和使用技术进行健康和分享健康信息的意愿 - 重新构想医疗保健调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104803. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104803. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Destruction of telecommunications hinders access to healthcare: A crime against humanity?破坏电信设施阻碍了医疗服务的获取:这是反人类罪吗?
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Jan;29(1):72. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221103829. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Patient consent preferences on sharing personal health information during the COVID-19 pandemic: "the more informed we are, the more likely we are to help".患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对分享个人健康信息的同意偏好:“我们了解得越多,就越有可能提供帮助”。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 May 20;23(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00790-z.
8
Ethical Views on Sharing Digital Data for Public Health Surveillance: Analysis of Survey Data Among Patients.关于为公共卫生监测共享数字数据的伦理观点:患者调查数据分析
Front Big Data. 2022 Apr 25;5:871236. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.871236. eCollection 2022.
9
Electronic health record adopters: a typology based on patients' privacy concerns and perceived benefits.电子健康记录采用者:基于患者隐私关注和感知收益的分类。
Public Health. 2022 Jun;207:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
10
The Impact of Health Information Privacy Concerns on Engagement and Payment Behaviors in Online Health Communities.健康信息隐私担忧对在线健康社区参与度和支付行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 8;13:861903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861903. eCollection 2022.