• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球卫生伙伴关系估值的公平工具。

The Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships.

机构信息

Canadian Association for Global Health (formerly Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research), Ottawa, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00316. Print 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00316
PMID:35487557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9053142/
Abstract

Global health partnerships (GHPs) involve complex relationships between individuals and organizations, often joining partners from high-income and low- or middle-income countries around work that is carried out in the latter. Therefore, GHPs are situated in the context of global inequities and their underlying sociopolitical and historical causes, such as colonization. Equity is a core principle that should guide GHPs from start to end. How equity is embedded and nurtured throughout a partnership has remained a constant challenge. We have developed a user-friendly tool for valuing a GHP throughout its lifespan using an equity lens. The development of the EQT was informed by 5 distinct elements: a scoping review of scientific published peer-reviewed literature; an online survey and follow-up telephone interviews; workshops in Canada, Burkina Faso, and Vietnam; a critical interpretive synthesis; and a content validation exercise. Findings suggest GHPs generate experiences of equity or inequity yet provide little guidance on how to identify and respond to these experiences. The EQT can guide people involved in partnering to consider the equity implications of all their actions, from inception, through implementation and completion of a partnership. When used to guide reflective dialogue with a clear intention to advance equity in and through partnering, this tool offers a new approach to valuing global health partnerships. Global health practitioners, among others, can apply the EQT in their partnerships to learning together about how to cultivate equity in their unique contexts within what is becoming an increasingly diverse, vibrant, and responsive global health community.

摘要

全球卫生伙伴关系(GHPs)涉及个人和组织之间的复杂关系,通常将来自高收入和低收入/中等收入国家的合作伙伴聚集在一起,共同在后者开展工作。因此,GHPs 处于全球不平等及其潜在的社会政治和历史原因的背景下,例如殖民化。公平是从开始到结束都应指导 GHPs 的核心原则。在整个伙伴关系中,公平是如何嵌入和培养的,这一直是一个挑战。我们开发了一个易于使用的工具,用于通过公平视角评估整个生命周期中的 GHP。EQT 的开发受到 5 个不同元素的启发:对已发表的同行评议科学文献进行范围审查;在线调查和后续电话访谈;在加拿大、布基纳法索和越南举办的研讨会;批判性解释性综合;和内容验证练习。研究结果表明,GHPs 产生公平或不公平的体验,但几乎没有指导如何识别和应对这些体验。EQT 可以指导参与合作的人员考虑从合作开始到实施和完成的所有行动的公平影响。当用于指导具有明确促进合作中的公平意图的反思性对话时,该工具为评估全球卫生伙伴关系提供了一种新方法。全球卫生从业人员以及其他人员可以在其合作关系中应用 EQT,共同了解如何在日益多样化、充满活力和响应迅速的全球卫生社区中,在其独特的背景下培养公平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d3d/9053142/13cd6b50f7d2/GH-GHSP220038F01a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d3d/9053142/13cd6b50f7d2/GH-GHSP220038F01a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d3d/9053142/13cd6b50f7d2/GH-GHSP220038F01a.jpg

相似文献

1
The Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships.全球卫生伙伴关系估值的公平工具。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00316. Print 2022 Apr 28.
2
Assessing how global health partnerships function: an equity-informed critical interpretive synthesis.评估全球卫生伙伴关系如何运作:基于公平性的批判性解释性综合分析。
Global Health. 2021 Jul 2;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00726-z.
3
Global Health Partnerships During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives and Insights from International Partners.全球卫生合作伙伴关系在 COVID-19 大流行期间:国际合作伙伴的观点和见解。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jun 28;105(2):407-412. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0156.
4
Hierarchy of qualities in global health partnerships: a path towards equity and sustainability.全球卫生伙伴关系中的质量层次:走向公平与可持续性的道路。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007132.
5
Bending the Arc towards Equitable Partnerships in Global Health and Applied Training.《全球健康与应用培训中的公平伙伴关系》
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Nov 6;85(1):130. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2564.
6
Informing 'good' global health research partnerships: A scoping review of guiding principles.知情的“良好”全球健康研究伙伴关系:指导原则的范围综述。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1892308. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1892308.
7
Championing Equity, Empowerment, and Transformational Leadership in (Mental Health) Research Partnerships: Aligning Collaborative Work With the Global Development Agenda.倡导(心理健康)研究伙伴关系中的公平、赋权和变革型领导力:使合作工作与全球发展议程保持一致。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 13;10:99. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099. eCollection 2019.
8
Employing the equity lens to understand multisectoral partnerships: lessons learned from a mixed-method study in Canada.运用公平视角理解多部门伙伴关系:来自加拿大混合方法研究的经验教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 26;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01746-w.
9
The role of global health partnerships in vaccine equity: A scoping review.全球卫生伙伴关系在疫苗公平性方面的作用:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;4(2):e0002834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002834. eCollection 2024.
10
The Binds of Global Health Partnership: Working out Working Together in Sierra Leone.全球卫生伙伴关系的纽带:在塞拉利昂共同努力
Med Anthropol Q. 2018 Dec;32(4):520-538. doi: 10.1111/maq.12462. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing best practices guidelines for collaborative research in global surgery: developing a Delphi survey.制定全球外科合作研究的最佳实践指南:开展德尔菲调查。
J Glob Health. 2025 Sep 5;15:04237. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04237.
2
Promoting More Equitable Global Health Research, Education, and Community Partnerships: The Efforts of One US‑Based Academic Institution.促进更公平的全球卫生研究、教育及社区伙伴关系:一所美国学术机构的努力
Ann Glob Health. 2025 Jun 11;91(1):31. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4772. eCollection 2025.
3
Using a Partnership-Based Approach to Strengthen Acute Care Systems in the Pacific and Timor-Leste.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing how global health partnerships function: an equity-informed critical interpretive synthesis.评估全球卫生伙伴关系如何运作:基于公平性的批判性解释性综合分析。
Global Health. 2021 Jul 2;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00726-z.
2
Informing 'good' global health research partnerships: A scoping review of guiding principles.知情的“良好”全球健康研究伙伴关系:指导原则的范围综述。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1892308. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1892308.
3
Will global health survive its decolonisation?全球卫生能否在去殖民化过程中存续下来?
采用基于伙伴关系的方法加强太平洋地区和东帝汶的急性护理系统。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Jun;37(3):e70063. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70063.
4
Transforming partnerships through transboundary research.通过跨界研究转变伙伴关系。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Apr 10;10(4):e017602. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017602.
5
How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey.非洲高级政策与规划主管如何实施卫生公平?一项区域调查的结果
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;5(3):e0004384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004384. eCollection 2025.
6
Working Towards a Decolonized, Longitudinal, and Equitable Global Health Training and Partnerships Program.致力于打造一个去殖民化、纵向且公平的全球健康培训与伙伴关系项目。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Mar 13;12:23821205251324297. doi: 10.1177/23821205251324297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
National capacity strengthening within the context of an international vector control partnership: findings from a qualitative study conducted within the Ugandan 'Tiny Targets' programme.国际病媒控制伙伴关系背景下的国家能力建设:乌干达“微小目标”项目定性研究的结果
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Apr 22;2(1):e000410. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000410. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on.经过125年的发展,如今开展了多步骤分析并共同制定了原则,以支持与利物浦热带医学院建立公平的伙伴关系。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 31;4(5):e0002091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002091. eCollection 2024.
9
Global emergency medicine partnerships and practice: best practices on forming partnerships.全球急诊医学伙伴关系与实践:建立伙伴关系的最佳实践
CJEM. 2024 Apr;26(4):224-227. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00629-5. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
10
Identifying the conundrums of "global health" in the Global North and Global South: a case for Sub-Saharan Africa.识别全球北方和南方“全球健康”的难题:以撒哈拉以南非洲为例
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 15;12:1168505. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1168505. eCollection 2024.
Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1627-1628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32417-X.
4
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
5
Decolonizing Global Health Education: Rethinking Institutional Partnerships and Approaches.去殖民化全球健康教育:重新思考机构伙伴关系和方法。
Acad Med. 2021 Mar 1;96(3):329-335. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003473.
6
The CCGHR Principles for Global Health Research: Centering equity in research, knowledge translation, and practice.CCGHR 全球健康研究原则:以研究、知识转化和实践为中心,关注公平。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112530. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112530. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Global Health Partnerships for Continuing Medical Education: Lessons from Successful Partnerships.全球继续医学教育伙伴关系:成功伙伴关系的经验教训
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Jul 2;2(3):241-253. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1220776.
8
Championing Equity, Empowerment, and Transformational Leadership in (Mental Health) Research Partnerships: Aligning Collaborative Work With the Global Development Agenda.倡导(心理健康)研究伙伴关系中的公平、赋权和变革型领导力:使合作工作与全球发展议程保持一致。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 13;10:99. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099. eCollection 2019.
9
What Makes International Global Health University Partnerships Higher-Value? An Examination of Partnership Types and Activities Favoured at Four East African Universities.是什么让国际全球健康大学伙伴关系更具价值?对东非四所大学偏好的伙伴关系类型和活动的考察。
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Apr 30;84(1):139-150. doi: 10.29024/aogh.20.
10
The : Filling a critical gap in global research ethics.填补全球研究伦理的关键空白。
Gates Open Res. 2018 Nov 15;2:58. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12884.1.