• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经过125年的发展,如今开展了多步骤分析并共同制定了原则,以支持与利物浦热带医学院建立公平的伙伴关系。

A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on.

作者信息

Karuga Robinson, Steege Rosie, Chowdhury Shahreen, Squire Bertie, Theobald Sally, Otiso Lilian

机构信息

Department of Research and Strategic Information, LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.

Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 31;4(5):e0002091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002091. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002091
PMID:38820344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11142479/
Abstract

Transboundary health partnerships are shaped by global inequities. Perspectives from the "global South" are critical to understand and redress power asymmetries in research partnerships yet are not often included in current guidelines. We undertook research with partners working with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) to inform LSTM's equitable partnership strategy and co-develop principles for equitable partnerships as an entry point towards broader transformative action on research partnerships. We applied mixed-methods and participatory approaches. An online survey (n = 21) was conducted with LSTM's transboundary partners on fairness of opportunity, fair process, and fair sharing of benefits, triangulated with key informant interviews (n = 12). Qualitative narratives were analysed using the thematic framework approach. Findings were presented in a participatory workshop (n = 11) with partners to co-develop principles, which were refined and checked with stakeholders. Early inclusion emerged as fundamental to equitable partnerships, reflected in principle one: all partners to input into research design, agenda-setting and outputs to reflect priorities. Transparency is highlighted in principle two to guide all stages including agenda-setting, budgeting, data ownership and authorship. Principle three underscores the importance of contextually embedded knowledge for relevant and impactful research. Multi-directional capacity strengthening across all cadres is highlighted in principle four. Principle five includes LSTM leveraging their position for strategic and deliberate promotion of transboundary partners in international forums. A multi-centric model of partnership with no centralised power is promoted in principle six. Finally, principle seven emphasises commitment to the principles and Global Code of Conduct values: Fairness, Respect, Care, Honesty. The co-developed principles are part of ongoing reflections and dialogue to improve and undo harmful power structures that perpetuate coloniality within global health. While this process was conducted with LSTM-Liverpool's existing partners, the principles to strengthen equity are applicable to other institutions engaged in transboundary research partnerships and relevant for funders.

摘要

跨境卫生伙伴关系受到全球不平等现象的影响。“全球南方”的观点对于理解和纠正研究伙伴关系中的权力不对称至关重要,但目前的指导方针中却常常没有纳入这些观点。我们与与利物浦热带医学院(LSTM)合作的伙伴开展了研究,为LSTM的公平伙伴关系战略提供信息,并共同制定公平伙伴关系的原则,以此作为对研究伙伴关系采取更广泛变革行动的切入点。我们采用了混合方法和参与式方法。对LSTM的跨境伙伴进行了一项关于机会公平、过程公平和利益公平分享的在线调查(n = 21),并与关键信息提供者访谈(n = 12)进行三角互证。使用主题框架方法对定性叙述进行了分析。研究结果在与伙伴共同参与的研讨会上(n = 11)进行了展示,以共同制定原则,并与利益相关者进行了完善和核对。早期参与被视为公平伙伴关系的基础,这在原则一中得到体现:所有伙伴都应参与研究设计、议程设定和成果产出,以反映优先事项。原则二强调透明度,以指导包括议程设定、预算编制、数据所有权和作者身份在内的所有阶段。原则三强调情境化知识对于相关且有影响力的研究的重要性。原则四突出了所有层面多向能力建设的重要性。原则五包括LSTM利用自身地位在国际论坛上战略性地、有意识地推广跨境伙伴。原则六提倡一种无集中权力的多中心伙伴关系模式。最后,原则七强调对这些原则和《全球行为准则》价值观(公平、尊重、关怀、诚实)的承诺。共同制定的这些原则是正在进行的反思和对话的一部分,旨在改善和消除在全球卫生领域延续殖民性的有害权力结构。虽然这一过程是与利物浦热带医学院的现有伙伴共同开展的,但加强公平性的这些原则适用于其他参与跨境研究伙伴关系的机构,并对资助者具有相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/880d/11142479/a959999a28cf/pgph.0002091.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/880d/11142479/388ae974f3a0/pgph.0002091.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/880d/11142479/a959999a28cf/pgph.0002091.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/880d/11142479/388ae974f3a0/pgph.0002091.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/880d/11142479/a959999a28cf/pgph.0002091.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on.经过125年的发展,如今开展了多步骤分析并共同制定了原则,以支持与利物浦热带医学院建立公平的伙伴关系。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 31;4(5):e0002091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002091. eCollection 2024.
2
"We should be at the table together from the beginning": perspectives on partnership from stakeholders at four research institutions in sub-Saharan Africa.“我们应该从一开始就坐在一起讨论”:来自撒哈拉以南非洲四个研究机构利益攸关方对伙伴关系的看法。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Aug 17;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01707-3.
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research.一个用于姑息治疗研究的更公平、多元和包容的患者及公众参与框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 8;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00525-3.
5
How are Research for Development Programmes Implementing and Evaluating Equitable Partnerships to Address Power Asymmetries?发展研究计划如何实施和评估公平伙伴关系以解决权力不对称问题?
Eur J Dev Res. 2023;35(2):351-379. doi: 10.1057/s41287-023-00578-w. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Informing 'good' global health research partnerships: A scoping review of guiding principles.知情的“良好”全球健康研究伙伴关系:指导原则的范围综述。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1892308. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1892308.
7
The community engagement course and action network: strengthening community and academic research partnerships to advance health equity.社区参与课程和行动网络:加强社区和学术研究伙伴关系,推进健康公平。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 19;11:1114868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114868. eCollection 2023.
8
Interview study exploring how global health partnership principles are enacted and recommendations for practice.访谈研究探索全球卫生伙伴关系原则的实施情况以及实践建议。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 11;14(6):e076475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076475.
9
Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom-Africa capacity strengthening award scheme.促进可持续的研究伙伴关系:对英国-非洲能力建设奖励计划的混合方法评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Dec 23;13:81. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0071-2.
10
Building and Sustaining Effective Partnerships for Training the Next Generation of Global Health Leaders.建立和维持有效的伙伴关系,以培养下一代全球卫生领导者。
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):66. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3214. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research.社区参与式研究中公平伙伴关系和权力分享的七个核心能力和条件。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 17;9(11):e015497. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015497.

本文引用的文献

1
In Search of the Global East: Thinking between North and South.寻找全球东方:在北方与南方之间思考
Geopolitics. 2018 Oct 2;25(3):734-755. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2018.1477757. eCollection 2020.
2
How to ensure equitable research partnerships in global health.如何确保全球卫生领域公平的研究伙伴关系。
BMJ. 2023 Jun 9;381:1316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p1316.
3
Equitable partnerships in global health research.全球卫生研究中的公平伙伴关系。
Nat Food. 2020 Dec;1(12):760-761. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00201-9.
4
Learning to walk the walk: Incorporating praxis for decolonization in global health education.学会言传身教:将实践纳入全球健康教育的去殖民化进程。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2193834. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2193834.
5
Funders: The missing link in equitable global health research?资助者:全球公平卫生研究中缺失的环节?
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;2(6):e0000583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000583. eCollection 2022.
6
Knowledge from the global South is in the global South.来自全球南方的知识就在全球南方。
J Med Ethics. 2023 May;49(5):337-338. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109089. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
7
How are Research for Development Programmes Implementing and Evaluating Equitable Partnerships to Address Power Asymmetries?发展研究计划如何实施和评估公平伙伴关系以解决权力不对称问题?
Eur J Dev Res. 2023;35(2):351-379. doi: 10.1057/s41287-023-00578-w. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics.知识从何而来?全球生物伦理学中的认识论正义。
J Med Ethics. 2023 May;49(5):325-334. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108291. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
9
Working in the wake: transformative global health in an imperfect world.在困境中前行:不完美世界中的变革性全球健康。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Sep;7(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010520.
10
Diversifying Implementation Science: A Global Perspective.多样化实施科学:全球视角。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Aug 30;10(4). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00757.