• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索女性对一种新型设备偏好的离散选择实验,该设备旨在监测子宫环境,增进我们对生殖障碍的理解。

Discrete choice experiment exploring women's preferences in a novel device designed to monitor the womb environment and improve our understanding of reproductive disorders.

机构信息

School of Human Development and Health, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e058419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058419.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058419
PMID:35487744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9058797/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to determine the relative importance of key attributes of a novel intrauterine device. The device monitors uterine oxygen, pH and temperature in real time with the aim of improving our understanding and treatment of reproductive disorders.

DESIGN

A discrete choice experiment was used to elicit preferences in this novel investigative tool. The attributes and levels used in the choice scenarios were length of time using the device (7, 14 or 28 days), information obtained to guide treatment (limited, majority or all cases), risk of complications (1% or 10%) and discreteness (completely discrete, moderately discrete or indiscrete).

SETTING

Secondary care hospital in Hampshire, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

361 women of reproductive age.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Conditional logit and latent class logit regression models to determine the preference for each attribute.

RESULTS

Conditional logit coefficients allow comparison between attributes; women placed most importance on obtaining information to guide treatment in all cases (2.771), followed by having a completely discrete device (1.104), reducing risk of complications by 1% (0.184) and decreased length of time by 1 day (0.0150). All coefficients p<0.01. Latent class conditional logit assigns participants to two classes with 27.4% in class 1 who are less likely to have higher education or qualify for National Health Service-funded in vitro fertilisation compared with class 2. Those in class 2 placed 1.7 times more importance on a device whose information guided treatment in all cases and a 1% decrease in complications risk was nearly 15 times more attractive.

CONCLUSIONS

Women placed most importance on having a device that obtains information to guide treatment and are willing to use the device for a longer, have a device with higher risk of complications and an indiscrete device if it is able to provide answers and direction for treatment of their reproductive disorder.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定一种新型宫内节育器关键属性的相对重要性。该器械实时监测子宫的氧气、pH 值和温度,旨在增进我们对生殖障碍的理解并改善其治疗效果。

设计

采用离散选择实验来评估该新型研究工具的偏好。选择情景中使用的属性和水平包括使用器械的时间长度(7、14 或 28 天)、指导治疗的获得信息(有限、多数或所有病例)、并发症风险(1%或 10%)和离散度(完全离散、中度离散或不离散)。

地点

英国汉普郡的二级保健医院。

参与者

361 名育龄妇女。

主要和次要结局测量指标

条件逻辑回归和潜在类别逻辑回归模型来确定对每个属性的偏好。

结果

条件逻辑回归系数可用于比较属性;女性最看重所有病例中获得指导治疗的信息(2.771),其次是完全离散的器械(1.104)、降低 1%的并发症风险(0.184)和减少 1 天的使用时间(0.0150)。所有系数 p<0.01。潜在类别条件逻辑回归将参与者分配到两个类别,其中 27.4%的参与者属于类别 1,与类别 2 相比,类别 1 的参与者不太可能接受过高等教育或有资格获得国家卫生服务机构资助的体外受精。类别 2 的参与者更看重一种器械,该器械在所有病例中都能提供指导治疗的信息,降低 1%的并发症风险的吸引力是近 15 倍。

结论

女性最看重获得能够指导治疗的器械,并愿意使用更长时间、风险更高的器械,以及完全不离散的器械,如果它能够为生殖障碍的治疗提供答案和指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fccf/9058797/c670a13377e8/bmjopen-2021-058419f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fccf/9058797/c670a13377e8/bmjopen-2021-058419f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fccf/9058797/c670a13377e8/bmjopen-2021-058419f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrete choice experiment exploring women's preferences in a novel device designed to monitor the womb environment and improve our understanding of reproductive disorders.探索女性对一种新型设备偏好的离散选择实验,该设备旨在监测子宫环境,增进我们对生殖障碍的理解。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e058419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058419.
2
Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.米索前列醇治疗流产后宫内组织物残留后影响女性对进一步处理选择偏好的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1674-1683. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex216.
3
Do patients prefer mesh or anterior colporrhaphy for primary correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a labelled discrete choice experiment.在原发性阴道前壁脱垂矫正中,患者更倾向于使用网片还是前路阴道修补术:一项标记离散选择实验。
BJOG. 2015 May;122(6):873-880. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12924. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
4
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,患者对人工智能应用与临床医生在疾病诊断中的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841.
5
Should I stay or should I go home? A latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment on hospital-at-home.我是留还是回家?居家住院的离散选择实验的潜在类别分析。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):588-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
6
Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.女性对孕早期流产管理属性的偏好:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):551-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00459.x. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
7
Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?探究女性对乳腺癌筛查偏好的异质性:风险沟通是否重要?
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Identifying women's preferences for treatment of urinary tract infection: a discrete choice experiment.识别女性对治疗尿路感染的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):e049916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049916.
9
Risk-Adapted Breast Screening for Women at Low Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer: An Online Discrete Choice Experiment.基于风险的乳腺癌低预测风险女性乳房筛查:一项在线离散选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):586-600. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241254828. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
10
Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.比较离散选择实验和案例 2 最佳最差标度的结果:在神经肌肉疾病治疗中的应用。
Patient. 2023 May;16(3):239-253. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00615-0. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Preferences of community-dwelling older adults with multimorbidity for digital empowerment interventions: Protocol for a discrete choice experiment study.患有多种疾病的社区老年人对数字赋权干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究的方案
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 25;11:20552076251319662. doi: 10.1177/20552076251319662. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The social stigma of infertile women in Zhejiang Province, China: a questionnaire-based study.中国浙江省不孕女性的社会耻辱感:一项基于问卷的研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01246-z.
2
The social and psychological consequences of women getting pregnant with fertility treatment: A qualitative study.生育治疗导致女性怀孕的社会和心理后果:一项定性研究。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Apr;57(2):463-472. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12641. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
The perspective of women with an increased risk of OHSS regarding the safety and burden of IVF: a discrete choice experiment.
卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)风险增加的女性对体外受精(IVF)安全性和负担的看法:一项离散选择实验
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Feb 24;2020(2):hoz034. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz034. eCollection 2020.
4
Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion.不孕和复发性流产的定义:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Mar;113(3):533-535. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Societal preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.澳大利亚生育治疗的社会偏好:基于选择的离散选择实验。
J Med Econ. 2019 Jan;22(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1549055. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
New perspectives for unexplained infertility.不明原因不孕症的新视角。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;54(4):727-33. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182353e54.
7
Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care.医生低估了以患者为中心对患者的重要性:一项生育护理中的离散选择实验。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):584-93. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq389. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
8
Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment.选择集的数量重要吗?一项应用离散选择实验的网络调查结果。
Health Econ. 2011 Mar;20(3):273-86. doi: 10.1002/hec.1587.
9
The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosure patterns, support and distress in new attendees at an infertility clinic.不孕不育诊所新就诊者中感知到的耻辱感、披露模式、支持与困扰之间的关系。
Hum Reprod. 2007 Aug;22(8):2309-17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem115. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
10
Effectiveness and treatment for unexplained infertility.不明原因不孕症的治疗与疗效
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5 Suppl 1):S111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1475.