• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

291 例脑膜瘤病例系列研究得出的关于最佳评估脑膜瘤脑侵犯对 2 级脑膜瘤诊断的临床和病理影响的经验教训。

Clinical and pathological impact of an optimal assessment of brain invasion for grade 2 meningioma diagnosis: lessons from a series of 291 cases.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69667, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.

Claude Bernard University, Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Aug;45(4):2797-2809. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01792-6. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-022-01792-6
PMID:35488071
Abstract

Brain invasion has not been recognized as a standalone criterion for atypical meningioma by the WHO classification until 2016. Since the 2007 edition suggested that meningiomas harboring brain invasion could be classified as grade 2, brain invasion study was progressively strengthened in our center, based on a strong collaboration between neurosurgeons and neuropathologists regarding sample orientation and examination. Practice changes were considered homogeneous enough in 2011. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of gross practice change on the clinical and pathological characteristics of intracranial meningiomas classified as grade 2.The characteristics of consecutive patients with a grade 2 meningioma surgically managed before (1998-2005, n = 125, group A) and after (2011-2014, n = 166, group B) practices changed were retrospectively reviewed.Sociodemographical and clinical parameters were comparable in groups A and B, and the median age was 62 years in both groups (p = 0.18). The 5-year recurrence rates (23.2% vs 29.5%, p = 0.23) were similar. In group A, brain invasion was present in 48/125 (38.4%) cases and was more frequent than in group B (14/166, 8.4%, p < 0.001). In group A, 33 (26.4%) meningiomas were classified as grade 2 solely based on brain invasion (group A), and 92 harbored other grade 2 criteria (group A). Group A meningiomas had a similar median progression-free survival compared to groups A (68 vs 80 months, p = 0.24) and to A and B pooled together (n = 258, 68 vs 90 months, p = 0.42).An accurate assessment of brain invasion is mandatory as brain invasion is a strong predictor of meningioma progression.

摘要

直到 2016 年,世界卫生组织分类才将脑侵犯视为非典型脑膜瘤的独立标准。自 2007 年版建议脑膜瘤中存在脑侵犯可被归类为 2 级以来,基于神经外科医生和神经病理学家在样本定向和检查方面的密切合作,我们中心逐渐加强了脑侵犯的研究。2011 年,实践变化被认为足够同质。本研究旨在评估大体实践变化对被归类为 2 级的颅内脑膜瘤的临床和病理特征的影响。回顾性分析了在实践改变之前(1998-2005 年,n=125,A 组)和之后(2011-2014 年,n=166,B 组)手术治疗的连续 2 级脑膜瘤患者的特征。A 组和 B 组的社会人口学和临床参数相似,两组的中位年龄均为 62 岁(p=0.18)。5 年复发率(23.2%比 29.5%,p=0.23)相似。在 A 组中,125 例中有 48 例(38.4%)存在脑侵犯,明显多于 B 组(166 例中有 14 例,8.4%,p<0.001)。在 A 组中,有 33 例(26.4%)脑膜瘤仅基于脑侵犯被归类为 2 级(A 组),92 例脑膜瘤存在其他 2 级标准(A 组)。A 组脑膜瘤的无进展生存率与 A 组(68 个月比 80 个月,p=0.24)和 A 组和 B 组总和(n=258,68 个月比 90 个月,p=0.42)相似。准确评估脑侵犯是必要的,因为脑侵犯是脑膜瘤进展的强烈预测因子。

相似文献

1
Clinical and pathological impact of an optimal assessment of brain invasion for grade 2 meningioma diagnosis: lessons from a series of 291 cases.291 例脑膜瘤病例系列研究得出的关于最佳评估脑膜瘤脑侵犯对 2 级脑膜瘤诊断的临床和病理影响的经验教训。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Aug;45(4):2797-2809. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01792-6. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: prognostic implications of clinicopathological features.非典型性和间变性脑膜瘤:临床病理特征的预后意义
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 May;79(5):574-80. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.121582. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
3
Brain invasion assessability in meningiomas is related to meningioma size and grade, and can be improved by extensive sampling of the surgically removed meningioma specimen.脑膜瘤的脑侵袭可评估性与脑膜瘤大小和分级有关,通过对手术切除的脑膜瘤标本进行广泛采样可提高其可评估性。
Clin Neuropathol. 2014 Sep-Oct;33(5):354-63. doi: 10.5414/NP300750.
4
Necrosis and Brain Invasion Predict Radio-Resistance and Tumor Recurrence in Atypical Meningioma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.非典型脑膜瘤的坏死和脑侵犯预测放射抵抗和肿瘤复发:一项回顾性队列研究。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Dec 15;88(1):E42-E48. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa348.
5
Necrosis is a consistent factor to recurrence of meningiomas: should it be a stand-alone grading criterion for grade II meningioma?坏死是脑膜瘤复发的一个一致因素:它是否应该成为 II 级脑膜瘤的独立分级标准?
J Neurooncol. 2018 Apr;137(2):331-336. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2721-4. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
The impact of brain invasion criteria on the incidence and distribution of WHO grade 1, 2, and 3 meningiomas.脑侵犯标准对 WHO 分级 1、2 和 3 级脑膜瘤发病率和分布的影响。
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;24(9):1524-1532. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac032.
7
World Health Organization Grade III Meningiomas: A Retrospective Study at an Academic Medical Center.世界卫生组织 III 级脑膜瘤:一家学术医疗中心的回顾性研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e877-e893. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.080. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Microscopic brain invasion in meningiomas previously classified as WHO grade I is not associated with patient outcome.此前被归类为 WHO 分级 I 的脑膜瘤中的微观脑侵犯与患者预后无关。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Dec;145(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03312-x. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
9
Analysis of the results of recurrent intracranial meningiomas treated with re-radiosurgery.复发性颅内脑膜瘤再行放射外科治疗的结果分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;153:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
10
Is the Simpson Grading System Applicable to Estimate the Risk of Tumor Progression After Microsurgery for Recurrent Intracranial Meningioma?辛普森分级系统是否适用于评估复发性颅内脑膜瘤显微手术后的肿瘤进展风险?
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e589-e597. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.215. Epub 2018 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparameter MRI-based radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of brain invasion in atypical meningioma:a multicentre study.基于多参数 MRI 的放射组学列线图预测非典型脑膜瘤脑侵犯的术前预测:一项多中心研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jun 5;24(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01294-5.
2
Descriptive epidemiology of 30,223 histopathologically confirmed meningiomas in France: 2006-2015.法国 2006-2015 年 30223 例组织病理学证实的脑膜瘤的描述性流行病学研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 May 14;166(1):214. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06093-z.
3
Meningiomas with CNS invasion.

本文引用的文献

1
Microscopic brain invasion in meningiomas previously classified as WHO grade I is not associated with patient outcome.此前被归类为 WHO 分级 I 的脑膜瘤中的微观脑侵犯与患者预后无关。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Dec;145(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03312-x. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
WHO grade of intracranial meningiomas differs with respect to patient's age, location, tumor size and peritumoral edema.世界卫生组织(WHO)对颅内脑膜瘤的分级因患者年龄、位置、肿瘤大小和瘤周水肿而异。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Nov;145(2):277-286. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03293-x. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
Brain invasion in meningiomas: does surgical sampling impact specimen characteristics and histology?
伴有中枢神经系统侵犯的脑膜瘤。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 29;17:1189606. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1189606. eCollection 2023.
4
Differences in intraoperative sampling during meningioma surgery regarding CNS invasion - Results of a survey on behalf of the EANS skull base section.脑膜瘤手术中关于中枢神经系统侵犯的术中取样差异——欧洲神经外科协会颅底分会的一项调查结果
Brain Spine. 2023 Apr 11;3:101740. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101740. eCollection 2023.
5
Base MRI Imaging Characteristics of Meningioma Patients to Discuss the WHO Classification of Brain Invasion Otherwise Benign Meningiomas.脑膜瘤患者的基础 MRI 成像特征,探讨其他良性脑膜瘤的 WHO 脑侵袭分类。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231171470. doi: 10.1177/15330338231171470.
脑膜瘤的脑侵犯:手术取样是否影响标本特征和组织学?
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Apr;43(2):793-800. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01125-0. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
4
Prediction of brain invasion in patients with meningiomas using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.利用术前磁共振成像预测脑膜瘤患者的脑侵犯情况。
Oncotarget. 2018 Nov 13;9(89):35974-35982. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26313.
5
Histopathological features to define atypical meningioma: What does really matter for prognosis?定义非典型脑膜瘤的组织病理学特征:哪些对预后真正重要?
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2018 Jul;35(3):168-180. doi: 10.1007/s10014-018-0318-z. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Atypical meningioma. A study on recurrence and disease-specific survival.非典型脑膜瘤。复发及疾病特异性生存研究。
Neurochirurgie. 2017 Sep;63(4):273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Histopathological prognostic factors of recurrence following definitive therapy for atypical and malignant meningiomas.非典型性和恶性脑膜瘤确定性治疗后复发的组织病理学预后因素。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;128(4):1123-1132. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS16913. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
8
Brain invasion in meningiomas-clinical considerations and impact of neuropathological evaluation: a systematic review.脑膜瘤中的脑侵犯——临床考虑因素和神经病理评估的影响:系统评价。
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1298-1307. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox071.
9
Atypical meningioma-is it time to standardize surgical sampling techniques?非典型脑膜瘤——是时候规范手术取样技术了吗?
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):453-454. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now245.
10
Brain Invasion in Meningiomas: The Rising Importance of a Uniform Neuropathologic Assessment After the Release of the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors.脑膜瘤的脑侵犯:2016年世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类发布后统一神经病理学评估的重要性日益凸显
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:614-615. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.047.