University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, USA.
University of South Florida College of Education, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Oct 11;66(8):1081-1085. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac029.
Thermal Work Limit (TWL) recommends a maximum metabolic rate for a given environmental condition, clothing ensemble, and acclimatization state so that thermal equilibrium can be sustained at or below the limiting metabolic rate. The purpose of this paper was to assess the ability of TWL to recommend maximum sustainable levels of heat stress using an existing database of progressive heat stress trials using four levels of clothing (woven clothing, particle barrier, water barrier, and vapor barrier), three levels of relative humidity, and three levels of metabolic rate. Each trial had a compensable and an uncompensable observation plus and observation at the transition point from compensable to uncompensable. Each observation was classified as a case (steady increase in rectal temperature) or non-case (steady rectal temperature). The data were used to compare the difference between the observed metabolic rate (Mobs) and the limiting metabolic rate of TWL (i.e., ∆LimitTWL = Mobs - TWL), where ∆LimitTWL > 0 was above the TWL limit. The sensitivity and specificity for each of the four clothing ensembles were about 0.96 and about 0.20, respectively. Logistic regression for all the data found that ∆LimitTWL, clothing, metabolic rate, and water vapor pressure were significant predictors of outcome. The ln(odds) equations for each clothing ensemble predicted a probability of an uncompensable exposure. The probability of an uncompensable outcome (case) when ∆LimitTWL = 0 was 0.14 for work clothes and particle barrier, and 0.22 for water barrier and vapor barrier. The probability of a case at ∆LimitTWL = 0 was greater than the probability of a case for the wet bulb globe temperature-based exposure limits where the probability of a case was 0.01. That is, the TWL was less restrictive than WBGT but with higher risk.
热作极限 (TWL) 为特定环境条件、服装组合和适应状态下的最大代谢率设定了限制,以便在限制代谢率或以下维持热平衡。本文的目的是评估 TWL 推荐最大可持续热应激水平的能力,使用现有的渐进热应激试验数据库,该数据库使用四层服装(梭织服装、颗粒屏障、水屏障和蒸汽屏障)、三种相对湿度水平和三种代谢率水平。每个试验都有一个可补偿和一个不可补偿的观察值,以及在可补偿到不可补偿的过渡点的观察值。每个观察值都被分类为案例(直肠温度持续升高)或非案例(直肠温度稳定)。这些数据用于比较观察到的代谢率 (Mobs) 和 TWL 的限制代谢率之间的差异(即 ∆LimitTWL = Mobs - TWL),其中 ∆LimitTWL > 0 表示超过 TWL 限制。四种服装组合的灵敏度和特异性分别约为 0.96 和 0.20。对所有数据进行的逻辑回归发现,∆LimitTWL、服装、代谢率和水蒸气压力是结果的显著预测因子。每个服装组合的 ln(odds) 方程预测了不可补偿暴露的概率。当 ∆LimitTWL = 0 时,工作服和颗粒屏障的不可补偿结果(案例)的概率为 0.14,水屏障和蒸汽屏障的概率为 0.22。当 ∆LimitTWL = 0 时,案例的概率大于基于湿球黑球温度的暴露限制的案例概率,案例的概率为 0.01。也就是说,TWL 比 WBGT 限制小,但风险更高。