• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中越合作研究报告:中越两国不同生产体系下妊娠母猪福利的比较。

Comparison of the Welfare of Gestation Sows Raised in Different Production Systems in North Vietnam.

机构信息

Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Data Science Department, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2024 Jul-Sep;27(3):427-441. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2022.2070846. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1080/10888705.2022.2070846
PMID:35488379
Abstract

Intensification and complexity of pig production systems may require different strategies for animal welfare improvement. We aimed to identify welfare issues of gestation sows and areas for improvement by comparing four production systems, including the smallholder pen-based system (SPS: 26 farms), smallholder stall-based system (SSS:14 farms), semi-intensive stall-based system (SES: 15 farms), and intensive stall-based system (ISS: 10 farms). Ten significant animal-based measures in the Welfare Quality® protocol were used for welfare assessment at the individual level. Stall-housed sows in SES and ISS faced more welfare problems where sows presented a higher prevalence of poor body condition (0.001), wounds on body (0.003), fear of humans (0.001), and stereotypies (0.001) than pen-housed sows in the SPS. Sows in the SPS presented the highest prevalence of panting (0.001). Welfare improvement should be focused on minimizing the adverse effects of hot weather on sows in the SPS and SSS and redesigning a more welfare-friendly housing system that prevents sows from the risk of wounds on body and enables them to perform motivated behaviors in the SES and ISS.

摘要

集约化和复杂化的养猪生产系统可能需要不同的策略来改善动物福利。我们旨在通过比较四种生产系统(包括 26 个农场的小型养猪户圈养系统、14 个农场的小型养猪户拴系系统、15 个农场的半集约化拴系系统和 10 个农场的集约化拴系系统),来确定妊娠母猪的福利问题和改进领域。使用 Welfare Quality®协议中的十个重要基于动物的措施,在个体水平上进行福利评估。 SES 和 ISS 中圈养的母猪面临更多的福利问题,这些母猪的身体状况较差(0.001)、身体上有伤口(0.003)、对人类恐惧(0.001)和刻板行为(0.001)的发生率高于 SPS 中的母猪。SPS 中的母猪喘气的发生率最高(0.001)。福利改善应侧重于最大限度地减少 SPS 和 SSS 中母猪对炎热天气的不利影响,并重新设计一种更有利于福利的饲养系统,防止母猪身体受伤,并使它们能够在 SES 和 ISS 中表现出受激励的行为。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Welfare of Gestation Sows Raised in Different Production Systems in North Vietnam.中越合作研究报告:中越两国不同生产体系下妊娠母猪福利的比较。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2024 Jul-Sep;27(3):427-441. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2022.2070846. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
On-farm evaluation of methods to assess welfare of gestating sows.妊娠母猪福利评估方法的农场实地评估
Animal. 2014 Jul;8(7):1153-61. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114000949. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
3
A 25 years experience of group-housed sows-reproduction in animal welfare-friendly systems.在有利于动物福利的系统中群养母猪繁殖的25年经验。
Acta Vet Scand. 2014 Jun 9;56(1):37. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-37.
4
Animal board invited review: The need to consider emissions, economics and pig welfare in the transition from farrowing crates to pens with loose lactating sows.动物委员会邀请的评论:从分娩笼向带松散泌乳母猪的猪圈过渡时需要考虑排放、经济和猪只福利。
Animal. 2023 Sep;17(9):100913. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100913. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
5
Test-retest reliability of the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for pigs applied to sows and piglets. Part 2. Assessment of the principles good feeding, good housing, and good health1.猪福利质量评估方案的重测信度在母猪和仔猪上的应用。第 2 部分。良好饲养、良好环境和良好健康原则的评估 1。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;97(3):1143-1157. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz018.
6
Effects of group housing on reproductive performance, lameness, injuries and saliva cortisol in gestating sows.群养对妊娠母猪繁殖性能、跛足、损伤及唾液皮质醇的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 15;160:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
7
Factors associated with specific health, welfare and reproductive performance indicators in pig herds from five EU countries.来自五个欧盟国家的猪群中与特定健康、福利和繁殖性能指标相关的因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 1;159:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
8
[Field trial of an open pen - comparison of two different types of farrowing pens].[开放式猪舍的田间试验——两种不同类型产仔舍的比较]
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2018 Oct;46(5):283-290. doi: 10.15653/TPG-180010. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Reproductive issues in welfare-friendly housing systems in pig husbandry: a review.养猪业中有利于福利的住房系统中的繁殖问题:综述
Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 Aug;47 Suppl 5:51-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02108.x.
10
The welfare and productivity of dry sows in different group housing systems in New Zealand.新西兰不同群体饲养系统中妊娠母猪的福利与生产性能
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2013;16(2):150-67. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2013.768920.